I have a 6 year old son...if he grows up to be a gaylord bummer then I won't exactly be over the moon, but it won't be the end of the world.
If I have any daughters then I would prefer if they kissed girls...in fact no men-kissing allowed until they're at least 30!!!
I try and see everything fairly and from all different perspectives...but narrow-mindedness and intolerance, I can't do it sorry.
There are two arguments here....
1) KatieKatie's approach and "real reasons" for wanting the sig gone
2) Whether the sig should've been removed for the simple fact that it could offend some people.
Each argument is seperate.... and the intentions of number 1 are definitely suspect and debatable IMO.
Number 2 is fair cop, and if i'm being fair, I agree with it.
So let me get this straight....... there is no way, no how, not an inch of understanding you have that someone could be offended etc about pictures of two women kissing when all they have done is come on a site to read about cars???
Whether it be because they don't want to see it themselves, or that they don't want people around them seeing it???
PS: I have set my daughter's men-kissing age at 45. I'd recommend those extra 15 years.
As 10B stated a while back, if she is firing for effect: mission complete.
Roll up, roll up...
Circus in town.
The next performance of the 'arguing *******' will be along directly.
Is this the 8P A3 forum?
For goodness sake folks...
Let it go.
And move on.