Knew it would get me in trouble.......

Maybe us younger folk should call for a retest of the older generations having taken theory tests with <25 questions or none at all and no hazard perception, easier practical tests (remarkably less traffic on the roads even 5 years ago let alone 30+!! no show me tell me etc etc ). Whilst we are at it why don't you just bash the younger generation a little more I mean we are all ******* useless benefit taking, smoking drug and drinking youngsters right?

Personally If I couldn't drive now at 22 I wouldn't have my job I wouldn't be paying tax through fuel, insurance and spending my money that contributes to the economy, what kind of freedom and life would I have without my car? 25 Is just absurd especially when you consider that some states in the USA allow driving with a full license at 16 .....

Couldn't agree more!! Unfortunately you're always going to get bigoted people that fail to remember how it was when they were a young driver. Everyone did things as a younger driver that they wouldn't do now. I think this and I'm 22.
 
Maybe making the test more stringent would help but making motorway driving compulsory is impossible with certain parts of the country hours of driving away from the nearest stretch.
I think the problem lies in people's perceived threat and that the current system relies on 'right of way' with drivers ever so safe sitting in high tech cars full of safety features. If everybody took Compulsory Basic Training on a scooter as part of the driving test they'd be better able to read the road and more aware through self preservation.
Anecdotal but I remember a suggestion that one way to tackle Road safety would be to remove signs and put a spike in the middle of steering wheels. It's an extreme extrapolation but from a sound basis.
Anyway I agree wholeheartedly that it is the general standard of driving that's the problem not necessarily speed, though it is a definite factor.
In my experience cameras are for revenue generation, I don't know the stats but it would be interesting to know the accident figures in Wiltshire, both before and after they turned off all static speed cameras.....
 
Maybe making the test more stringent would help but making motorway driving compulsory is impossible with certain parts of the country hours of driving away from the nearest stretch.
I think the problem lies in people's perceived threat and that the current system relies on 'right of way' with drivers ever so safe sitting in high tech cars full of safety features. If everybody took Compulsory Basic Training on a scooter as part of the driving test they'd be better able to read the road and more aware through self preservation.
Anecdotal but I remember a suggestion that one way to tackle Road safety would be to remove signs and put a spike in the middle of steering wheels. It's an extreme extrapolation but from a sound basis.
Anyway I agree wholeheartedly that it is the general standard of driving that's the problem not necessarily speed, though it is a definite factor.
In my experience cameras are for revenue generation, I don't know the stats but it would be interesting to know the accident figures in Wiltshire, both before and after they turned off all static speed cameras.....

Before I even started any driving lessons I took and passed my motorcycle test on a 50cc Honda scooter. Riding that around certainly makes you aware of the traffic. Some years ago I decided to buy a scooter, this time a 125cc Honda, to get to and from work and I went on a refresher course before riding it. It's certainly good experience for using the roads safely. Part of the problem with car driving these days that there are so many distractions in a modern car, Sat/Nav, radio, mobile phone (even if it's not hand-held). Too many things not actually related to driving the car. How often do you follow another driver only to see the driver constantly turning his or her head to look at their passenger when they are obviously talking to them.