1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Have you heard the S4/S5 rumour...

LeMans Jan 19, 2019

  1. cuke2u

    cuke2u Well-Known Member TFSI Owners Group saloon Audi A4 S-line owners group

    11,841
    4,801
    113
    X3man and SMI77 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Google AdSense Advertisement


  3. cuke2u

    cuke2u Well-Known Member TFSI Owners Group saloon Audi A4 S-line owners group

    11,841
    4,801
    113
    X3man likes this.
  4. alFR

    alFR Active Member Audi A4

    231
    77
    28
    This all just makes the S4 decision more baffling. Lord knows what they were thinking, be interesting to hear the real reasons if they ever do come out.
     
    X3man likes this.
  5. cuke2u

    cuke2u Well-Known Member TFSI Owners Group saloon Audi A4 S-line owners group

    11,841
    4,801
    113
    A glut of diesel engines?
     
    X3man and CHEZ like this.
  6. CHEZ

    CHEZ moderately amusing Supporter

    5,905
    1,246
    113

    This has been my thinking.
    Warehouses full of stock piled diesel units.
    Porsche dropped them, so I presume that left a lot of surplus units too just to add to it
     
    Simonwhite2000, X3man and cuke2u like this.
  7. cuke2u

    cuke2u Well-Known Member TFSI Owners Group saloon Audi A4 S-line owners group

    11,841
    4,801
    113
    SMI77 and Daggerit like this.
  8. Daggerit

    Daggerit Well-Known Member Team Floret Silver TFSI Owners Group Team V6 Audi S4 Audi Avant Owner Group quattro

    3,126
    1,598
    113
    My interpretation of this is that it's actually the gearbox rather than the engine. Seems to improve Drive->Sport->Manual modes on the box in the article so I imagine that it's down to the terrible ZF programming from Audi rather than the outright engine performance. Could be wrong but I can't understand how a 900Nm engine could feel like it didn't have much punch otherwise.
     
    X3man and SMI77 like this.
  9. SMI77

    SMI77 Australia Audi S4 Audi Avant Owner Group quattro

    519
    264
    63
    https://www.audi-mediacenter.com/en/press-releases/top-performance-the-audi-sq8-tdi-11814
    Unfortunately do not appear to be able to find the maximum torque split for this model. Believe I have commented before where engineers have felt for self-preservation, the safe limit for rear ends, particularly in the lower gears is 700nm = 77.77% of the vehicle's 900nm. Taking that further, it may well be if the max. split to the rear is greater than 77%, the ECU may restrict all 900nm being unleashed until a predetermined point that the drivetrain, incl gearbox, can handle. Also, incorporated in that, the EPC could easily be adjusted to not provide the normal 250-300 millisecond response.
    Audi's version of mild-hybrid is quite pathetic, but perhaps wait for findings on a lower model.


    At 40mins he discusses the "lack of punch"
    It IS an SUV!!!

    https://www.motor1.com/news/357597/audi-s8-arrives-563-hp/
    Have absolutely know idea why the S8 lobs with a dirty, guzzling, petrol V8, worldwide. Interestingly, no Audi Media Centre release to date.
    We know EU6 is based on the average of the automaker's fleet sold in Europe. Perhaps Audi think they will not sell enough S8's in Europe to go under the benchmark? Who knows, chances of a Petrolgate down the line??
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2019
  10. Dippy

    Dippy Well-Known Member Team Monsoon Audi S5 Black Edition

    1,784
    1,256
    113
    Those ZF gearboxes may be good, but they are still based on the torque converter principle and until the lock-up clutch engages there is a soft link between the engine and the transmission. Quoting figures from a factory engine dyno does not tell the whole story and we never seem to see the true extend of transmission losses.
     
  11. cuke2u

    cuke2u Well-Known Member TFSI Owners Group saloon Audi A4 S-line owners group

    11,841
    4,801
    113
    Whilst that is true it will still mean that a instant response they claim this engine technology will be capable of has been wasted. Therefore they've, once again, shot themselves in the foot..
     
  12. Avatar

    Google AdSense Advertisement


  13. cuke2u

    cuke2u Well-Known Member TFSI Owners Group saloon Audi A4 S-line owners group

    11,841
    4,801
    113
  14. Daggerit

    Daggerit Well-Known Member Team Floret Silver TFSI Owners Group Team V6 Audi S4 Audi Avant Owner Group quattro

    3,126
    1,598
    113
    Yes, but if you're running that theory then a manual or dual clutch is the same because the clutch will be slipping initially before it's fully engaged. I don't think that's a very good arguement because no ICE vehicle will have zero slip from the engine/transmission interface (the crazy solutions of things like the Koenigsegg Regera aside...) and all will have some transmission losses with modern torque converters being far more efficient than days of old.

    True, but along the same lines as above, you're always going to have some slip off the line. I think the main advantage of the 'instant' response is when you're already moving and transition from off throttle to on throttle through a corner or something. That's my understanding anyway, as in a launch condition you'd build boost before going so the system is redundant versus a traditional turbo setup.
     
