Car security CCTV at home

Phil3

Registered User
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
862
Points
113
I’m looking to install a single CCTV camera (possibly two) at the front of my house and it’s a field where I basically know nothing. I’ve tried to look about and have it down to these two;

6EB96E38 D485 4F09 865E BCCFF8B86ABC

B1654778 004A 4570 9009 5A1BF8836E2B

For those with more knowledge/experience in this... are they a good system? and which would you go for?

Or are there others for around the same price you’d recommend more? links?

Cheers
 
I’m looking to install a single CCTV camera (possibly two) at the front of my house and it’s a field where I basically know nothing. I’ve tried to look about and have it down to these two;

View attachment 148430

View attachment 148431

For those with more knowledge/experience in this... are they a good system? and which would you go for?

Or are there others for around the same price you’d recommend more? links?

Cheers

I have a previous model Swann bought in Screwfix 2 cameras but 4 Chanel hard drive . Looks similar . For the price about 200 quid works perfectly. Have it covering the front of my garage and drive . Allows me to monitor it real time from my phone . Hear a noise no more running outside in the cold . Easy to install and set up . Time consuming bit was running the cables from the cameras back to the box .downside my cameras at night not the greatest definition prob couldn’t make out faces but assume the bad guys will have masks . I’d buy the same again . It’s a budget system but it works .good deterrent .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil3
Get some Nest outdoor cameras. Better quality; easier to install. More features. Not some old person CCTV system from 1988 which looks **** on your phone.
 
Get some Nest outdoor cameras. Better quality; easier to install. More features. Not some old person CCTV system from 1988 which looks **** on your phone.

Quality on my phone is good . Not sure why you think it’s from 1988 did we have cctv streaming to our phones then . Could we buy a home system for 200 quid , I think not . Which features am I missing ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
@Jonny B Cheers for the info mate, I’ve got routes already planned out for the wiring etc so hopefully that should be a good start

@Spinstorm I've seem them and just scrolled past, I was assuming you would need the rest of the Nest systems installed, heating etc for everything to work properly
 
@Phil3 ALL Nest products are stand alone. I would add I work for Nest so I know all about them.

@Jonny B You need to see the quality to understand the difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil3
@Phil3 ALL Nest products are stand alone. I would add I work for Nest so I know all about them.

@Jonny B You need to see the quality to understand the difference.

I understand the difference . The nest system is more expensive , relies on an internet connection to record , requires a subscription to retrieve recordings .
I think simple is better with security . Each to their own of course.
The quality of the picture may be better but I only need to see someone is on my property not whether they had a shave before they came round.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: AB RS3, James 123, Spaceman_RS3 and 4 others
I’ve got the Swann Twin Pack but the slightly older model which I installed about 10 months ago. I bought it from B&Q, who no longer sell Swann products...

I have terrible issues, Camera 1 is intermittently shuffling its picture half way to the right so I can only see half of the image. Camera 2 is just black now, occasionally it comes back into life with a flickering image maybe 3/4 times a day.

I’ve contacted Swann who have asked for the model number on each camera, because the whole package model isn’t enough.. annoying!! So I need to source some steps to get up to the roof, nightmare..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil3
I have a few of the nest cams at home. One on the driveway. i have it setup so that if its after dark (bedtime) and it spots something it puts the lights on downstairs in the kitchen, that backs onto driveway....works really well. good picture/sound too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil3
I have the Netgear Arlo cameras which are also set to turn my lights on at night.
Not a bad system but is entirely battery operated and so only records when motion is detected and for a short while as otherwise the batteries last no time.
I'm looking at the new nest iq outdoor when it finally gets released over here. Has some cool features!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil3
@Phil3 I have installed the 2nd ones you linked at work and quality is great. Don't see why you would need anything more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jonny B and Phil3
I installed 2 Hikvision cameras and an NVR bought from here. Went for the 4Mp HD IP camera setup with an NVR recorder. These are professional grade cameras wired up with cat 5 cable which give really good pictures night and day. Had them a few years now and never had any issues.
http://www.cctvkits.co.uk/
Here is a video taken last year of some scrotes trying all the car doors on the estate. In the top right hand corner of the video is a white A4 that had been left open. They rifled through that but there was nothing to pinch. We have a Nightwatcher security light on the front that tracks you as you move.
http://nightwatcher.co.uk/
They didn't like that as a lot of these have CCTV cameras in them. Ours does but I don't use it as it's wireless and it interferes with all kinds of stuff.
They didn't touch our cars just wandered around to next door,

