1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

S3 or Mk2 Golf Gti?

Spacecowboy Jun 6, 2007

  1. Spacecowboy

    Spacecowboy Member

    357
    2
    18
    Just to shout out about the fact that my Mk2 Gti is still going strong as just passed MOT yesterday with only a number plate light a CV boot needing to be replaced. 228k miles on the clock and £45 notes later and it lives legally for another year! I love this bloody car - especially after drving it yesterday. What a hoot! Who needs Quattro, ESP, ABS...

    Anyways I do have to be serious about this - should I keep the S3 and Golf or do I sell the Golf? What you guys reckon?
     
  2. Dave_Bayern

    Dave_Bayern Slipping at 3.5Krpm

    1,913
    4
    36
    Depends, is the Golf a 3 door and a 16v?
     
  3. fingermouse

    fingermouse thats me

    3,959
    104
    63
    I own a S3 and I wouldn`t own a mk2 golf they just dont do it for me. So for me sell the golf lol.
     
  4. Dave_Bayern

    Dave_Bayern Slipping at 3.5Krpm

    1,913
    4
    36
    Just over 1000Kg and 180-190Bhp from a decent Mk2 16v they are VERY capable cars and a lot more fun to drive than their modern counterparts.
     
  5. madvw

    madvw Active Member

    2,489
    3
    38
    eh? i assume that you talking about a tuned 16V?
     
  6. buckas

    buckas Member

    749
    2
    18
    same here
     
  7. S3IZZO

    S3IZZO Guest

    0
    0
    0
    Mk2 Golf with a S3 engine tbh
     
  8. Spacecowboy

    Spacecowboy Member

    357
    2
    18
    No its the 8v 3 door. IMO much better than a 16 valver. It handles great, goes like stink and has no electrical gadgetry between me and the wheels (cept for the ECU and injection of course). The S3 is quick and handles amazingly well but its a bit tame and predictable - I know I am in a safe pair of hands when driving that car. The Golf is raw and relativley unforgiving - I like to have a fight on my hands. I really am torn. Plus, its great on petrol and means I can give the S3 a rest by alternating betwen the two. I think i just answered my own question...:icon_thumright:
     
  9. madvw

    madvw Active Member

    2,489
    3
    38
    nah, you dont want all that unreliable electrical management **** in there!!

    A turbo fitted to a nice old reliable mechanical injection factory 1.9 oettinger 16v, preferably in a synchro chassis. That'd do me.
     
  10. Dave_Bayern

    Dave_Bayern Slipping at 3.5Krpm

    1,913
    4
    36
    Yeah, they are 140Bhp standard so its as easy as easy to push 180 Bhp from them with very little work.

    Sticking 1.8T engines in the Mk2 chassis is pretty much old hat these days, the new 'in thing' is R32 engines, so a 24v VR6.

    Thats my next intended dedicated track car, if the missus decides to keep the BMW on the road anyway.
     
  11. mk1chopper

    mk1chopper Missing the S3

    1,092
    11
    36
    sell the mk2, buy a mk1 drop a 2.0 16v abf unit from the mk3 and stick it on twin webbers, lighter than the mk2, and better handling, and better looking! Then keep the S3 for your daily driver.
     
  12. Dave_Bayern

    Dave_Bayern Slipping at 3.5Krpm

    1,913
    4
    36
    +1 on the above :)
     
  13. madvw

    madvw Active Member

    2,489
    3
    38
    thats moving the goalposts!!
     
  14. simch

    simch Active Member

    2,028
    1
    38
    I have a 2l 8v rally spec motor in a 4 door 1991 mk2, 178k miles, 45 k on the motor, 150hp and its great fun to drive, g60 brakes, konis, roll bars etc, I ran it recently for a month as my only car and it just was so much of a laugh!

    Was gunna sell it but just canno bringg myslef too! Owned it 8 years!
     
  15. Dave_Bayern

    Dave_Bayern Slipping at 3.5Krpm

    1,913
    4
    36
    You should sell it........... to me :)

    Remembering that its worth nowt as its a cacky 4/5 door.
     
  16. PorkyWill

    PorkyWill Member

    140
    0
    16
    I'd say the new in thing are the PD diesel engines and the FSI engines tbh!

    I'd keep both cars as the mkII doesn't cost anything to maintain and it's not going to make you rich by selling it....just keep it ready for the sunny days and the country lanes!
     
