[ QUOTE ]
Ronny,
Think this has been covered before, if you did not notice a big difference it was clearly because there is already a problem with your car, as for the cost it may only take a few mins but you need to remember that the cost is for all the development time that went into the code, rr would be good but lets face it, it's driveability that counts and the difference is amazing, I would suggest you get your car looked at to solve your existing problem, not just saying this as I have Revo but would say the same for any of the major players in the re-mapping business, maybe you should not slag it off although it is an open forum but from your previous posts on a similar topic you did not reply to any of the points raised about your car.......
Maybe you need to get your car in order before you speak up.............. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shutup.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
I didnt see your replies to my other post ages ago, but then I cannot monitor every thread.
There is nothing wrong with my car, and its not the fact it costs 500 quid, its because they dont rolling road it, so they can show you the difference. That's all i complained about, and the fact my car is pushing approx 150bhp with no fault codes read from VAG-COM shows the car is fine. So don't give me that MAF pony.
Tell me what could be wrong with my car then? it boosts ok, it runs better when i put optimax in. but the difference with the REVO was not "amazing" but maybe he didnt do it properly? who knows. you will never know unless they RR it.
I am just giving my opinion of REVO, I have seen plenty of oither posts praising them, so my 1 post is not going to change peoples opinions, plus REVO give you a test of their software first, which means you can easily make your own mind up for free.
