Avant 1.4

RetroFishTwin

Registered User
Joined
Jan 11, 2019
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
UK
Hi All,

I'm looking to get my first Audi and wondered has anyone had any experience with the ' 16 Avant 1.4 TFSI (150) Sport?

There doesn't seem to be a lot of info on them in comparison to the other engine sizes and wondering if a 1.4 engine is worth looking into for a estate style body?

Any info would be greatly appreciated!

RTF
 
This is the car I have, so yes. Engine surprisingly good and feels adequate. Fuel consumption is 37 - 45 mpg depending on the mix of driving etc. Long motorway runs good for 50 ish.
 
So I have a 67 plate 1.4 TFSi S-Line Avant manual.
Is it adequate? Yes.
Would I buy another B9 Avant? Absolutely.
Would I buy another 1.4 TFSi B9 Avant? Absolutely not.

I came from a 15 plate 1.4 {125) A3 S-Line, which in terms of responsiveness and driveability was head and shoulders above the A4.

The A3 was pretty much happy from 2mph to about 25 mph. A4 is unhappy below about 7-8 mph and above 20mph in 2nd - makes a big difference in stop start London traffic.

Get stuck in traffic on the motorway and drop towards 60mph, you're going to need to drop to 5th and possibly 4th to have accessible power to pull out into the outside lane - again very different from the A3.

Apart from this, it cruises perfectly well, and is very well mannered. 12 months, 5k miles, long term consumption for me is 36mpg. I'd say 2.5k of 3-7 mile inner city stop start journeys and 2.5k of motorway. I tend to sit on the motorway at 75-77mph, and usually get 42mpg at that.

It's a lovely car, and I'm not even convinced it's underpowered, I just don't think the gearing is right.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk
 
psychoscot has a point about the gearing. First is tiny and a bit frustrating. Though I have got used to it. I would disagree about 2nd. Once the engine is warm, it’s more than up to the task. And (as I’ve noted before) there’s some fun to be had at the top end (when taking into account the engine size and size of car). I can’t see how anyone could complain about 3-6th. They are well set up for a mix of power and efficiency.

In general, the engine is more than enough for urban, suburban and intercity driving. Especially when you learn how to get the best from it.

I have to say, if I still lived in central London, personally, I’d never have considered a manual in the first place. It’s kind of self evident that an automatic is going to make your life easier. Each to their own...

I do still live in a city but it’s nothing like central London and so have plenty of opportunity to get away from stop start traffic. It means changing gears isn’t onerous (I like having a manual). And I’ve got an average of 43mpg since taking ownership (3,500 miles). Which I think is excellent for a car as large and as solidly built as the A4.

Really, I t comes down to finances. I paid around £15k for a 16 avant with 9 months of warranty. I was always going to get a petrol engine and always going to get an estate. Similar priced cars were golf estates, Leon estates and for focus estates. For me, the A4 was head and shoulders above them all of them. I regret nothing about the purchase.

Would a larger engine be nice? Yes.

Do I mind the engine size? Not at all.

Would I recommend the 1.4 A4 in the £15k budget range? Without a shadow of a doubt.

But if you don’t like changing gears, get an automatic. Innit.
 
psychoscot has a point about the gearing. First is tiny and a bit frustrating. Though I have got used to it. I would disagree about 2nd. Once the engine is warm, it’s more than up to the task. And (as I’ve noted before) there’s some fun to be had at the top end (when taking into account the engine size and size of car). I can’t see how anyone could complain about 3-6th. They are well set up for a mix of power and efficiency.

In general, the engine is more than enough for urban, suburban and intercity driving. Especially when you learn how to get the best from it.

I have to say, if I still lived in central London, personally, I’d never have considered a manual in the first place. It’s kind of self evident that an automatic is going to make your life easier. Each to their own...

I do still live in a city but it’s nothing like central London and so have plenty of opportunity to get away from stop start traffic. It means changing gears isn’t onerous (I like having a manual). And I’ve got an average of 43mpg since taking ownership (3,500 miles). Which I think is excellent for a car as large and as solidly built as the A4.

Really, I t comes down to finances. I paid around £15k for a 16 avant with 9 months of warranty. I was always going to get a petrol engine and always going to get an estate. Similar priced cars were golf estates, Leon estates and for focus estates. For me, the A4 was head and shoulders above them all of them. I regret nothing about the purchase.

Would a larger engine be nice? Yes.

Do I mind the engine size? Not at all.

Would I recommend the 1.4 A4 in the £15k budget range? Without a shadow of a doubt.

But if you don’t like changing gears, get an automatic. Innit.
Couldn't agree more on the auto box comments - however my other half passed her test 6 weeks before I ordered the A4, and we decided it was better for her to get a couple of years experience driving a manual box (for when we end up hiring cars abroad etc)... I guess I'm directly comparing two cars which have a considerable weight difference, so the difference in responsiveness/driveability shouldn't be surprising - I stand by my statement that "I" wouldn't buy it again - each to their own though!

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk
 
Each to their own for sure. Everyone’s needs are different. And we all have to make compromises. Or we’d all be driving RS4s.

The good thing, with (I’m guessing) £15k to play with, OP has a world of choice avaialable to them.

Perhaps the real question is to know what they are looking for from their new car. That way we’d be able to help them better.
 
I bought a ' 16 Avant 1.4 TFSI (150) Sport last month and I love it. My previous car was a Seat Exeo ST 2.0 diesel 143 bhp, which was simply a rebadged A4 B7 Avant.

I was worried about fuel consumption. I needn't have been. On a particular journey where the Exeo would manage 50mpg, the A4 does 45mpg. Taking into account the current price difference between diesel and unleaded, I would say the the actual journey cost is the same.

Performance is marginally quicker, as you would expect from a lighter car with a few more bhp. There is a noticeable difference depending on whether you select "comfort" or "dynamic" driving mode. In comfort mode you want to drive sedately but in dynamic mode it feels like a sports car, the throttle response being much sharper. 0-60 in under 9 seconds is adequate for me.

Cabin noise is very well suppressed and feels relaxing compared to my old diesel.