  17. Dave_Bayern

    Dave_Bayern Slipping at 3.5Krpm

    1,913
    4
    36
    Not seen anyone putting an FSI in a Mk2 yet. Not in the UK anyway, few on Vortex.
     
  18. mk1chopper

    mk1chopper Missing the S3

    1,092
    11
    36
    I think a mk2 syncro running a 944 engine would be interesting, turbo and rear wheel drive
     
  19. jojo

    jojo Looking for Boost! Staff Member Moderator Team Daytona quattro Audi S3 Audi A6 Audi Avant Owner Group

    28,768
    3,436
    113
    I have my S3 and a Mk2 16V as a runabout... I've got to admit that as much as I enjoy the S3 on my weekends and days off, the Mk2 is more fun to drive :racer:... sure it doesn't have the power or traction, but it at least has an engine note and when you go pass 5k revs, the feeling is just better than a push in the back of S3 torque! Only downer is lack of climate control and creature comforts of the S3, so overall the S3 is a nicer car to own, but I won't be seeling the valver yet!
     
  20. ChriS3

    ChriS3 hud at ye bam

    2,239
    23
    38
    I'd rather have a Rallye :)
     
  21. Twosted

    Twosted New Member

    18
    0
    1
    Had a Mk2 16V in Monza blau with a GTi Engineering RE2000 16V motor as my daily driver until recently.
    Broke my heart to let it go after 12 years and 170,000 miles. But you have to move into the nineties sooner or later......

    Replaced it with a minty one owner 52 plate Goodwood green S3 with 13,000 miles on the clock.
    Nice, but feels like an owd fella's car after the valver on Konis.

    My advice, keep the Golf if you have the space. Pop in a 2 litre 16V, and enjoy.
     
  22. jcs356

    jcs356 Brum brum

    2,719
    62
    48
    Keep them both.
     
  23. LaSarthe&Back

    LaSarthe&Back Member

    300
    0
    16
    How and what little work is needed to push these to 180?

    [Michael_Howard]
    Is it safe
    [/Michael_Howard]

    seriously?
     
  24. madvw

    madvw Active Member

    2,489
    3
    38
    ugh, man they're horrible, what were they thinking with those front and rear wings?

    I was looking for a G60 at one point, but there were only something like 80 RHD ones ever made. Chances of finding a genuine edition one RHD G60 and not a shitty conversion is next to zero.
     
  25. Dave_Bayern

    Dave_Bayern Slipping at 3.5Krpm

    1,913
    4
    36
    Yeah, even just a 2.0L bottom end will get you very close, but loads of people are doing it, its rare to see an enthusiast owned 16v without at least 175Bhp these days.

    Check ClubGTI or VW Vortex...
     
  26. Spacecowboy

    Spacecowboy Member

    357
    2
    18
    Yep, the masses have spoken and I am keeping her. Just insurance to srt out now - any ideas? I got a quote for £150 based on 3000 miles a year. Not really enough.

    2.0l bottom end with a PB head on it makes the car go very very nicely, keeps it dead reliable and is a straight drop in job - no worries.
     
  27. Dave_Bayern

    Dave_Bayern Slipping at 3.5Krpm

    1,913
    4
    36
    Brentacre have always been VERY good for VW's and Audi's.
     
  28. Spacecowboy

    Spacecowboy Member

    357
    2
    18
    have any contact details?
     
  29. Dave_Bayern

    Dave_Bayern Slipping at 3.5Krpm

    1,913
    4
    36
    Tel: 01792 650933
     
  30. Ess_Three

    Ess_Three Active Member

    5,383
    12
    38
    I have a well tweaked Mk3 16v Anniversary and I can't bring myself to part with it..
    Apart from it being one of only 150 16v Anniversary's, it's making 190ish BHP, low ratio LSD 'box, Koni coilovers, Eibach ARBs, big brakes etc...
    It's raw, noisy, bumpy etc...but despite having just got a Fabia vRS to run about in...I just can't bring myself to get rid of the Mk3...which was always my favourite Golf shape....and the fact that I have made many one-off parts for it and spent 1000s of hours on it probably has a bearing too.
     
  31. Ess_Three

    Ess_Three Active Member

    5,383
    12
    38
    I can't understand anyone sticking that damn great V6 lump into a Mk2 if they want it to corner...

