Haldex question

Aky

Aky
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
1,512
Reaction score
3
Points
36
Location
West Yorkshire
When the haldex kicks in how much power does it send to the back wheels?

Does the Performance haldex put more power to the rear or does it put the same but just faster?

Is there anyway of getting a 70/30 split? (rear/front)
 
You can get one of the performance haldex controllers but i dont think it changes the split. From memory i think its more like 60/40 front.
 
Aky said:
When the haldex kicks in how much power does it send to the back wheels?

Does the Performance haldex put more power to the rear or does it put the same but just faster?

Is there anyway of getting a 70/30 split? (rear/front)

I actually thought is was an even 50/50. Could be wrong....

The Haldex performance controller won't change the torque split, it just changes the tollerences under which the diff clutch engages.
 
ChriS3[B said:
]I actually thought is was an even 50/50. Could be wrong....[/B]

The Haldex performance controller won't change the torque split, it just changes the tollerences under which the diff clutch engages.

Maybe its me thats wrong.... ?!
 
the maximum you can transfer to the rear wheels is 50%. All that different controllers do, is change the circumstances in which the power is transfered and removed, or even fix it 50/50.
 
The haldex system can put 'near 100%' of available power to the rear wheels in the right circumstances. I have an indepth explanation of what it can do on my PC but it came from this forum at some point. Try a search and if not I will post it up.
 
its physically impossible for it to transfer any more that 50% of the power to the rears.
 
Ok here is the article it goes on a bit:

Hello.

As the owner of an Audi S3 I make use of the Haldex LSC everyday. I am also
a member one particular Audi forum (www.audi-sport.net). We have discussed
the issues of Haldex, torque transfer and such like. In particular regard
comparing to Torsen.

The Haldex LSC solution is often seen as inferior and is often said to be
"not real 4WD". I disagree and believe it's abilities go beyond that of
Torsen when used in real driving scenarios.

I would greatly appreciate it if you could take the time and answer my
questions. I'll try to be as brief and as clear as possible. Thanks.

1) Haldex claim 100% torque transfer to the rear is possible. Is it? Some
people dispute this, but I believe it requires 100% slip of the front wheels
for this to be the case. i.e. In real conditions it would never happen, the
more realistic split is 50-70% under full load and some slip. I came to this
conclusion because the front wheels are always driven.

2) There is much dispute over whether the Haldex LSC delivers torque to the
rear if and only if the front wheels slip. It's my belief that the torque
transfer can and does occur in response to wide throttle openings, even
before any slippage occurs. Can you confirm?

3) With particular regard to the Audi S3 (or TT). Do you know if the
steering angle is taken into account when deciding whether to increase or
decrease the torque transfer? i.e. is it purely throttle/slip related or is
actually much more complex? If possible, some explanation would be useful.
For example, if there is 10% to the rear and I turn a corner, would it
increase to 30 or 40% to provide increased stability. If so, would be that
due to a natural left/right speed difference or a result of steering angle
change (ESP sensor)?

4) There is much debate on the "constant speed" torque transfer to the rear.
i.e. travelling on a road at 30 or 70MPH, how much torque is transferred to
the rear? Is it speed dependant?

5) Does the torque transfer under acceleration depend on the current vehicle
speed? If so, can you provide characteristic details?

Any further information you can provide would be appreciated, in particular
how the Haldex LSC operates in conjunction with the ESP and whether the ESP
can affect the transfer of torque.

The folk on the forums are an enthusiastic bunch who appreciate technical
explanations to technical problems. If there's anything else you can provide
beyond the questions I've asked, that would be very welcome. Once again, I
thank you again for taking the time to read my questions.


Cheers.

Mark.

-----------


Dear Mark,

I am pleased to see that you like your Audi S3 with the Haldex AWD system
and that you disagree with your Torsen friends when it comes to the
excellent abilities of the Haldex AWD System. It is a fact that the
electronically controlled Haldex AWD system provides a much wider range of
possibilities over a purely mechanical system. We are also convinced, after
having delivered 500.000 Haldex AWD systems to the market since our start in
1998, that we also have the best electronically controlled AWD system on the
market.

We have put together some answers on your questions that I hope will be
helpful in your discussions in the Audi forum.



1. There are situations where near 100% torque transfer to the rear axle
occur. An example is if the front wheels are on ice and the rear wheels are
on tarmac. In that case the front wheels have (almost) no grip. In that
case, the Haldex coupling will transfer all torque to the rear axle and
prevent front wheel spin. On uniform surfaces however, the coupling can not
transfer all torque to the rear axle. See below.

2. We need slip over the coupling in order to be able to transfer torque.
That slip (rotational speed difference between the front and rear axle) is
created by different tyre rolling radius (front to rear) and drive slip
between the tyre and road. The rolling raduis difference can be created by
differently worn tyres (or different dimensions, something that should be
avoided) and different load. In most cars, the front axle has a greater load
than the rear axle, which causes the roll radius of the front tire to be
smaller than the one for the rear tyres (given the same nominal size). This
gives us the possibility to transfer torque to the rear axle also when no
slip occurrs on the front tyres.

If you have differently worn tyres on the front and rear axles, the new
tyres should always be on the rear axle. This is true no matter if the car
is FWD, RWD or AWD, since you otherwise risk heavy and uncontrollable
oversteer in situations such as aqua planing. In this case, putting the worn
tyres at the front also helps not to reduce the maximum transferable torque
(maximum rear axle torque).

