the thing you have to remember with any mod like that is the manufacturer spent millions over the years developing a package that works and the idea that you can chop a bit off and it will be better is not really realistic..
wrong,they work to a budget and regulations,you CAN always better what they have done.
you do need the backpressure though unless its mapped to suit you wont see much if any gains,on some turbo cars the ecu actually starts to pull timing and runs rich so you actually loose power unless you have the map tweaked to suit the extra flow
The 3.2 lump has developed from the 2.8 8 valve into a 3.2 16 valve
A/ So what are you going to chop off that Audi didnt thats going to make your 3.2 quicker ??
B/ So how are you going to map an engine to suit the lack of back pressure ?? If you can do that then sell the idea to the companies that spend a fortune developing exhausts on flow rigs...to produce back pressures when all they needed was a remap.........
No cat where one was factory-fitted = fail from Jan 1st 2012!
http://www.dft.gov.uk/vosa/repository/MOT Inspection Manual.pdf
Apologies for hijacking the thread, but I guess it wouldn't be worth doing a decat on my 140 TDi then?