The quality is a lot better as you tube compresses the video, in the day you can read number plates of cars out in the road if you pause the recording.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jonny B and Phil3
If anyone wants free advice on high spec systems please message me. I’m a H&S Director for a company that specialise in high end CCTV for buildings and super yaughts. Yes some of our kit is overkill for what we as car owners could afford but I have design engineers who I can ask any questions you want.
Regards
Stu
 
  • Like
Reactions: drgav2005, Phil3, teslaboy and 1 other person
I am really sceptical when it comes to CCTV alone, these wa**ers will likely scout out the property or have a good look before going for anything, when they spot CCTV they will just cover there faces with a hood or balaclava and you will have pointless footage.

Personally I would get something like the ring floodlight cam, it only records when motion activates and you get notifications send to your phone the second it is triggered, the light is active at night which alone can scare people off, and you can also play a loud siren from it. They are around £250.

My opinion is that your best bet is a floodlight cam, house alarm and a big dog! (And perhaps the odd hidden weapon, rise of the foot soldier style!
 
I think the more you can do, the better. Security lights, alarm, CCTV, snap locks etc. The hope is that they look at all of that and think that they'd be better off moving onto another house.

Unfortunately the police just don't do enough. If there was the death sentence for stealing cars or going onto someone else's property, this just wouldn't be as much of a concern. Ok, so I'm being a bit OTT. But I know of a case where someone pulled up at a set of lights, a guy ran over and put a hammer through the drivers skull, drove off in the car and left him on the side of the road where he later died in hospital. He got 8yrs in prison. Scandalous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil3 and Spaceman_RS3
I installed 2 Hikvision cameras and an NVR bought from here. Went for the 4Mp HD IP camera setup with an NVR recorder. These are professional grade cameras wired up with cat 5 cable which give really good pictures night and day. Had them a few years now and never had any issues.
http://www.cctvkits.co.uk/
Here is a video taken last year of some scrotes trying all the car doors on the estate. In the top right hand corner of the video is a white A4 that had been left open. They rifled through that but there was nothing to pinch. We have a Nightwatcher security light on the front that tracks you as you move.
http://nightwatcher.co.uk/
They didn't like that as a lot of these have CCTV cameras in them. Ours does but I don't use it as it's wireless and it interferes with all kinds of stuff.
They didn't touch our cars just wandered around to next door,

The quality is a lot better as you tube compresses the video, in the day you can read number plates of cars out in the road if you pause the recording.

looks good even after compressed, though it proves they are a bit useless for identifying people as they just cover up but better than nothing i guess
 
I think the more you can do, the better. Security lights, alarm, CCTV, snap locks etc. The hope is that they look at all of that and think that they'd be better off moving onto another house.

Unfortunately the police just don't do enough. If there was the death sentence for stealing cars or going onto someone else's property, this just wouldn't be as much of a concern. Ok, so I'm being a bit OTT. But I know of a case where someone pulled up at a set of lights, a guy ran over and put a hammer through the drivers skull, drove off in the car and left him on the side of the road where he later died in hospital. He got 8yrs in prison. Scandalous.

Is that all, he will be out in 4 years
 
7e3951d552649659bf9997cfb2dea481.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Impressive setup but the quality of those images is not good. The comparison between Nest and all standard CCTV systems are not even worth it.

Sure if you want recording you have to pay for Nest and you do need internet. But a local stored CCTV system can be broken or stolen and the footage is gone. With Nest as soon as someone is near your property it will alert you. Indeed with the Outdoor IQ it will use facial recognition and tell you who is there and the IQ cameras have a 4K HDR sensor that means in direct sunlight and when its getting dark you can still see the detail.

And if your worried about your expensive car but don’t want to pay for a decent camera and £8 a month for recording; well that’s the same argument as me buying an RS3 and watching my MPG. It’s an excuse. :p
 
Impressive setup but the quality of those images is not good. The comparison between Nest and all standard CCTV systems are not even worth it.

Sure if you want recording you have to pay for Nest and you do need internet. But a local stored CCTV system can be broken or stolen and the footage is gone. With Nest as soon as someone is near your property it will alert you. Indeed with the Outdoor IQ it will use facial recognition and tell you who is there and the IQ cameras have a 4K HDR sensor that means in direct sunlight and when its getting dark you can still see the detail.

And if your worried about your expensive car but don’t want to pay for a decent camera and £8 a month for recording; well that’s the same argument as me buying an RS3 and watching my MPG. It’s an excuse. :p
You could use the same argument that someone could steal or delete your cloud stored content.

