[ QUOTE ]
simont said:
I agree David R. I will be very interested to hear VAG's 'Official' reasoning behind why they 'Promote'/favour understeer in their cars - especially when the road testers generally hate it and thus bring bad press to otherwise excellent cars.
[/ QUOTE ]
The problem (as I see it) is that road testers don't generally live in the real world. They thrash about in a car and expect everyone who drives anything with (air, figure, picked) 150BHP or more to want rear drive, oversteer and the kind of handling attitude that would see most of us (go on, admit it!) in the nearest hedge.
Autocar in particular have bashed the S3 (Audis in general) consistently, however they once did a summary piece and stated it was the sort of car they proffessionally shouldn't advise, but after spending a week with one they can see why people choose them over the competition.
Clarkson did a bit on the S3 a while back and rated it fairly highly, but did admit it was expensive.
Enough said really.
The A3 3.2 looks like it's aimed at the Golf VR6 4motion drivers, or similar ilk.
I'm not meaning to the diss the 3.2 in anyway. Audi is quite right their aim of the 3.2. They will want to ensure that the A3 based S/RS car is way above the current crop of increasing silly powered FWD hatches. The 3.2 isn't enough to do that in std. trim.
Brings me back to why I bought the S3, because, er, it's an S3 /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif