Would the plane take off?

Caesium

My BM is fixed!
VCDS Map User
Joined
May 26, 2004
Messages
4,877
Reaction score
5
OutLore said:
Having said that - why dont they use conveyor belts on aircraft carriers?

Because we "the british" invented this baby..
riatpic.jpg


AND this one...
2006_4_35.jpg


We don't need no silly reversing conveyer belts, like some sort of ****** up tescos till in reverse! hehe
 

Onlyme

Registered User
Joined
Oct 24, 2006
Messages
593
Reaction score
1
In the second picture are they all raising cups of tea ?
 

Beerzo

Masa'warty 3200... Talk To Me!
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
1,241
Reaction score
0
2006_4_35.jpg

I think the guy standing in the middle is like:
"Ok Lads one conker going in the launch catapult!"
 

OutLore

VOIP Dude
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Messages
1,206
Reaction score
2
A4Quattro said:
Because we "the british" invented this baby..

AND this one...

We don't need no silly reversing conveyer belts, like some sort of ****** up tescos till in reverse! hehe


LOL... I know we invented them, but have you ever tried to land a Harrier on a moving carrier?

Also - the catapult only works for take-offs... you have to rely on 4 elastic bands for landing, not an exact art either!!!

If they had a conveyor in reverse, according to all those who think the plane wont take off, you will be able to land on the conveyor belt and the plane will simply stop. Then all you have to do is to slow the conveyor belt down and bob's your uncle....

haha
 

scoTTy

Registered User
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
1,967
Reaction score
12
I thought I proved this off good and proper. Who's still argueing about it?

You crazy fools!
 

TDI-line

Uber Post Whore
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Messages
9,763
Reaction score
1,866
Same old Fools ScoTTy.
 

Bascule

Registered User
Joined
Nov 9, 2006
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Hey ScoTTy - you did prove it, for sure.
P.S. any idea when you're going to be moving on to a new motor? I'd love to be in the queue for potential purchasers...! That Miltek sounds sweet and its got to be one of the very best maintained!
 

audialec

Registered User
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
robthehungrymonkey said:
no, no matter how fast the "runway" is moving, the air won't be flowing over the wing fast enough to generate the required lift. but...

with the engines on, the plane would be going forwards at the same rate as it would be with a static runway, with only the added drag from the wheels moving twice as fast. So it would take off.

I think!
No the plane will not take off without the pressure difference above/below the wing due to airflow.
Tell you what though that runway would be very handy for testing out your top speed wouldnt it?
 

ChriS3

hud at ye bam
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
2,239
Reaction score
32
Right, can't be hooped to read through all this and see if a conclusion was reached but I think it's finally sorted....

runway.gif
 

TDI-line

Uber Post Whore
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Messages
9,763
Reaction score
1,866
Oh yeah, i see now.
 

jojo

Looking for Boost!
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Sep 4, 2003
Messages
29,099
Reaction score
3,836
Yeeees, we have lift off!










Are the wheels still on there?
 

ChriS3

hud at ye bam
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
2,239
Reaction score
32
Wheels? Who cares about wheels? Wheels give traction, but planes need thrust. Oh no, I'm getting sucked into the debate.............
 
Top