1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hypothetically speaking stage 1 a3 vs stock s3

OVRA3 Jun 5, 2013

  1. OVRA3

    OVRA3 Well-Known Member

    1,079
    80
    48
    This is a very boy racer type question...

    My stage 1 a3 2.0 tfsi running 260 bhp and 279lbs ft torque vs stock s3 in a straight drag.. Who wins?

    Any s3 owners in east Anglia?
     
  2. S.

    S. Well-Known Member Team Ibis TFSI Owners Group quattro Audi S3 Manual

    1,894
    473
    83
    hahahaha
    the one that doesn't mess up the shifts :D
     
    S3Alex likes this.
  3. S3Alex

    S3Alex Rarely neutral Team Ibis Audi S3

    10,201
    4,264
    113
    If you work out the power/weight etc,it would be a very close run as you're level on both,and it then comes down to individual drivers and conditions.
     
  4. Tay

    Tay Active Member VCDS Map User

    449
    54
    28
    The person who's clutch doesn't slip...
     
  5. leeds2592

    leeds2592 When I grow up, I want a 964!

    1,399
    222
    63
    What about if both were DSG? Even closer?
     
  6. Ads

    Ads License to drive

    8,230
    607
    113
    All things being equal, there are a few scenarios which will give various outcomes....

    In a straight drag from standstill the s3 will do you if your 2.0t is fwd. If you're quattro then you'll probably get off the line quicker than the s3 but the s3 will eat up your quicker start pretty quickly and move past you.

    BUT from a rolling start its going to be very close for a while if your 2.0t is fwd. If it's quattro then the s3 will still have you.

    Basically, I've just come from a stage 1 2.0t and now drive a car with the same engine as an s3, and my 2.0t was a bit livelier under about 3k rpm, but above that the s3 unit with its bigger turbo wee's all over the k03'd 2.0t. The difference between the two is pretty significant.
     
  7. coreythorny

    coreythorny Active Member

    432
    71
    28
    You could also consider transmission losses from the S3's Quartro and power curves, whos at peak power and torque for longer.

    Closer than a Knats knacker probably.
     
  8. OVRA3

    OVRA3 Well-Known Member

    1,079
    80
    48
    Thanks gents, bit of a 'Gary boy' question but was interested, just need to find an s3 to drag, there arnt too many round these parts..
     
  9. Ads

    Ads License to drive

    8,230
    607
    113
    Just logged in using my normal browser and can see your sig now. Yours is quattro too. It's S3 all the way then.

    Also how accurate are your figures?? Sounds like a big gain from just a stage 1.
     
  10. Artimus

    Artimus Shortback

    2,004
    476
    83
    Don't want to hijack the thread but since it's been mentioned, does anyone know the transmission loss %age for FWD DSG Vs. Quattro DSG cars?

    cheers.
     
  11. DJ-S3

    DJ-S3 Active Member

    690
    43
    28
    Just my opinion but isn't your car 6.9seconds ish 0-60 standard? S3 is 5.5 ish. I know you'll have roughly the same power as the s3 stock but I never though a simple remap could take off that much of a chunk on the 0-60 times. I always thought it would be half a second. Could be wrong but if your right it means mines faster than a RS3 which I'd be happy with :D

    And before it gets pointed out I know the RS3 is a 2.5 and the cars were talking about are both 2.0. Just suggesting.
     
  12. TDI140

    TDI140 Well-Known Member

    1,623
    174
    63
    2.0t should have a very good chance i dont see how it would get away though it would stay up with it, same thing when a tdi140 is remapped and against a tdi170 the tdi 140 gets about 175bhp after remap so its a pretty fair race, but no offence the s3 is still the better car as it stage 1 remaps to 320bhp which is very impressive
     
  13. Ads

    Ads License to drive

    8,230
    607
    113
    It won't.

    There is definitely a tail off in power as the revs get above about 4.5k-5k in the 2.0T, remapped or not. You'll probably only notice this if you have driven both cars. Whereas the S3 really starts to march on as it hits about 3k through to 6k or so.

    As said, the 2.0T will stay with an S3 if racing in short bursts on the move, but as soon as it turns into a longer run with foot to the floor then the S3 is going to show why it's a lot more than an A3 with a few ECU tweaks.
     
  14. jaydav2306

    jaydav2306 Member

    217
    16
    16
    I've got a stock S3 S-Tronic but I still think with launch and the box it would prob piss all over it, especially in S mode with the increased throttle response
     
  15. andrecc

    andrecc Member

    253
    7
    18
    What about an tdi 170 bhp with a remap vs stock s3? Since the torque figures are better on diesel
     
  16. OVRA3

    OVRA3 Well-Known Member

    1,079
    80
    48
    ImageUploadedByTapatalk1370511085.369426.jpg

    Dyno was recalibrated before as mine was on after a stage 2+ s3 it's a custom map as opposed to a generic so it's been tweaked quite a bit whilst being logged
     
  17. Ads

    Ads License to drive

    8,230
    607
    113
    I believe that you are accurate about what the printout says, it's the dyno that I'm questioning. An extra +60bhp from a remap alone sounds a lot to me.