Whilst Wi-Fi cameras are easier to install you can't beat a wired camera. To make matters worse a nest is a Wi-Fi camera with content stored in the cloud all of which will degrade the picture even further.

If the cameras were identical then a Wired camera with locally stored content will be far far better than a Wi-Fi camera with content stored in the cloud
 
Last edited:
You could use the same argument that someone could steal or delete your cloud stored content.

Whilst Wi-Fi cameras are easier to install you can't beat a wired camera. To make matters worse a nest is a Wi-Fi camera with content stored in the cloud all of which will degrade the picture even further.

If the cameras were identical then a Wired camera with locally stored content will be far far better than a Wi-Fi camera with content stored in the cloud

This is incorrect information. The data is stored securely in the cloud. And you can save it and download it on your phone, tablet or even through social media. IF someone goes NEAR your car or driveway you IMMEDIATELY get an alert and you can talk to them through the camera. They won't get close enough to do anything and even if they did break or damage your wifi camera - in this example Nest - the footage is already saved in the cloud and on your phone.

As for quality - LOL - the Nest quality is noticeably sharper, clearer and higher resolution than any standard CCTV camera system. Did you read I said 4k HDR? normal wired cameras look like a 70's porno. You need to see it first hand to comment :)
 
Thieves had an attempt at stealing my car last year. They tried to break in to steal the keys but I heard them trying to get through the front door. On the same night my sister (lives 25 miles away) had her house broken into and they took her handbag, purse, phone car keys etc. Her house had CCTV surveillance and captured the images of the two burglars calmly covering the floodlight and getting in through the front door. They were never caught despite having two and half minutes of footage.
The point I am making here is that it doesn't seem to matter how good or sophisticated your CCTV equipment is, all you will get is images of your property getting stolen. Unless the thieves are novices, the police never seem to catch them because they cover their faces/wear hoodies/gloves etc so that they can't be identified. CCTV does not deter them, thats why Youtube is full of videos of cars getting stolen.

I believe you are better off investing in good protection of house doors/door panels (they lever them out), window openings, deadlocks (good old fashioned door bolts are good), even alarm the ground floor of your house perhaps? As for the car, consider fitting AW Ghost and maybe even a visual deterent like a Disklok on the steering wheel. (they cant tell Ghost is fitted so will still attempt to steal the car). Place your keys in a metal box (with lid) or signal protector at night to prevent external code grabbing of your key fob (those with Audi Advance Key).

If they manage to get in, I have a 1000 lumens strobe light next to the bed which will briefly stun their vision just enough so that I can deliver surprise number two (which I wont describe on this forum). Probably another good reason for not having CCTV is to not record images of me dishing out some punishment before the police turn up. :gun2:
 
  • Like
Reactions: voorhees, T-800, James 123 and 2 others
Thieves had an attempt at stealing my car last year. They tried to break in to steal the keys but I heard them trying to get through the front door. On the same night my sister (lives 25 miles away) had her house broken into and they took her handbag, purse, phone car keys etc. Her house had CCTV surveillance and captured the images of the two burglars calmly covering the floodlight and getting in through the front door. They were never caught despite having two and half minutes of footage.
The point I am making here is that it doesn't seem to matter how good or sophisticated your CCTV equipment is, all you will get is images of your property getting stolen. Unless the thieves are novices, the police never seem to catch them because they cover their faces/wear hoodies/gloves etc so that they can't be identified. CCTV does not deter them, thats why Youtube is full of videos of cars getting stolen.

I believe you are better off investing in good protection of house doors/door panels (they lever them out), window openings, deadlocks (good old fashioned door bolts are good), even alarm the ground floor of your house perhaps? As for the car, consider fitting AW Ghost and maybe even a visual deterent like a Disklok on the steering wheel. (they cant tell Ghost is fitted so will still attempt to steal the car). Place your keys in a metal box (with lid) or signal protector at night to prevent external code grabbing of your key fob (those with Audi Advance Key).

