1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

s3 or tt ?

Discussion in 'A3/S3/Sportback (8P Chassis)' started by audi_driver, Sep 11, 2007.

  1. audi_driver

    audi_driver S LINE

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just wondering what you guys would choose between an s3 or a tt? I have an 8p a3 sline and told my gf that if i get a new car itll have to be the s3 which she replied " it just looks the same as ur car" what do you guys think? The tt is still too feminine for my liking
     
  2. Advert Guest Advertisement


  3. Staz

    Staz is a retronaut
    Staff Member Moderator VCDS Map User

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,219
    Likes Received:
    64
    I've been through the same brain thoughts myself. I test drove both cars on the same day the the S3 made me feel way happier.

    The TT interior and exterior is gorgeous (although I'm not keen on the lights) and there's a white one on the Sixt forecourt I see nearly everyday and drool over. But it is a bit of a girls car. Not too practical. And more expensive. Even with the 2.0 (losing the quattro of course) and the sports suspension only, not magnetic ride, and the same options as the S3, the TT was about £500 more. And to get closer performance by taking the 3.2 (yet still slower) costs another 5k.

    For me I simply don't like it THAT much. I felt way cooler in the S3 too because it's a special car and far rarer.
     
  4. Boydie

    Boydie Guest

    S3 in ibis white with all the toys - makes sense!

    A much better deal than the TT, more room, more fun, bigger boot, more tuning portential for the money!

    A tt is a bit of a hairdressers car in my opinion - dont get me wrong though i do like them but i will never own one
     
  5. mfspen

    mfspen Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    577
    Likes Received:
    10
    Did the options really make that much difference ?

    According to the Audi UK site, the base OTR price of the TT is £24.9k and the S3 is £26.8k.
     
  6. Shao_khan

    Shao_khan Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    0
    The TT in base spec and S3 are a bit different tho - TT has no Xeonons, leather etc as standard.

    I have no doubt we will see a 2l Quatro TT sometime soon, and when you are able to compare like for like performance wise it will come down to nothing more than body style.

    I went S3 because it has more room for the kids, the TT was just a bit tight for them.

    I think the TT will have better residuals (Coupe) marginally, but the TTr is already not looking so hot - with 6 month old TTr's below list.
     
  7. Staz

    Staz is a retronaut
    Staff Member Moderator VCDS Map User

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,219
    Likes Received:
    64
    Yeah the S3 has quite few standard bits like xenons and heated seats. I just put in all the extras that are standard and that I want and it was 300 quid more. And only FWD and 200bhp. No thanks!
     
  8. Covenant

    Covenant Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    246
    Likes Received:
    0
    TT with magnetic ride for me next time - I might be getting old, but S3 and Sline suspension is annoyingly hard unless you go for aftermarket kits.
     
  9. mfspen

    mfspen Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    577
    Likes Received:
    10
    I agree. The Sportback version is markedly more comfortable though.

    I prefer the looks of the tiTTy, but practicality would rule it out for me. Actually, I probably won't go for the 2.0T next time either, as I'm sure that gas guzzlers are going to be increasingly targetted by 'green' taxes in future. The new VED bands are just the thin end of the wedge IMO.
     
  10. mitch78

    mitch78 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    2,349
    Likes Received:
    4
    :thumbsup:
     
  11. Spin140

    Spin140 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,196
    Likes Received:
    186
    I had the same dilema and love the TT - 2 things swayed it for me the first being TT availability followed by very limited space - I rarely carry passengers but would like the option.
     
  12. JohnS3

    JohnS3 Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    2
    I have to agree with Boydie, the S3 is far more practical, try and get two suitcases in a TT!!
     
  13. JohnS3

    JohnS3 Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    2
    Have you driven one? I"m told it's a bone shaker (IE track option) when it's switched on.
     
  14. Covenant

    Covenant Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    246
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's the point - I need to drive to test obviously, but one setting for comfort and one for caning it :racer: seems like the best of both worlds to me.
     
  15. Staz

    Staz is a retronaut
    Staff Member Moderator VCDS Map User

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,219
    Likes Received:
    64
    There's a good review of it in this months Evo Fast Fleet. Highly rated!
     
  16. JamS3

    JamS3 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,257
    Likes Received:
    18
    Most women are the same, they cant tell the difference between a performance model to a normal one, mine is until i pointed out the differences and it was "oh yeh it does look totally different!"
     
  17. Spook

    Spook Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    1
    Just wait for the TT-S.

    I am.
     
  18. Shao_khan

    Shao_khan Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think Technically Sir you couldnt wait - hence the current steed ;)
     
  19. Spook

    Spook Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yeah, not a bad old donkey to tide me over, is it? :icon_thumright:
     
  20. chanlon1

    chanlon1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    8
    Thats what happened to me.....felt the S3 was alot more rewarding to drive than the TT.

    After buying the S3, a friend got a TT 3.2, I've driven that and not felt any difference to the S3
     
  21. JamS3

    JamS3 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,257
    Likes Received:
    18
    Autocar this month states a RS TT will be produced in 2009 with a turbocharged 2.5 engine from the Jetta in the US apparently its built already and awaiting the green light. To directly go against the Porsche Cayman etc its got around 350bhp.

    Also a S TT has already been given the green light with the engine from the S3!!
     
  22. Advert Guest Advertisement



    to hide this advert.
  23. JohnS3

    JohnS3 Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    2
    So Audi have the engine, but will they have the balls to put it in the A3?
     
  24. newbiecrg

    newbiecrg windsurfer

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,328
    Likes Received:
    0
    if the TT-S is going to happen it will be a very nice car to drive!!!

    Lighter than the S3, with the same engine and quattro, I think it will be a beauty...

    Pedro
     
  25. powerplay

    powerplay Grrrr

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just hope they put it in the S3 and slap an R on the front. That's what I'm holding out for, sadly seems a long way off still.
     
  26. siu00adg

    siu00adg Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    997
    Likes Received:
    0
    350bhp TT will DESTROY the Cayman, would be much closer to the 911

    I'd love to see an RS3 with that 2.5 in a couple of years, would definitley trade in the S3 for one! :) My moneys here for the taking Audi, just build the car god damn it!
     

Share This Page