Thank you Jungle for taking the time to explain your experience and thoughts on comparing different tune boxed cars and the takeaway from rolling road results. I think moral of the story for me is obsessing over figures and comparing different cars dyno results as a measure of comparison of a cars true performance will usually end in disappointment, confusion and/or frustration. Prior to a few days ago I didn't really know much about dynos and this experience has certainly proven to give me a better understanding as to what dynos can and cannot be used for and whilst they are tool for comparison on the same car same day for tuning purposes beyond that results rarely provide an accurate depiction of how different cars perform in the real world. Just by chance was also scrolling through some older threads on here comparing Revo stage 1 cars to APR stage 1 and despite the Revo consistently producing lower bhp/torque numbers on the same Dyno and same day that Revo car in particular was said to drive better and was actually faster than the APR in real world .
That said I don't blame myself for wanting to somehow quantify the increase in power the MTM provides. As we all know it's one of the more pricey box options on the market albeit turns out I went about quantifying in not the ideal way. If I do take the car on another Dyno, which at the moment is looking unlikely, I will only use to compare stock against the box . Most likely I am going to invest in a vboxt sport/performance to see how the car is actually performing.
That said I don't blame myself for wanting to somehow quantify the increase in power the MTM provides. As we all know it's one of the more pricey box options on the market albeit turns out I went about quantifying in not the ideal way. If I do take the car on another Dyno, which at the moment is looking unlikely, I will only use to compare stock against the box . Most likely I am going to invest in a vboxt sport/performance to see how the car is actually performing.
