When we Spoke to MRC they just seemed reluctant, not that they wouldn't take your money and do the work. We discussed the issues with going dual pulley being increased heat due to higher boost requiring heat management/cooler upgrade and ideally decat also the smaller charger pulley is apparently prone to belt slip due to the increase in torque and the pulley's smaller surface area, thus less frictional area to hold the belt.
Yes, that's what I was alluding to. As you agree, MRC is a great company and they only want to do work that they can "approve" of. Good on them for that.
The car we had was tuned around 85k and the cat gave up at 90k, now I'm not saying it was related as the cat May of been nearing the end of its life anyway but the additional heat generated from tuning most certainally didn't help. Usually cats start to break up and start to pass through the exhaust system this can be seen sometimes at nighttime under load however in this case the result was extreme, unusual and catastrophic in blocking the exhaust on one bank.
Not the answer I was hoping for
Whilst it is "likely" that the cat has aged, it is also "possible" that it was fine and got killed by the tune. Well
@arad85 is kindly using his cats as test subjects now
I am a fan of MRC's work and bang for buck I've found their stage 2 package to be very good. I just think that it seems to go further that this then u need all of the next level mods or nothing to make it worthwhile and then for the cost involved the gains are very minimal.
I totally agree. As my wife would say "more money than sense". I call it getting the best I can if I can afford it
(And I did get a big discount when I bought my car)
475 is awesome
@Dippy. Which fuel do you use?
I think apart from one or two tanks of 95 at the start of ownership I have always used mostly Shell Nitro with the occasional tank of Momentum. I always assumed that the stock S5 ECU does
not advance timing to take advantage of anything higher than 95 RON, but I didn't care and always paid for the best fuel. However I discussed this with Doug and he wasn't sure that it was true. I never compared performance between fuels so I can't say.
Anyway, I filled up with Momentum before getting to MRC (because there is that Tesco nearby) and told Doug that I mostly use Shell Nitro because I have to go out of my way to get to Tesco stations where I live. He said that aside from bad batches, Nitro and Momentum are much the same octane. So my car has been optimised for 99 RON and I will continue to use Nitro, but when I get the choice, Momentum instead.
Today, they have fitted the ultracharger. Let's see if they can tune with it on the CREC based engine - I've been told it's a totally different tune on the newer EU engines.
I couldn't find any info about the OEM TB, but APR has already stated that the engine probably won't run if the UC is fitted without a remap. That suggests that the motor and position sensor signals in their UC TB are sufficiently different from the OEM that ECU settings need to be changed. So undoubtedly their challenge is only to find where the setting are in the SIMOS 16 since it is different from the SIMOS 8.4/5. I would be shocked if this is anything more than a minor challenge.