1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

re A4 1,8T avant quattro running costs

gary911 Sep 20, 2012

  1. gary911

    gary911 Member

    99
    37
    18
    Hi, is the A4. avant quattro 1.8t 190bhp 6 speed heavy on fuel in general driving as I have heard they can give as little as 21mpg .
    Is the car worth having remapped as its a bit dull .
    Thank you
     
  2. crazy88

    crazy88 Loving the anonymity

    4,939
    437
    83
    I've heard they are bad on fuel, although 21 seems a little low. I think most people get around 30mpg? I may be wrong though, as I have a 1.9tdi, so not too clued up on the 1.8t.
     
  3. matt1.8t

    matt1.8t Member

    70
    0
    6
    I have the same but not the Quattro and its the 163bhp option
    Mine averages 28mpg which is ****
     
  4. Avantsline

    Avantsline Member

    142
    42
    16
    I Bought one a month ago, Quattro 190 Sline & getting just above 30mpg.

    May remap down the line, but don't find it too slow yet!
     
  5. Dubbers1

    Dubbers1 Top Gear VCDS Map User

    261
    66
    28
    I can get pretty steady low 30's mpg and mine has been mapped and a couple of other bits as it is pretty grim standard but feels a lot more alive now
     
  6. KevM3

    KevM3 Member

    102
    0
    16
    is a 190 slightly better than a 163?
     
  7. matt1.8t

    matt1.8t Member

    70
    0
    6
    Power terms yes I think
     
  8. Dubbers1

    Dubbers1 Top Gear VCDS Map User

    261
    66
    28
    Its 27 better
     
    Inertiauk likes this.
  9. AlexGSi2000

    AlexGSi2000 Well-Known Member VCDS Map User

    1,461
    199
    63
    Yes have it re-mapped.

    This thread makes me feel slightly better about my 2.5TDi now.
     
  10. vroomtshh

    vroomtshh Active Member VCDS Map User

    362
    48
    28
    I get a regular real world 40mpg out of my 163 Quattro sport. I think a lot of it comes down to driving style.

    Ive never had it lower than 30mpg. IMO, don't bother getting it mapped, it'll still be dog slow and it'll be less reliable
     
  11. hades-

    hades- Yorkshire & Humber Rep. Regional Rep VCDS Map User

    9,480
    646
    113
    still be dog slow ?
    less reliable ?
    how do you come to that ?
     
  12. vroomtshh

    vroomtshh Active Member VCDS Map User

    362
    48
    28
    pretty simple really, mine is mapped, it's still dog slow and it's less reliable
     
  13. hades-

    hades- Yorkshire & Humber Rep. Regional Rep VCDS Map User

    9,480
    646
    113
    well in that case remaps are ****
    but what map have you got on there ?
     
  14. vroomtshh

    vroomtshh Active Member VCDS Map User

    362
    48
    28
    I never said remaps were ****. I said that a map on that particular model isn't hugely worthwhile.
    ive got a fully custom stage 2 map on mine with supporting mods. And IMO, it's still not enough power for the size of the car and the Quattro drivetrain losses.
     
  15. hades-

    hades- Yorkshire & Humber Rep. Regional Rep VCDS Map User

    9,480
    646
    113
    so what power are you putting out now ?
    and TQ
     
  16. Dubbers1

    Dubbers1 Top Gear VCDS Map User

    261
    66
    28
    Maybe thats down to the K03 turbo, the 190 has a K03s and mine feels like a totally different car and much more responsive, and no reliability issues so dont know where you're getting that generalisation from
     
  17. vroomtshh

    vroomtshh Active Member VCDS Map User

    362
    48
    28
    I have a k03s on mine.
     
  18. 666markyboy

    666markyboy Well-Known Member

    1,200
    49
    48
    I have the same engine in an A3 Quattro and never had more than 30 mpg out of it and thats motorway driving.... don't beleive the DIS if says your getting 40 mpg it's a very thirsty engine but has many good points,,,, it's very tunable , very strong when properly serviced and will still return reasonable mpg when thrashed but it's never going to be an ecco engine
     
  19. chasdrury

    chasdrury Member

    360
    17
    18
    I have a 163 Quattro, Stage 2 Remap, carbonio CAI, Milltek, Milltek CAT, Forge diverter valve etc and it's competely different to standard and much more reposnsive. Also, all that was done at approx 30k and it's now on 129600 miles - only normal wear and tear stuff has gone - crank sensor being the most recent and lots of suspension consumables - unrelated to the remap / engine work. Oh, and the blocked oil pick up but that again is nothing to do with the remap.

    I drive 2x days a week Leeds to Preston and in 60-70mph traffic easy get 40 real world (measured fill to fill). Went to london this weekend, did 32mpg over a whole tank. THat was Leeds - London and back to as far as Leicester forest east. Spritied drivng and lots of stop start in London (going south of the river). So i think not that bad overall.
     
  20. V6 Quatt

    V6 Quatt Well-Known Member

    1,248
    438
    83
    I had 190 and it drank very thirsty
     
  21. Slinepete

    Slinepete Member

    314
    16
    18
    I have a 190 not good on fuel but a lot better than my previous Impreza then again that was over 300bhp so in my eyes the 190 feels slow but I suppose it's not really,still could do with a bit more go for a big car but I'm kinda over the fast car thing this is my stepping stone to ween me off the power then into a diesel one day and hopefully something fast just for the weekends etc
     
  22. tom2

    tom2 Member

    167
    17
    18
    I have 190 quattro and its thirsty around town. I average 260miles on a tank around town. had the non quattro previous to this and was better on fuel and in the dry a bit quicker. I would get it re-mapped as i wouldn't describe them as fast, more just adequate.
     

Share This Page