If they manage to get in, I have a 1000 lumens strobe light next to the bed which will briefly stun their vision just enough so that I can deliver surprise number two (which I wont describe on this forum). Probably another good reason for not having CCTV is to not record images of me dishing out some punishment before the police turn up. :gun2:

Actually what your saying is you need a big dog to scare them off actually! lol
 
Thieves had an attempt at stealing my car last year. They tried to break in to steal the keys but I heard them trying to get through the front door. On the same night my sister (lives 25 miles away) had her house broken into and they took her handbag, purse, phone car keys etc. Her house had CCTV surveillance and captured the images of the two burglars calmly covering the floodlight and getting in through the front door. They were never caught despite having two and half minutes of footage.
The point I am making here is that it doesn't seem to matter how good or sophisticated your CCTV equipment is, all you will get is images of your property getting stolen. Unless the thieves are novices, the police never seem to catch them because they cover their faces/wear hoodies/gloves etc so that they can't be identified. CCTV does not deter them, thats why Youtube is full of videos of cars getting stolen.

I believe you are better off investing in good protection of house doors/door panels (they lever them out), window openings, deadlocks (good old fashioned door bolts are good), even alarm the ground floor of your house perhaps? As for the car, consider fitting AW Ghost and maybe even a visual deterent like a Disklok on the steering wheel. (they cant tell Ghost is fitted so will still attempt to steal the car). Place your keys in a metal box (with lid) or signal protector at night to prevent external code grabbing of your key fob (those with Audi Advance Key).

If they manage to get in, I have a 1000 lumens strobe light next to the bed which will briefly stun their vision just enough so that I can deliver surprise number two (which I wont describe on this forum). Probably another good reason for not having CCTV is to not record images of me dishing out some punishment before the police turn up. :gun2:

I love a plan ;)
 
I have a big husky but he isn't scary. However he looks scary so even though he would probably just lick the burglar they would probably run away anyway :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: AudiNutta
Actually what your saying is you need a big dog to scare them off actually! lol

I was kind of thinking that maybe the dog could eat them? Or at least chew on them a little bit before the police arrive.:sign yum:

Problem is....... I can't be doing with picking up a freshly laid doggy doo and placing it in a bag. They may be man's best friend and all that, but I draw the line at walking about with bags of dog dirt in my pocket. Makes me gag at the thought of it. :puke2:
 
  • Like
Reactions: AudiNutta
Had a quick look at the Nest offerings. Wow they are expensive for what they are. The cheaper outdoor cameras are only IP65 a minimum spec for weatherproof . The more expensive outdoor camera the IQ is IP66 so better but not IP67 which is what you really need for a camera that's fully exposed to the weather in this country.
They may have a 4K sensor but the max resolution is only 1920 x 1080. Each camera will use 2 meg bandwidth on your internet, So if you don't have a decent internet speed you will be struggling. Wireless connections don't work well in older properties or larger properties, you can't beat a good cat5 cable.
There is no information on the IR range of the cameras, as a lot of the time the things you want to see will be happening at night.
Outside our house is pretty much pitch black without the floodlight on. The nearest street light is in the top right of the picture there is only 1 light in the road. Yet the night performance is excellent thanks to the very high power IR LED's 30m range. Have a look at that video I posted earlier.
The cameras I have are 4K and provide 2688 x1520 resolution at 20fps or lower resolutions at higher frame rates.
The Nest camera has some nice features but if CCTV is what you need it wouldn't be my choice.
4K HDR POE IP camera with 30m IR £79 IP67 weatherproof . There is a link to the datasheet
http://www.cctvkits.co.uk/hiwatch-ipc-d140-4mp-ip-turret-dome-camera-with-30m-ir-and-poe.html
 
Had a quick look at the Nest offerings. Wow they are expensive for what they are. The cheaper outdoor cameras are only IP65 a minimum spec for weatherproof . The more expensive outdoor camera the IQ is IP66 so better but not IP67 which is what you really need for a camera that's fully exposed to the weather in this country.
They may have a 4K sensor but the max resolution is only 1920 x 1080. Each camera will use 2 meg bandwidth on your internet, So if you don't have a decent internet speed you will be struggling. Wireless connections don't work well in older properties or larger properties, you can't beat a good cat5 cable.
There is no information on the IR range of the cameras, as a lot of the time the things you want to see will be happening at night.
Outside our house is pretty much pitch black without the floodlight on. The nearest street light is in the top right of the picture there is only 1 light in the road. Yet the night performance is excellent thanks to the very high power IR LED's 30m range. Have a look at that video I posted earlier.
The cameras I have are 4K and provide 2688 x1520 resolution at 20fps or lower resolutions at higher frame rates.
The Nest camera has some nice features but if CCTV is what you need it wouldn't be my choice.
4K HDR POE IP camera with 30m IR £79 IP67 weatherproof . There is a link to the datasheet
http://www.cctvkits.co.uk/hiwatch-ipc-d140-4mp-ip-turret-dome-camera-with-30m-ir-and-poe.html

"Had a quick look at the Nest offerings. Wow they are expensive for what they are. The cheaper outdoor cameras are only IP65 a minimum spec for weatherproof . The more expensive outdoor camera the IQ is IP66 so better but not IP67 which is what you really need for a camera that's fully exposed to the weather in this country."

