1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

would you have?

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by Turkster, Jan 9, 2012.

  1. Turkster

    Turkster Bro.Paul 2.5TDI Quattro Sport

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,794
    Likes Received:
    47
    Would you have an screen mounted camera recording your driving for the insurance company if it made your premium go down?

    or

    would you have one for your own protection from the crash 4 cash scammers on the roads?

    your views please folks,
     
  2. Advert Guest Advertisement


  3. ScottD3

    ScottD3 I want your faulty electronics
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2010
    Messages:
    15,243
    Likes Received:
    1,101
    Not sure.
    I guess it depends on a number of factors for me.
    How visibly is it? - I would not want some massive camera or recording taking up space on my dash, glove box or boot.
    How much will it cost? - Is it a one off cost for the equipment, then another cost fitting and I wonder what would happen if I swap cars.
    How will it be wired in to my car? - I don't want some YTS ripping my car apart to wiring it in.
    How much will it save me on my insurance? - if the cost is more than I'd say or about the same, then I can't see much point.
    How much information will it take and store for how long? - film my trip but not my location, conversations or driving habits.

    Is it something like one of them driving boxes that learners are being offered?
     
  4. Sarah's A3

    Sarah's A3 MODERATOR V6 S3 Hybrid
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2010
    Messages:
    5,920
    Likes Received:
    29
    flip nooooo way. I'd have to slow down a tad!
     
  5. quattrojames

    quattrojames Moderator
    Staff Member Moderator Audi A6 Audi Avant Owner Group

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    Messages:
    14,043
    Likes Received:
    561
    Not for me.

    I can visualise having a no-fault collision, and the insurance company trawling back through the last x hours of footage and refusing to pay because you've been observed at 31mph in a 30mph limit.
     
  6. jojo

    jojo Looking for Boost!
    Staff Member Moderator Team Daytona quattro Audi A6 Audi Avant Owner Group Audi S3

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2003
    Messages:
    28,481
    Likes Received:
    3,234
    I share the same views of the above really, I wouldn't really wanting anyone knowing how I drive or where I am even, so things are fine the way it is now.
     
  7. jdp1962

    jdp1962 Grumpy Old Moderator
    Staff Member Moderator TFSI Owners Group Gold Supporter Team V6 Team Tornado quattro Black Edition s tronic Audi S4

    Joined:
    May 26, 2003
    Messages:
    7,824
    Likes Received:
    2,222
    Well it's one way to stop people picking their noses.
     
  8. jcs356

    jcs356 Brum brum

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,713
    Likes Received:
    56
    I can see the point - there are so many people trying scams atm that having some proper footage of what happened could be useful. Then again, as folks have said, bet it could be manipulated against you.

    I've been toying with the idea of a helmet cam whilst out cycling, again for my own protection.
     
  9. sportstractor

    sportstractor Chugger

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2009
    Messages:
    2,713
    Likes Received:
    33
    Hmm iv not heard of that before. My friend wanted to have the 'insure-a-box' type thing fitted, which tracks you, and measures yours acceleration, braking and cornering... And they reward you for sensible driving... I didn't like the idea of that, a camera is way too much!

    Off topic slightly, but insurance should be government run and added to the cost of fuel, that way we won't be paying for all the drivers out there who don't insure or tax there vehicles, and very few people would be able to get around it, as everybody need fuel (unless you make your own)
     
    Keeno likes this.
  10. JtotheD

    JtotheD Active Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2011
    Messages:
    907
    Likes Received:
    26
    no. nuff said.
     
  11. fingermouse

    fingermouse thats me

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    3,901
    Likes Received:
    84
    I didn`t buy my car to go slow. God if they watched my average route id probally be banned
     
  12. audiv8quattro

    audiv8quattro Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    448
    Likes Received:
    9
    Depending on how big camera was because if it's to big then after going through all the insurance details and waiting for ages for them to say they aren't gonna pay out because there was a massive camera obstructing the view through the windscreen would be a p**s take a bit
     
  13. willowsdad

    willowsdad Sideways

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,027
    Likes Received:
    32
    Not for me thanks. As people have said above sometimes my right foot gets ticklish. Or maybe I like to show the corsa with the big exhaust what a real car can do. Wouldn't want anyone seeing that!
     
