S3_Bon said:just been sat reading all this, what a mess i feel for you man, i've just turned 21 and bought an s3 and know how much it all costs to buy and insure etc!! is there anymore news on this yet? best wishes and good luck!!!!
ash_s3 said:also been in contact with the bloke i bought it off, told him im going to sue, he said he will see his solicitor and get back to me - which he hasnt!
going to phone him later tonight.
offered him an out of court settlement (amount we both agree on probably around the £5k mark) or i said il take him to court for the whole £9k then he will have to pay both sides of solicitor fees + court fees etc.. would be well over £11K - this is what my solicitor suggested but i just want it over as quick as possible and im a decent chap so thought id offer him the chance to pay a bit less
ash
Mike H said:As far as buying a car goes. Being an innocent purchaser is about as grim as it can get.
As for sueing the last owner.... the burden of proof lies with you to prove he sold the car to you knowing it was ringed.
Proving that could be tough in court. But all the very best of luck.
Mike H said:AFAIK stolen recovered with no damage is category X.
So you shouldn't actually lose any value in my opinion as long as you can show it wasn't actually damaged.
Mike H said:Complain to the insurance ombudsman. If you have it in writing that they have offered it you....you have a case. the ombudsman will review your case.
ash_s3 said:nothing in writing mate, all done over the phone, got copy of the letter i sent allong with the cheque
whos the ombudsman??
IDUA3 said:First off,im really gutted for you mate!!
Anyway the insurance company will have recorded all conversations, they do all to cover themselves and be able to proove what they have cinfimed,or not confirmed to a customer. Most insurance policies are entered into over the telephone so this is must for them! The ombudsman, if they decide to investigate, will be able to obtain the recording of your conversation. If in that they have agreed a settlement with you, then it will act as a verbal contract and will be seen as binding by the ombudsman. Now unless they can then broker a deal with the salvage company it may end up they still have to sell the car to the salvage company to keep to that contract,however they will have to pay you for the value of the car, at least, if not compensation aswell.
Good luck pal!
IDUA3 said:First off,im really gutted for you mate!!
Anyway the insurance company will have recorded all conversations, they do all to cover themselves and be able to proove what they have cinfimed,or not confirmed to a customer. Most insurance policies are entered into over the telephone so this is must for them! The ombudsman, if they decide to investigate, will be able to obtain the recording of your conversation. If in that they have agreed a settlement with you, then it will act as a verbal contract and will be seen as binding by the ombudsman. Now unless they can then broker a deal with the salvage company it may end up they still have to sell the car to the salvage company to keep to that contract,however they will have to pay you for the value of the car, at least, if not compensation aswell.
Good luck pal!
Mike H said:Erm....
Ok whilst they may have to pay some form of compensation.... why on earth would they have to pay Ash the value of the car? Technically it's theirs? The argument lies on who gets first dabs on it.
.
ash_s3 said:Can you explain a bit on this mate, sounds like you know what your on about and could do with some good solid advice
i thought once the cheque was cashed the car was mine, simple as. but they say they made a mistake and it wasnt theirs to sell in the 1st place.
they say i cant have my bits back but surely taking them without consent is theft??
Mike H said:Erm....
I work for R&SA as a tech handler, and can honestly say that the ombudsman is something well worth while going too if you have an honest grievance. Insurers have to make recordings of calls, place notes on files, and if they have agreed stuff with you, it'll be on the file, trust me.
IDUA3 said:Erm ............
Technically it isn't if they have brokered a deal for the purchase of it, accepted payment via cheque, then cashed it. The transaction is complete. If they then go back on it, they have to refund the money paid, (the value of the car), and compensation. I though what I said was pretty clear.
ash_s3 said:Guy at directline said he wants photocopies of all my receipts and to send them to him direct, he said theyre not letting anyone have access to the car until the case is resolved and all parties are happy which is good. He seemed pretty helpful and said hes been over and over the case to try and find a way around it but he cant see a way.