Your paying for quality - once again it’s like comparing our Audi’s to a Dacia. If you have Nest products you realise they are worth the extra. It’s not about a rush to the lowest price point.

The cameras are only mot the full IP67 because they have speakers and microphones for two way communication. I have had Nest cameras for years and there are no issues.


They may have a 4K sensor but the max resolution is only 1920 x 1080. Each camera will use 2 meg bandwidth on your internet, So if you don't have a decent internet speed you will be struggling. Wireless connections don't work well in older properties or larger properties, you can't beat a good cat5 cable.

You are correct the IQ cameras don’t stream at 4K - but they use the extra sensor resolution for the HDR feature and also for something called supersight where the camera automatically zooms in on motion it detects and uses the algorithm for face recognition.

As far as Wi-fi signal goes; that’s down to the rubbish routers you were given by your internet company. If your signal drops or doesn’t reach certain areas of your house you need a better router. I’d personally recommend a mesh router system.


There is no information on the IR range of the cameras, as a lot of the time the things you want to see will be happening at night.
Outside our house is pretty much pitch black without the floodlight on. The nearest street light is in the top right of the picture there is only 1 light in the road. Yet the night performance is excellent thanks to the very high power IR LED's 30m range. Have a look at that video I posted earlier.

Your correct on saying that there is no information on the range as the range is effected as you said yourself by what’s around the camera and the quality of the sensor. You will find that the quality is as good as your going to get and class leading.

The cameras I have are 4K and provide 2688 x1520 resolution at 20fps or lower resolutions at higher frame rates.
The Nest camera has some nice features but if CCTV is what you need it wouldn't be my choice.
4K HDR POE IP camera with 30m IR £79 IP67 weatherproof . There is a link to the datasheet
http://www.cctvkits.co.uk/hiwatch-ipc-d140-4mp-ip-turret-dome-camera-with-30m-ir-and-poe.html

My response here is again one of quality - there is no way that the image quality is comparable with the Nest cameras. You may think that it would be but it is not.

Looking at your video you posted that’s pretty good night vision but not as good as Nest Cam outdoor IQ at 1080p.

Again don’t get me wrong. You may not want to spend that much on cameras, you may not want a new router, you may not want to pay a monthly charge for recording. But these are simply examples of us choosing what’s important to spend money on. And if your reason is you can’t afford it (in general) or don’t feel it’s worthit then that’s your choice and you ultimately decide what you purchase.

What I can tell you is that Nest cameras receive updates in the cloud and features are added regularly and they can control other things in your home as well. So your getting premium build and quality and image excellence about what any standard CCTV system can do currently.
 
I have 60kg of Rhodesian ridgeback, he’s always on patrol in the bay windows - nicely visible hehe
 
  • Like
Reactions: voorhees and AudiNutta
"Had a quick look at the Nest offerings. Wow they are expensive for what they are. The cheaper outdoor cameras are only IP65 a minimum spec for weatherproof . The more expensive outdoor camera the IQ is IP66 so better but not IP67 which is what you really need for a camera that's fully exposed to the weather in this country."

Your paying for quality - once again it’s like comparing our Audi’s to a Dacia. If you have Nest products you realise they are worth the extra. It’s not about a rush to the lowest price point.

The cameras are only mot the full IP67 because they have speakers and microphones for two way communication. I have had Nest cameras for years and there are no issues.


They may have a 4K sensor but the max resolution is only 1920 x 1080. Each camera will use 2 meg bandwidth on your internet, So if you don't have a decent internet speed you will be struggling. Wireless connections don't work well in older properties or larger properties, you can't beat a good cat5 cable.

You are correct the IQ cameras don’t stream at 4K - but they use the extra sensor resolution for the HDR feature and also for something called supersight where the camera automatically zooms in on motion it detects and uses the algorithm for face recognition.

As far as Wi-fi signal goes; that’s down to the rubbish routers you were given by your internet company. If your signal drops or doesn’t reach certain areas of your house you need a better router. I’d personally recommend a mesh router system.


There is no information on the IR range of the cameras, as a lot of the time the things you want to see will be happening at night.
Outside our house is pretty much pitch black without the floodlight on. The nearest street light is in the top right of the picture there is only 1 light in the road. Yet the night performance is excellent thanks to the very high power IR LED's 30m range. Have a look at that video I posted earlier.

