No, I like options that actually have a meaning and use - not just to overcome sheer laziness, or where there is little actual benefit
Having worked in Automotive Engineering for years, Automotive Engineers are amongst the worst for thinking "just because you can, you should". I could cite numerous examples of overthinking features and options which have led to mass confusion and disaster. Now everything is on CAN it's relatively easy to make the car do anything you want. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
Electric Windows - Very useful for winding down the passenger side on a misty morning. Never had any hardship winding the driver side window down.
Electric Mirrors - Again, very useful for adjusting the passenger side. No hardship with the lever that came through the window on the driver side.
Electric start - yep, allowed women to drive, so this one is debatable
Power Steering - to a degree - yes, but now, having driven both the variable ratio and standard rack - the variable ratio actually is worse and less instinctive to drive with, so I would say the variable rack is not progress in the S3
Blind Spot detection - I would argue that the look over the shoulder is fundemental to driving, and in this respect promotes laziness and reliance upon technology as a substitution for good basic roadcraft
Hold Assist - the footbrake is a primary driving function - again I want to feel connected with my foot, onto the footbrake. Too many times I've seen drivers jump out of cars with HA into cars without HA, then take their foot off the footbrake at the lights only to realise that the car isn't braking for them. It's a primary driving control ***.
A useful option is one that demonstrates benefit (eg: starter motor) and not promote laziness on driving and roadcraft, and doesn't detract from the Primary Driving Controls of a car.
Otherwise go the whole hog and roll on the Google Driverless Cars - much safer, not this halfway house rubbish