2000 hr photoshop

johnnywb

Registered User
OMG. He definately needs to get out more. How comes i can't even do something basic in photoshop!?
 
I

imported_VaulterTim

Guest
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gif

That is absolutely awesome!
 

The Slug

Registered User
very good, tho the train one looks a lil flat, also looks like a smilie dropped in on the trians lamp, lol..impressive stuff allround, like u say needs to get out a bit more.;)
 

necroeire

Registered User
What a waste of time. Hours if not days of that poor guys life wasted for what?

It's easier to take a photo!
 

fallmonk

Turbo Sport
[ QUOTE ]
What a waste of time. Hours if not days of that poor guys life wasted for what?

It's easier to take a photo!

[/ QUOTE ]

Handy if u wana frame someone for murder !

have you never watched "JFK"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gif
 

AndyMac

Active Member
That's one helluva wind up, Turner Prize anybody? Kings new clothes etc etc.
It took me close to 4,000 hours to build an exact replica of a 1997 Audi A4 2.8 Quattro, so good in fact it is completely indistinguishable from an original.
Photoshop my ****!
 

johnnywb

Registered User
Lol, his bio makes interesting reading. It seems essentially he's an artist, but instead of using paint, he uses photoshop. Well, at least it saves on mess!
 

AndyMac

Active Member
Ummm yes we're all "artistes" of one sort or another.
I'm sorry but the point of being artistic is that you actually create something unique using your interpretation of the subject matter.
All he's done is create something that already exists and could be recreated by anyone in 1/16th of a second not 2000 hours. Probably the poorest application of digital technology I've yet to see (and that's up against some pretty stiff competition).
 

beaker

Registered User
Its really not that impressive. It looks like a poor architectural rendering, though done photoshop instead of 3D. The composition is pretty poor as well, your eye gets thrown off the top right of the image, and there's a real lack of depth in it, really needs some depth of field and fogging. Yadda yadda, anyway, don't like it.
 

AndyMac

Active Member
I think whether it's any good or not is totally irrelevant. People will applaud the time it's taken to do rather than the end result. Pathetic.
 

AndyMac

Active Member
Normally you'd bother to reproduce something that can be appreciated, a reproduction of a photo is just a waste of time. There are slightly more efficient ways of capturing such things.
 

jdp1962

Grumpy Old Man
[ QUOTE ]
Normally you'd bother to reproduce something that can be appreciated, a reproduction of a photo is just a waste of time. There are slightly more efficient ways of capturing such things.

[/ QUOTE ]

Like, presumably, taking the picture in the first place? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/noidea.gif
 
Top