First of all, sorry for the revival. I came across this thread fairly randomly and have spent quite a while reading through. Sad I know.
I'm not going to address all the badge snob comments etc; frankly I couldn't give two ****s about a badge. A good car is a good car, and i'd even tootle about in a Lada if it was half decent.
As you might have guessed I'm an ST driver, I've done a fair bit to it (mods in my signature) and I'm currently running 325bhp and 402lb ft. 0-60 time isn't amazing, however it's good enough for a fwd. 5.7, could prob go faster, but the st's driveshafts are made out of chocolate and I can't be ***** landing up with an 800 pound bill because I wanted the biggest ****. Mid range is where it's at with the st's though. 402lb ft means 50-100 goes in an instant.
Anyway, I thought I'd clear a few things up that I've read in the thread
What's the wheel spin like on one of these with a remap? I've seen a few FWD cars with over 300bhp and they spin in 3rd and sometimes 4th!!
With good tyres wheelspin is not a problem for me in the dry. Any gear I can just plant my foot and it grips.
The wet is a different story. Planting my foot at low rpm in any gear, including 6th, and my wheels spin, mainly because I have 402lb ft at 2500rpm. I have to be very progressive with the throttle in the wet, and whereas you guys can probably accelerate fully straight away, it takes me a second or two to apply full throttle. Once it grips it's fine though.
I was sat here reading this post and thought you might be interested.
The reason for decimation was most likely this:-
This is a new standard Focus ST which has been remapped. Volvo 2.5 litre engines coupled with turbo = a bucket load of torque and enough bhp to wipe the floor with most S3 8Ls.
Even with the figures that i'm pushing out, i'd be thinking twice...a mapped ST is a worthy adversary despite it giant frame.
Definitely agree with the mapped st comment, however the graph you have picked is fairly shocking for an ST. It makes **** all torque before 4000rpm, when the st's strength is its low down torque. Here's an example graph of the map i'm running, and most st remaps are similar in shape, just not power lol.
image hosting
I'd heard that most make 280ish on a decent rollers, didn't realise some even went below that figure!
. After all none have ever made the 300bhp they were claimed to have. Majority make anywhere between 265-280.
The first rs's had software problems, and like you say, didn't make full power. This was all sorted by a software update, and standard rs's now make the claimed power. Just remember that there are not many standard ones about anymore, with several pushing 500+
Just been messing about looking at power:weight ratios,
911 C4S - 242bhp/ton
My A3 - 265bhp/ton
Sweet! I'm going Porsche hunting!
I've done this before too mate. Mines 250/ton, but quite a bit of torque too, 305/ton. Cl63 is 248/ton, bentley conti is 244/ton, aston martin v8 vantage 233/ton etc etc. I do get a perverse pleasure in toying with porsche, bmw, merc etc drivers who insist on sitting on my ****, flashing their lights.
Not my video, but this is a 400bhp st taking on an r8 v10. When the r8 starts accelerating first he gets decimated, but watch what happens when they both start at the same time.
400bhp bhp st vs Lamborghini Gallardo