- Joined
- Jan 22, 2003
- Messages
- 2,165
- Reaction score
- 1,433
- Points
- 113
Have a read of this.
I'm no lawyer but it seems to me that the risk of not declaring mods to an insurer has now been reduced in certain cases where the mod clearly has no relevance to the claim. For example the fairly common (?) dpf delete on diesel cars. In an accident it would be hard for an insurer to reject the claim based on non-disclosure (and declaring 'no modifications) because I can't see how the dpf delete itself could be considered as relevant to the cause of the accident.
I'm no lawyer but it seems to me that the risk of not declaring mods to an insurer has now been reduced in certain cases where the mod clearly has no relevance to the claim. For example the fairly common (?) dpf delete on diesel cars. In an accident it would be hard for an insurer to reject the claim based on non-disclosure (and declaring 'no modifications) because I can't see how the dpf delete itself could be considered as relevant to the cause of the accident.