  14. hades-

    hades- Yorkshire & Humber Rep.
    Regional Rep VCDS Map User

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,494
    Likes Received:
    645
    there realy small on the mirror inside
    id never have 1
    if the cops say it they could look at the footage accident or not id be ****ed
     
  15. Turkster

    Turkster Bro.Paul 2.5TDI Quattro Sport

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,794
    Likes Received:
    47
    the ones that are on the market place that the insurance companies are looking at are screen mounted sucker type fitting that can be taken from car to car, thay take up less room than a Tom Tom and only record upto 30 mins and them re-write over that recording, from my understanding its in combat to the "Crash 4 Cash" drivers out there and not about how fast or slow we drive,

    The reason why i asked this as im in talks with a major insurance company who are looking to buy these types of cameras and offer them for free to there customers in return for lower premiums, its been made very clear that the "crash 4 cash" set ups are on the rise at such a rate as its classed as easy money and when the scammers are putting a "No Claims Protection" on there deals and then having many crashies with multi cars involvced and taking the blame on the roadside and getting £1000 per person per car you can start to see that whacking one car into the back of 2 cars can earn a man £10k for a days work!

    This cost is handed down to you and I !

    Now what is your views ?
     
  16. ScottD3

    ScottD3 I want your faulty electronics
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2010
    Messages:
    15,243
    Likes Received:
    1,101
    Crash 4 Crash?

    You hit someone and they hit you and share the money?

    Be interesting to see how much it lowers the insurance and what they are really like.
    Links to products or images?
     
  17. Turkster

    Turkster Bro.Paul 2.5TDI Quattro Sport

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,794
    Likes Received:
    47
  18. hades-

    hades- Yorkshire & Humber Rep.
    Regional Rep VCDS Map User

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,494
    Likes Received:
    645
    my view stays i wouldnt have 1 fitted even if they paid me to
    i wouldnt risk geting pulled over and the police view the footage
    anyway most crash for cash happend from the rear wouldnt help you at all
     
  19. Turkster

    Turkster Bro.Paul 2.5TDI Quattro Sport

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,794
    Likes Received:
    47
    The "Crash 4 Cash" scam is when YOU are forced to hit someone up the rear mate and causing your insurance to go up!
     
  20. hades-

    hades- Yorkshire & Humber Rep.
    Regional Rep VCDS Map User

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,494
    Likes Received:
    645
    still wouldnt like i said the police can view the footage and **** the driver over
    i use gopro on bikes and track
    iv been asked to hane it over a few times
    thats why id never use a cam ever again unless on the track
     
  21. L33h

    L33h Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2011
    Messages:
    215
    Likes Received:
    7
    I fit windscreens for a big haulage company around my area. They have the cameras fitter to them.

    They work on a impact sensor. So if the driver is forced to slam the brakes on, swerve or hit something then it starts recording.

    I think its a good idea for waggons and busses etc. But not for me in the car. There's also cameras that record mileage to prove that your not driving over the mileage stated on your insurace, to bump the premiums down a bit.
     
  22. Advert Guest Advertisement



    to hide this advert.
  23. hades-

    hades- Yorkshire & Humber Rep.
    Regional Rep VCDS Map User

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,494
    Likes Received:
    645
    yeah most new hgv use them and also they watch you aswell as the road to prove you wasnt useing phones etc or falling asleep
     
  24. Turkster

    Turkster Bro.Paul 2.5TDI Quattro Sport

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,794
    Likes Received:
    47
    well watch this space folks as this "IS" what the insurance companies are pushing for, its not going to be some some time yet as they are so tight on how much they are willing to pay for the said units that nobody will sell them to them for a 0.5p profit per unit, these units can be made and sold for £3 each and yet they are still crying at that!
     
  25. quattrojames

    quattrojames Moderator
    Staff Member Moderator Audi A6 Audi Avant Owner Group

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    Messages:
    14,043
    Likes Received:
    561
    Until they become mandatory I wouldn't fit one.

    If they gain public acceptance and premiums drop then hopefully we'll all benefit whether we have one or not.
     
  26. dannyboy75

    dannyboy75 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2011
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    5
    Surely a box that tracks your location, recording and measuring your speed/acceleration etc. is far more instrusive than a camera that simply looks out through the windscreen??
     
  27. ScottD3

    ScottD3 I want your faulty electronics
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2010
    Messages:
    15,243
    Likes Received:
    1,101
    If its just a camera, no mic, tracking of any sort and it lowered my insurance and I could fit with out it being to distracting.
    I'd have one.
    Can't see what harm a camera could do.

    Get one of them Micro DV cameras and build it in to the rear view mirror.
     
  28. S4 Muzza

    S4 Muzza oww! my giant blue head!

    Joined:
    May 6, 2011
    Messages:
    344
    Likes Received:
    26
    i've considered putting a camera on my dash, and i do think its a good idea. if you're in a crash thats not your fault, and the other motorist says otherwise, you provide your insurance with the relevant clip and nothing more. if the footage is unfavourable in any way, you simply neglect the fact you have a dash cam and your back where you would have been anyway. obviously if you then go posting footage of yourself driving like a fud on youtube you're just asking for trouble.

    i dont think it should be mandatory, but i dont see how having one voluntarily can be bad in any way. i've been looking to invest in a Go-Pro HD for some time now, this is just the excuse i need! :whistle2:
     

Share This Page