Your correct on saying that there is no information on the range as the range is effected as you said yourself by what’s around the camera and the quality of the sensor. You will find that the quality is as good as your going to get and class leading.

The cameras I have are 4K and provide 2688 x1520 resolution at 20fps or lower resolutions at higher frame rates.
The Nest camera has some nice features but if CCTV is what you need it wouldn't be my choice.
4K HDR POE IP camera with 30m IR £79 IP67 weatherproof . There is a link to the datasheet
http://www.cctvkits.co.uk/hiwatch-ipc-d140-4mp-ip-turret-dome-camera-with-30m-ir-and-poe.html

My response here is again one of quality - there is no way that the image quality is comparable with the Nest cameras. You may think that it would be but it is not.

Looking at your video you posted that’s pretty good night vision but not as good as Nest Cam outdoor IQ at 1080p.

Again don’t get me wrong. You may not want to spend that much on cameras, you may not want a new router, you may not want to pay a monthly charge for recording. But these are simply examples of us choosing what’s important to spend money on. And if your reason is you can’t afford it (in general) or don’t feel it’s worthit then that’s your choice and you ultimately decide what you purchase.

What I can tell you is that Nest cameras receive updates in the cloud and features are added regularly and they can control other things in your home as well. So your getting premium build and quality and image excellence about what any standard CCTV system can do currently.

You mean cat 6 cable. Pointless using cat5 nowadays, min should be cat 5e or 6. Poor wifi isn't always about the rubbish router your ISP provided, issues are often
a) poor consumer aftermarket routers - theyre all rubbish including the netgear nighthawk range, asus dual band, Linksys (rebranded Belkin), etc but decent commercial ones are £600+
b) poor router placement
c) walls - especially solid walls
d) windows
e) interference from other devices on same band
 
Last edited:
I use a clever dog camera from ebay, it was £20 and its stuck on the outside of an upstairs window, been there since November and still going strong
 
You mean cat 6 cable. Pointless using cat5 nowadays, min should be cat 5e or 6. Poor wifi isn't always about the rubbish router your ISP provided, issues are often
a) poor consumer aftermarket routers - theyre all rubbish including the netgear nighthawk range, asus dual band, Linksys (rebranded Belkin), etc but decent commercial ones are £600+
b) poor router placement
c) walls - especially solid walls
d) windows
e) interference from other devices on same band

All of these problems are things that your router shouldn’t have. And are because your router is rubbish.

I use Google Wifi. It is one of the mesh WiFi systems. It solves all those problems.

It extends the networks to pretty much any size by adding satellite units so it goes through walls and windows and automatically changes bands to avoid interference.

It costs around £229 for two units. There are similar systems available from Netgear, BT, Linksys etc. I would never recommend a traditional router to anyone again. And I’d never use the router provided by the ISP and complain that the walls are to blame. It’s the router for being too rubbish to cope!
 
You mean cat 6 cable. Pointless using cat5 nowadays, min should be cat 5e or 6. Poor wifi isn't always about the rubbish router your ISP provided, issues are often
I call any Ethernet twisted pair cable cat 5 , I am showing my age, it's a generic term. TBH with a POE IP 4meg camera you could happily use cat 5 cable to wire from the camera to the NVR which is what I was saying. The data rate is only 5-6 Mbps on a 1080P camera , no where near the 100Mbps that old school cat 5 will support.
 
All of these problems are things that your router shouldn’t have. And are because your router is rubbish.

I use Google Wifi. It is one of the mesh WiFi systems. It solves all those problems.

It extends the networks to pretty much any size by adding satellite units so it goes through walls and windows and automatically changes bands to avoid interference.

It costs around £229 for two units. There are similar systems available from Netgear, BT, Linksys etc. I would never recommend a traditional router to anyone again. And I’d never use the router provided by the ISP and complain that the walls are to blame. It’s the router for being too rubbish to cope!

Sounds like some of you guys on here really know your stuff on what equipment to use.

Can I ask if a signal jammer would block your WiFi signal and take down the system? The reason I ask is that where we have technology, there always seems to be a way of defeating it. I know people who have used signal jammers (illegal to use) just to prevent mobile phone cheats during pub quiz nights.
If used by thieves, would these jamming devices be a potential threat to the systems you describe in the above posts?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
T-800
T
Replies
2
Views
979
NHN
E
Replies
164
Views
10K