    Did you get a 'before' reading also?
     
  18. Ironborn

    Ironborn English...not so good

    1,177
    225
    63
    Diesels drag their feet too much at the start. It would get smoked
     
  19. sliced

    sliced Drive safe, stay alive.

    1,524
    327
    83
    Close race, From rolling about 60 A3 would probably get a little jump and then the s3 would take it after 90-100 or so
     
  20. OVRA3

    OVRA3 Well-Known Member

    1,079
    80
    48
    No before reading but the dyno is defo ok they've got a 200k set up soundproofed room amazing to watch.. The s3 stage 2+ made 336 quite conservative so dyno is reading right I think.. Mines had a lot of tweaks as I said on the map and I've got a very good tuner who has a tfsi himself so knows the engines well.

    Worth mentioning that the owners of the rolling road are revo dealers so were keen to promote their own software not my custom software so they wouldn't have been kind on the recalibration
     
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2013
  21. sliced

    sliced Drive safe, stay alive.

    1,524
    327
    83
    If it was a stage 2 TFSI a3 fwd vs S3 stock,then s3 would get advantage upto 50 or so then a3 would pull away :)


    (Assuming gti and 2.0t a3 are similar cars)
     
  22. Ads

    Ads License to drive

    8,230
    607
    113
    Guess all that's left is for you to find an S3 to have a tear up with then... ;)
     
  23. OVRA3

    OVRA3 Well-Known Member

    1,079
    80
    48
    Can't find one locally :-(

    Next year I'm going s3 I think too.. And straight to stage 1
     
  24. Turbo jay

    Turbo jay Leather repair specialist

    577
    69
    28
    Not bad for almost half the price of the the equivalent s3 there or there about's.
     
  25. OVRA3

    OVRA3 Well-Known Member

    1,079
    80
    48
    L
     
  26. OVRA3

    OVRA3 Well-Known Member

    1,079
    80
    48
     
  27. jimojameso

    jimojameso Active Member Team Nardo Section Mod Audi RS3 TTRS

    373
    171
    43
    Thing is though, the S3 has a better engine, drivetrain, brakes, suspension, bumpers, seats. Its not just the speed in a straight line that differentiates them.
     
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2013
  28. OVRA3

    OVRA3 Well-Known Member

    1,079
    80
    48
    This is very true and that's why next year ill be getting one! There is no more I can do with mine now without spending silly money....
     
  29. box500

    box500 Member

    163
    18
    18
    If you stick an S3 badge on it you will go even quicker :w00t:
     
  30. wuta3

    wuta3 Well-Known Member

    1,124
    345
    83
    Me reading this thread:

    [​IMG]

    Posting images heavily correlates with having nothing to contribute to the conversation.
     
    box500 likes this.
  31. OVRA3

    OVRA3 Well-Known Member

    1,079
    80
    48
    ImageUploadedByTapatalk1370546769.484386.jpg

    You love it when I do that ;-)
     
    wuta3 likes this.
  32. phil76

    phil76 Active Member

    572
    40
    28
    Having owned both Ko3 quattro mapped up and a standard when 1st got S3 i still think the S3 has a big difference what would show in a rip up,the torque on the KO4 gives you a lot more stronger pull definately,i was told my stage 1 map on my ko3 will give it around 245-260 and it was dyno'd at 248 without the evoms filter fitted so that may have knocked it up to around 250-255 with it been more free reving but the Ko4's are a different animal IMO
     
    Ads likes this.
  33. Ads

    Ads License to drive

    8,230
    607
    113
    +11111

    Exactly my point. Regardless of the similar power figures, the S3's power just has more weight to it.
    Can only really be understood and appreciated if you've owned/driven the two.
     
  34. S.

    S. Well-Known Member Team Ibis TFSI Owners Group quattro Audi S3 Manual

    1,894
    473
    83
    bit of OT, ads liking your rocco r. how good is it? any mods on it?
     
  35. Ads

    Ads License to drive

    8,230
    607
    113
    Thanks mate.

    I'm still liking it. They come well spec'd from factory, and the performance from stock is very good. I was a bit worried about it being FWD but VW seem to have done wonders in making it get all of the power down and the general handling.

    No mods made to it yet, but will keep it as it is until the new year then go stage 1.
     

Share This Page