    Hell, it's bad enough in a Mk4...or Mk3...
    But all that weight, high up, in a Mk2?
    No thanks...a well set up 2.0 16v will murder it through the bends as it won't understeer like the V6 engined lump will..

    I was building a high spec VR6 12v for my Mk3...but gave up and sold the lot as I couldn't get the Mk3 to handle with the V6 lump in...you have no chance in a Mk2.
     
  32. M44 DUB

    M44 DUB Member

    166
    0
    16
    Keep them both!! An i agree 8v RULE. I so want another one as a daily driver
     
  33. Dave_Bayern

    Dave_Bayern Slipping at 3.5Krpm

    1,913
    4
    36
    Theres a large amount of people, people who use these machines on track week in, week out, who would disagree with you on that apsect.
     
  34. Ess_Three

    Ess_Three Active Member

    5,383
    12
    38
    And there are even more using tuned 16vs that consistantly lap far quicker...

    At the local hillclimbs, sprints and trackdays the 16v engined cars are WAY faster then the nose heavy V6 engined cars...Mk2 and Mk3.

    You can't get away from the extra weight carried forward of the drive line and high up...more understeer, harder to brake...and slower round a track.

    The V6 is a great engine...but the work involved in getting it to handle like a lighter 2.0 16v is hard and in some cases near impossible. They sound great...but unfortunately provide near terminal understeer compared to the smaller, lighter engined 16vs with not much less power.
     
  35. Dave_Bayern

    Dave_Bayern Slipping at 3.5Krpm

    1,913
    4
    36
    I've not taken part in any hillclimbs or sprints, but we evidentally go to different track days!!
     
  36. Ess_Three

    Ess_Three Active Member

    5,383
    12
    38
    I obviously go to ones where the tracks have corners... :p
     
  37. Dave_Bayern

    Dave_Bayern Slipping at 3.5Krpm

    1,913
    4
    36
    GVK (Gary) is one of the most frequent visitors out of the larger VW crowd and I've seen him at all major UK tracks, and he is currrently quite a bit faster in his VR6 than he was in the 16v.

    Same with another guy I know who has a VR6 Jetta, faster than when he had his 1.8 16v Jetta.

    But then I move in VW circles and probably see a lot more than you do, so see a wider range of differing VW cars/engines being used on track.
     
  38. Ess_Three

    Ess_Three Active Member

    5,383
    12
    38
    I'm surprised...I know Gary and his 16v was quick...


    The Jetta/Vento has always been a different story...stiffer shell and heavier at the back so they've always handled better in V6 form than a Golf...


    I don't wish to sound bolshy, but I doubt it...

    I've been 'into' VWs for well over 10 years..attending shows (GTI International for example) all that time, owned / modified 2 GTI Golfs, A Lupo GTI, A Corrado VR6, an Ibiza Cupra 16v and a Fabia vRS...as well as helped in many engine swaps into VWs.
    The S3, Integra Type-R and 911 are only diversions...I've always remained a VW owner along the way.

    I've been doing trackdays since 1992 and taking part/marshalling/attending hillclimbs/sprints since about the same time and on the twisty tracks I'm normally at, I've yet to see a Mk2 Golf with a VR6 fitted that outhandles a similar car with a lighter 16v fitted.

    It probably depends a lot on the track...but in my mind, fitting a V6 is adding handling problems you can do without.
     
  39. Dave_Bayern

    Dave_Bayern Slipping at 3.5Krpm

    1,913
    4
    36
    You only say thing when you KNOW its going to sound bolshy ;-)

    Yeah, Gary is considerably faster, and I can introduce you to someone almost as quick with a 150PD engine and 6 speed box in a Mk2 also.

    Perhaps if you look into current advancements with the VW motorsport and track day scene then you'd see a lot of VR6 conversions, although these days they tend to be the 24v R32 as opposed to the 12v VR6, and for good reason, they handle great with the right work done.

    Lets take the back seats out the Mk2 and whack that 911 engine, go ooooooon, you know you want to!
     
  40. Spacecowboy

    Spacecowboy Member

    357
    2
    18
    Yeah loving the 8 valvers. Tried that insuarance company and, cos my NCB is being used on the S3, gave me a quote of £360 for the year 3rd party. Starting to make it seem unreasonable to own 2 cars again
     

Share This Page