ANX
Registered User
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2017
- Messages
- 41
- Reaction score
- 19
- Points
- 8
So in an attempt to remain positive despite todays issues with the car, I thought it might be useful to anyone considering this powertrain to hear my thoughts so far - I know I tried to find info on this particular combination when ordering but everything I came across was for the higher powered, or FWD diesels.
You can see from my sig the cars I've had in the past as my points of reference, as for me.. I'm no hooligan but I like to drive my cars... I have a 70 mile round trip to work so have to be reasonably sensible when it comes to choosing the engine and so tend to look for something that has a bit of punch when needed but will allow me to retain both my licence and wife (must not spend more on car running costs than the mortgage!)
I should also say that I'm only 500 miles in so still being reasonably sensible with the go pedal.
So to the car... first smile on my face didn't take too long, after spending three years feathering the clutch in the GTD to try and put down some traction for an 'enthusiastic' standing start, this thing flies off the line. To escape work I have a 90 degree right turn into traffic onto a busy, uphill single carriageway A road to negotiate, its been a good test for all my cars over the last 10 years - the GTD would squirm and tramp its way up the hill in 1st and 2nd in the dry, The Quattro shoot out with no fuss in pouring down rain with no hint of traction control kicking in. There's a MKII TTS driver in work who had a go and was impressed.. that's a decent enough recommendation in my book.
I don't remember the B8 3.2 Quattro I had being quite this grippy, in fact I had a very minor encounter with a tree on another right turn on the same road in some particularly treacherous conditions a few winters back.
So off the line, tick in the box - I'm very pleased with the TDI Quattro combination - the wheel spin in the little red Golf became quite endearing by the end and a bit of fun, but I don't think I would appreciate that in the bigger more comfortable car.
For general handling its hard to be objective when recalling cars from longer ago, but the obvious comparison is with the B8. I don't remember the suspension being quite as soft through the corners as this A4, both are/where S line with sport suspension on 18", but this just seems a little more...flexible. Nothing terrible - in fact this is a far better drive so far, the old B8 felt a bit wooden... grip, and then no grip without much communication in between - possibly just more noticeable after spending a few years in the GTD with its relative shopping trolley like suspension.
Which brings me to pace on the move... So obviously I get that this is a bigger car, in another class, with more weight, more gears and four wheels to drive.... but it feels a little lack lustre on the move...
The best thing about the 170/184/190 diesels in my mind is the ability to change speed quickly and lazily in gear without biffing the engine - for instance the with the Golf if I put in 4th at 60 was right on the torque curve and gave you that 'kick in the pants' for a couple of thousand revs, it just felt faster than a 2.0 derv ever should, even a company 140 Jetta I had use of a few years back had it - its just not there in the A4 - at similar speeds with the 7 speed 4th is too high rpm and 5th is too low, at least that's how it feels, you just don't seem to be able to ride the torque curve as effectively at legal speeds. I understand that producing power over a broader torque curve is more efficient and probably faster on paper, but its just feels.... well a little bit boring in the context of the other 2.0 VAG TD's I've owned and driven. Perhaps all that extra weight is just too much for the 2.0... perhaps I just need to sync up with the longer gearing.. or perhaps I'm just asking too much of a 500mile old engine and it will loosen up.
So I guess in summary I had a PCP budget to stick to, I knew I wanted the Virtual Dash and Quattro. The 2.0 TDI is the 'cheapest' way to go Quattro so in effect that was my compromise to get the tech pack and VD - I wouldn't have stretched to the 3.0 TDIs but I was looking at the 252 TFSI. I would certainly stick with Quattro, but I have to be honest that whilst the VD looks very impressive and is a talking point... it doesn't really do all that much - I guess for now I'll just hope the TDI loosens up and I don't come to rue the day I didn't go for the 252 TFSI and leave the tech pack - then again there's always DTUK if it doesn't!