  15. cuke2u

    cuke2u Well-Known Member TFSI Owners Group saloon Audi A4 S-line owners group

    11,841
    4,801
    113
    Well the title of the review might also suggest the engine, however any form of lag, which the review claims is 2-3 secs, and this isn't slip off the line either, will have the keyboard warriors in this forum stating it is dangerous. I don't remember you stating this with your engine/gearbox combo by the way, however I might be wrong.
    Back to my point, why then install an engine which Audi claim has technology to 'eliminate' lag, then 'engineer' it back in unless they know something we don't...
     
    Daggerit likes this.
  16. Dippy

    Dippy Well-Known Member Team Monsoon Audi S5 Black Edition

    1,784
    1,256
    113
    I'm not sure what point you are making. Of course all clutches slip when engaging, but in a dual clutch gearbox the effect on torque transmission is very slight. For ZF's own DCT they claim 100-300ms between shifts. But as you know, a torque converter relies on slip for its very principle of operation: There is always a difference in rotational speed between the impeller and turbine and torque transmission is proportional to the slip speed. The losses are reduced due to the action of the lock-up clutch, but of course that only engages when the slippage is no longer needed for acceleration, i.e. when cruising.
     
  17. Daggerit

    Daggerit Well-Known Member Team Floret Silver TFSI Owners Group Team V6 Audi S4 Audi Avant Owner Group quattro

    3,126
    1,598
    113
    Pretty sure it locks up basically when you would have the clutch fully engaged in a normal transmission, that’s my point. So apart from the very initial acceleration from a standstill you should have relatively similar slip. Yes, the slush box is slower at the actual shifting, but that’s not the actual issue here. Having come from an S-tronic car to the S4, the difference in shift speed is basically unnoticeable.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  18. cuke2u

    cuke2u Well-Known Member TFSI Owners Group saloon Audi A4 S-line owners group

    11,841
    4,801
    113
    SMI77 likes this.
  19. Dippy

    Dippy Well-Known Member Team Monsoon Audi S5 Black Edition

    1,784
    1,256
    113
    That's quite a good article @cuke2u

    @Daggerit - The question is not how fast the gears are selected. As I noted ZF quote 200-300ms for their own DCT. I haven't seen figures for their TC auto boxes, but it must be similar. After all it is simply a matter of engaging or releasing brake or clutch pack in combination to change the configuration of the planetary gears. However the key difference between DCT and TC boxes is that when torque transfer is required, i.e. there is acceleration demand, the DCT is transmitting the torque through an engaged clutch pack whilst the TC box is transmitting it through a fluid. Whilst the fluid method works well, an indeed has the benefit of torque multiplication when there is a high slip speed, it simply cannot be as responsive to changes in torque transfer as the engaged clutch pack of a DCT. But I do not know the intricacies of the most modern design TC boxes and am ready to accept that they are very good. I am just making the point in direct response to the above discussion following the review of the SQ8 which has criticised its responsiveness. I still believe that at least part of the problem is the simple fact that there is elasticity in a TC gearbox which is why they have had the label "slush box".
     
    SMI77 and Daggerit like this.
  20. Daggerit

    Daggerit Well-Known Member Team Floret Silver TFSI Owners Group Team V6 Audi S4 Audi Avant Owner Group quattro

    3,126
    1,598
    113
    I see what you mean. I’m going on the assumption that when you want that acceleration demand the automatic transmission is likely already locked so should be full transfer of torque. Unless you’re trying to do a dig from 20mph in which case I’ll concede it’ll likely slip more than its dual clutch counterpart. Basically just meaning that in normal driving the gearbox itself shouldn’t be what causes the lag described in the original article.

    Software for the gearbox could definitely be the cause. As could the engine management software. I’m just not convinced the physical limitations of either the engine or the driveline is enough to cause the delay and really it’s likely down to Audi’s choice of programming.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    SMI77 likes this.
  21. SMI77

    SMI77 Australia Audi S4 Audi Avant Owner Group quattro

    519
    264
    63
    A US review, so the S4 with the real engine.
     
  22. Robbe

    Robbe Well-Known Member Team Daytona Team V6 Audi S4 Audi A4

    377
    390
    63
  23. Zippytoo

    Zippytoo Active Member

    106
    85
    28
    So, the latest update in the 'never-ending' saga of my S4 lease order, placed early April 2018 (!), is that the base price for the new S4 TDI is confirmed per Robbe's email link, above (thanks Robbe): a round £48000 ROTR, without options.

    However, the full UK price list, with all possible options, is still not available (should have been at the end of June) and therefore still not available to order (should have been this week, w/c 8th July). My dealer was pretty hopeful that I would have it by September but I'm guessing that the usual summer production line closure is imminent, so who knows?! If I do get it in September, it will be at least 17 months from order to delivery. I could probably have got a hand built Bugatti delivered more quickly :blink:!
     
    X3man likes this.
  24. RB84

    RB84 Active Member

    155
    38
    28
    So from what I can see the only free colour is now white? Not even a flat black?
    And the interior options are black or grey, no red?
    Entry area lights are now seemingly £115 option?

    Fair play that the standard wheels look better than the ones I had on mine, but those are surprising changes to me.

    Zippy - not sure how you've handled the wait!!
     
