1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  1. ELIASGK74

    ELIASGK74 Member

    47
    0
    6
    one good photo from my s3! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif
    [​IMG]
     
  2. scoTTy

    scoTTy Active Member

    1,962
    11
    38
    Been there in my TT but I certainly wasn't taking photos!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gif
     
  3. ajmackie

    ajmackie Member

    922
    0
    16
    How do you take a photo whilst driving at that speed?!
     
  4. Drill

    Drill Member

    928
    0
    16
    Dude, at THAT speed, you're about to run outta gas /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif

    /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beerchug.gif
     
  5. excursion

    excursion Member

    740
    0
    16
    170 MPH? I didn't know they had the torque to pull that. What setup are you running.

    PS I am right aren't I 272km/h then devide by 1.6 to get 170mph?
     
  6. s8n

    s8n Member

    207
    0
    16
    HOLY SMOKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  7. jetspeed

    jetspeed New Member

    27
    0
    1
    mother of god /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked2.gif
     
  8. Woodster

    Woodster Welcome to my world...

    84
    0
    6
    You can actually see the petrol gauge going down!!

    /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/goofy.gif
     
  9. MarkS3

    MarkS3 Member

    83
    0
    6
    just looked at the profile no mod's listed!!!!
     
  10. Woodster

    Woodster Welcome to my world...

    84
    0
    6
    must be a long steep hill... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
     
  11. recomdos

    recomdos Active Member

    1,000
    4
    38
    [ QUOTE ]
    Woody_S3 said:
    must be a long steep hill... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

    [/ QUOTE ]

    ........or good photoshop work /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif lol
     
  12. Gambba

    Gambba Active Member

    1,361
    2
    36
    [ QUOTE ]
    excursion said:
    170 MPH? I didn't know they had the torque to pull that. What setup are you running.

    PS I am right aren't I 272km/h then devide by 1.6 to get 170mph?

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Well 169 to be correct. But a more accurate readout of that speed would be on the CC, but i found at that ort of speed looking at the CC was probably as stupid as taking a photo /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/lol.gif Think my speedo was between 5 and 10 km/h out at speeds of 255 km/h (So speedo actually read over 260)....which is not too bad.

    I would say that that has to be down hill, to get that reading on the speedo, and one hell of a stretch of open road.

     
  13. RichA3Turbo

    RichA3Turbo ...Watching you! Staff Member Moderator

    5,089
    5
    38
    Even the CC is only as accurate the accuracy of other cvariables on the car i.e tires .etc.

    The law is +10%, -0% for the limits. Most read high.
    Most accurate for the average person is to use road angel or something like that!

    Rich
     
  14. Grant

    Grant Well-Known Member VCDS Map User Audi RS3

    1,206
    118
    63
    Regardless of the speedo reading, it's still bloody quick!

    140mph on my car works out at 133mph on my Road Angel which is +5%.
     
  15. Gambba

    Gambba Active Member

    1,361
    2
    36
    [ QUOTE ]
    Imola S3 said:
    Regardless of the speedo reading, it's still bloody quick!

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Quick is never quick enough though /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/lol.gif

    As strange as this may seem but when reading my speedo in km/h it just doesn't seem as fast as if it was in mph...how's that for a psychological block! Even when I'm cruising at 200 km/h I don't think [censored] I'm going far to fast, but if it was 120mph on the speedo I would.... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif
     
  16. cybrey

    cybrey Member

    331
    0
    16
    I'm the other way around Gambba.. I think its just what your not used to ( If you follow what I mean).
     
  17. cyuen

    cyuen Member

    200
    0
    16
    what have u done to ur car?? big turbo?
     
  18. Gambba

    Gambba Active Member

    1,361
    2
    36
    [ QUOTE ]
    cybrey said:
    I'm the other way around Gambba.. I think its just what your not used to ( If you follow what I mean).

    [/ QUOTE ]

    That's it, but it's kinda strange as most of the countries I use cars in are in km/h and only in the states and the UK do I use mph.....
     
  19. ELIASGK74

    ELIASGK74 Member

    47
    0
    6
    my best is 278km/h because the car dont let you go on.
    its not a photoshop job!it is for sure a down hill but the photo was taken from my nokia 6600 with my wife in car ,with klima on and many bags.also i have just results for my car :
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  20. Grant

    Grant Well-Known Member VCDS Map User Audi RS3

    1,206
    118
    63
    1.71 bar /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked2.gif

    What mods have you done to achieve almost 285bhp?
     
  21. cyuen

    cyuen Member

    200
    0
    16
    holy **** 465nm
    i want to know what you got too!!!
     
  22. ELIASGK74

    ELIASGK74 Member

    47
    0
    6
    remap,air filter,samco intake pipe,dv!
     
  23. cyuen

    cyuen Member

    200
    0
    16
    what remap r u using??
     
  24. cyuen

    cyuen Member

    200
    0
    16
    this thing gotta have the most torque for the less mods!!!! i like it like this!
     
  25. ELIASGK74

    ELIASGK74 Member

    47
    0
    6
    powerlogic remap in greece!
     
  26. Gambba

    Gambba Active Member

    1,361
    2
    36
    The plots are all fecked up as far as I'm concerned, as it appears that you have no usable torque. Your tourque curve should bear no relation to the hp on a good remap and should definately not spike like that.

    460Nm is a disproportionate amount of torque for an S3 with only 280hp......it just isn't right and is proven in the RR plots. Just take a look at some of the plots in the rolling road graphs section to see what I mean.

    1.71 bar is very high and the peak torque is way off where it should be in my opinion and peaks and tails off far too quickly to make it usable.
     
  27. RichA3Turbo

    RichA3Turbo ...Watching you! Staff Member Moderator

    5,089
    5
    38
    To be honest, i cant see a K04 getting 350lb.ft

    Rich
     

Share This Page