Will be sure to update after the next 1000 miles or so to see how she feels then, in the meantime will be glad to hear from any fellow owners on how their 2.0 190s feel as the miles clock up, or if anyone else has the 2.0 Quattro to add their thoughts for others benefit.
Thanks for listening...
ANX
You can see from my sig the cars I've had in the past as my points of reference, as for me.. I'm no hooligan but I like to drive my cars... I have a 70 mile round trip to work so have to be reasonably sensible when it comes to choosing the engine and so tend to look for something that has a bit of punch when needed but will allow me to retain both my licence and wife (must not spend more on car running costs than the mortgage!)
I should also say that I'm only 500 miles in so still being reasonably sensible with the go pedal.
So to the car... first smile on my face didn't take too long, after spending three years feathering the clutch in the GTD to try and put down some traction for an 'enthusiastic' standing start, this thing flies off the line. To escape work I have a 90 degree right turn into traffic onto a busy, uphill single carriageway A road to negotiate, its been a good test for all my cars over the last 10 years - the GTD would squirm and tramp its way up the hill in 1st and 2nd in the dry, The Quattro shoot out with no fuss in pouring down rain with no hint of traction control kicking in. There's a MKII TTS driver in work who had a go and was impressed.. that's a decent enough recommendation in my book.
I don't remember the B8 3.2 Quattro I had being quite this grippy, in fact I had a very minor encounter with a tree on another right turn on the same road in some particularly treacherous conditions a few winters back.
So off the line, tick in the box - I'm very pleased with the TDI Quattro combination - the wheel spin in the little red Golf became quite endearing by the end and a bit of fun, but I don't think I would appreciate that in the bigger more comfortable car.
For general handling its hard to be objective when recalling cars from longer ago, but the obvious comparison is with the B8. I don't remember the suspension being quite as soft through the corners as this A4, both are/where S line with sport suspension on 18", but this just seems a little more...flexible. Nothing terrible - in fact this is a far better drive so far, the old B8 felt a bit wooden... grip, and then no grip without much communication in between - possibly just more noticeable after spending a few years in the GTD with its relative shopping trolley like suspension.
Which brings me to pace on the move... So obviously I get that this is a bigger car, in another class, with more weight, more gears and four wheels to drive.... but it feels a little lack lustre on the move...
The best thing about the 170/184/190 diesels in my mind is the ability to change speed quickly and lazily in gear without biffing the engine - for instance the with the Golf if I put in 4th at 60 was right on the torque curve and gave you that 'kick in the pants' for a couple of thousand revs, it just felt faster than a 2.0 derv ever should, even a company 140 Jetta I had use of a few years back had it - its just not there in the A4 - at similar speeds with the 7 speed 4th is too high rpm and 5th is too low, at least that's how it feels, you just don't seem to be able to ride the torque curve as effectively at legal speeds. I understand that producing power over a broader torque curve is more efficient and probably faster on paper, but its just feels.... well a little bit boring in the context of the other 2.0 VAG TD's I've owned and driven. Perhaps all that extra weight is just too much for the 2.0... perhaps I just need to sync up with the longer gearing.. or perhaps I'm just asking too much of a 500mile old engine and it will loosen up.
So I guess in summary I had a PCP budget to stick to, I knew I wanted the Virtual Dash and Quattro. The 2.0 TDI is the 'cheapest' way to go Quattro so in effect that was my compromise to get the tech pack and VD - I wouldn't have stretched to the 3.0 TDIs but I was looking at the 252 TFSI. I would certainly stick with Quattro, but I have to be honest that whilst the VD looks very impressive and is a talking point... it doesn't really do all that much - I guess for now I'll just hope the TDI loosens up and I don't come to rue the day I didn't go for the 252 TFSI and leave the tech pack - then again there's always DTUK if it doesn't!
Will be sure to update after the next 1000 miles or so to see how she feels then, in the meantime will be glad to hear from any fellow owners on how their 2.0 190s feel as the miles clock up, or if anyone else has the 2.0 Quattro to add their thoughts for others benefit.
Thanks for listening...
ANX