  25. Zippytoo

    Zippytoo Active Member

    106
    85
    28
    I've only stayed put because: a) it's a lease; b) it was already a good deal, it's price protected and with additional standard equipment (including 5 spoke V alloys, reversing camera, VCP, Audi phone box & wireless charging and privacy glass), plus the general price increase, it's now an even better deal; and c) VWFS have extended (and kept on extending) my Golf R lease. Still been painful though!
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2019
    Simonwhite2000, X3man and RB84 like this.
  26. cuke2u

    cuke2u Well-Known Member TFSI Owners Group saloon Audi A4 S-line owners group

    11,841
    4,801
    113
    You do realise that is a german configurator, not uk or any other country, thus the options available to other countries may well be different...
     
    RB84 likes this.
  27. Zippytoo

    Zippytoo Active Member

    106
    85
    28
    It is the German site but the UK prices are apparently correct, according to my dealer. It's just that not all of the options have been loaded yet.
     
  28. cuke2u

    cuke2u Well-Known Member TFSI Owners Group saloon Audi A4 S-line owners group

    11,841
    4,801
    113
    I would wait until the UK one is out, all the options for every model looks out...
     
  29. X3man

    X3man Well known member Gold Supporter X3 M40i Carbon Black

    5,609
    6,972
    113
    I honestly salute your patience @Zippytoo, you are way way more patient than I have or will ever be. I really hope it comes soon and that the wait has been worthwhile
     
  30. Zippytoo

    Zippytoo Active Member

    106
    85
    28
    Forgot to say that I got a sneak preview of the dealer info release for the A4, including UK spec changes (though not the official brochure, it does confirm the new standard equipment on the S4 I referenced above). It was just the prices that were missing and waiting confirmation.
     
  31. Zippytoo

    Zippytoo Active Member

    106
    85
    28
  32. DaveW

    DaveW Well-Known Member Team Floret Silver Audi A6 Audi Avant Owner Group S-line owners group

    1,299
    600
    113
  33. Avatar

    Google AdSense Advertisement


  34. Simonwhite2000

    Simonwhite2000 2017 S5 Coupe Daytona Grey

    577
    401
    63
    I dont think it was expected for it to receive bad reviews I think the general consensus was more the fact it was going from petrol to diesel and thus changing the whole nature of the car and many who had the petrol wouldnt want a diesel one. I actually think in day to day driving this will be quicker - it will certainly feel that way.
    What I did notice when reading through the autocar review was how fussy the front end now looks - not a fan.
     
    X3man likes this.
  35. Dippy

    Dippy Well-Known Member Team Monsoon Audi S5 Black Edition

    1,784
    1,256
    113
    I find it slightly strange that the designers went to the effort of adding the electric compressor, yet based on those reviews it is not big enough to fully compensate for the turbo lag. Missed opportunity?
     
    X3man likes this.
  36. Simonwhite2000

    Simonwhite2000 2017 S5 Coupe Daytona Grey

    577
    401
    63
    20190717_185138.jpg
     
  37. cuke2u

    cuke2u Well-Known Member TFSI Owners Group saloon Audi A4 S-line owners group

    11,841
    4,801
    113
    :puke2::puke2::puke2:don't understand why they haven't, at least, made the outputs symmetrical or none at all. Unfortunately it smacks of cost saving...
     
    X3man likes this.
  38. LeMans

    LeMans Member

    86
    34
    18
    X3man likes this.
  39. cuke2u

    cuke2u Well-Known Member TFSI Owners Group saloon Audi A4 S-line owners group

    11,841
    4,801
    113
    I can imagine M3 drivers coming up behind the car and nearly having an accident through a fit of giggles at what they would see as ordinary A4 made out to be a S4. Until it shoots off into the distance that is.
    There is going to be a hell of a market for replacement rear boxes with quad exhausts...
     
    X3man likes this.
  40. X3man

    X3man Well known member Gold Supporter X3 M40i Carbon Black

    5,609
    6,972
    113
    Shocking lack of attention to detail or making the blanked off ones less obvious or at least the same size and shape
     
    Simonwhite2000 and cuke2u like this.
  41. pagenotfound

    pagenotfound Active Member Team Moonlight TFSI Owners Group Audi A4 Audi Avant Owner Group quattro S-line owners group

    229
    140
    43
    I imagine you'd be more likely to find hen's teeth in rocking horse droppings than seeing an M3 sizing up against one of these abominations in the wild. Hopefully it will be a short lived experiment.
     
    Simonwhite2000 likes this.
  42. cuke2u

    cuke2u Well-Known Member TFSI Owners Group saloon Audi A4 S-line owners group

    11,841
    4,801
    113
    Then substitute whatever car you like, twas only a example :icon thumright:
     
  43. pagenotfound

    pagenotfound Active Member Team Moonlight TFSI Owners Group Audi A4 Audi Avant Owner Group quattro S-line owners group

    229
    140
    43
    Maybe too subtle. I was inferring that the diesel S4 was unlikely to be seen in numbers as I really don't get who would be buying them. If driving a big engined, powerful diesel is your thing - get an HGV licence.
     
    cuke2u likes this.

Share This Page