During cruising which a constant velocity, we have the possibility to
transfer up to 40-45% of the torque to the rear axle, given nominal tyres.
During acceleration, the weight transfer increase the front tyre slip and
decreases the rear axle slip, giving us the possibility to achieve more or
less the same torque distribution as the dynamic weight distribution.
Generally speaking, depending on the vehicle somewhere around 60-70% is
possible to achieve during a full acceleration. Note that we are still
talking about a uniform surface, with no spin on the front wheels.

When cornering , there is in most cars a tendency for the inner front wheel
to lift and spin. In that situation, we can increase the torque transfer
even further.

So far I have only spoken about what possibilities there is to transfer
torque. How much is actually transferred depends also on how the Haldex
coupling is controlled. The engine torque and gas pedal position are
together with the wheel speeds and the engine speed the most important
signals that are used in the control. Brake, ABS and ESP signals are also
very important for enabling co-existance between the AWD system and the
ABS/ESP system. We control the coupling in order to prevent wheel spin as
well as removing it quicky if it should occur.

3. Steering angle is not a signal used in the control of the coupling in VW
group cars. The reason for this is that the steering angle is not available
in most cars as it is only present when an ESP system is mounted. We do
however calculate the curve radius from the wheel speeds. We have software
ready using more signals as the steering angle that we offer to the vehicle
manufacturers. This enables further optimisation of handling performance.

4. It may vary a bit with speed (and road surface), but without going into
details a figure of around 10-15% would be typical. It is enough to help
stabilising the car while at the same time saving fuel and reducing the
temperature of certain driveline components. As soon as the driver starts to
accelerate or decelerate, more torque is transferred.

5. Yes it does. In general, a higher percentage of the torque is transferred
to the rear axle in low velicities than in high ones. This is partly due to
the fact that the total available driveline torque is larger at lower speeds
(and lower gears), thus causing more weight transfer to the rear axle. In
order to achieve consequent handling characteristics (as well as optimised
traction), more torque must then be transferred to the rear axle.

6. The Haldex coupling is completely compatible with ABS and ESP systems.
In order to optimise the performance of the ABS/ESP system, it is possible
to open the Haldex couplng during ABS braking or a stability control brake
intervension. The ABS/ESP antispinn and stability control also depend very
much on being able to calculate the vehicle velocity. That is very easy with
2WD, but as soon as you have the possibility of four wheels spinning it gets
very complicated. The Haldex coupling and ABS/ESP system interface make it
easier to obtain a good reference velocity.
In the cars where the Haldex coupling is available today, additional signals
available with ESP are not used. We do however have software using these
signals. This enables further optimisation of handling performance and life
span of driveline components.


During calibration of the Haldex coupling , we try to optimise the traction
and handling performance of the car. These are however not the only aspects
that are important. The final calibration is alway a compromise between
traction, handling, the life span of driveline components, temperatures in
driveline components, fuel consumption and more. If the car manufacturer
wants the same calibration to be used in several different cars, a new
compromise has to be made. Different manufacturers do have different
strategies about this. Some tend to let many cars share the same calibration
while others want to optimise each car individually.

I hope that this answers your questions.

Best Regards

Ulf Herlin
Vice President, Marketing
 
explain this one more tomorrow when back from pub ;)

essentially, the fronts are always driven, they cannot be disengaged - therefore upto 50% of the power that is being delivery to the front when wheelspinning is lost.
 
I'm with you on this one Madvw, it's actually very simple, yet so complex. The detailed explanation and answers you have posted up makes for interesting reading Colinra, as it's all true and from the horses mouth, but we have to keep things simple for most of us to understand.
My basic explanation is that with the front wheels being directly connected to the transmission, and the rears taking power from a transfer box on the gearbox, the maximum 'drive' to both the front and rear axles is 50:50 with the haldex fully engaged. But in the extreme condition, where the front axle/wheels is slipping on ice or off the ground(free wheeling), then the car would have to rely on the rear wheels to push it along, which is where the 100% torque to the rear wheels come in.
You have to differentiate between drive between the front and rear axles and torque distribution, where grip is available.
 
so if accelerating hard and there is no slip at the front would all the power still be going through the front wheels, meaning there is not as much transmission loss?
 
edward_harris said:
so if accelerating hard and there is no slip at the front would all the power still be going through the front wheels, meaning there is not as much transmission loss?
I wouldn't worry about transmission loss with the power yours will have.
 
edward_harris said:
so if accelerating hard and there is no slip at the front would all the power still be going through the front wheels, meaning there is not as much transmission loss?


Generally yes, but if you had the performance controller, then you'd be able to get power to all four wheels on throttle position.
 
edward_harris said:
so if accelerating hard and there is no slip at the front would all the power still be going through the front wheels, meaning there is not as much transmission loss?

on full acceleration, the OEM haldex will transfer 50% to the rear even though the fronts aren't spinning.
 
cheers jojo that makes it more clear to me. I think we will all agree that it is a very clever system.
 
madvw said:
on full acceleration, the OEM haldex will transfer 50% to the rear even though the fronts aren't spinning.

Nope, I'm afraid it won't. Its the performance controller that uses throttle position, the OEM version only uses front wheel slip.
 
ChriS3 said:
Nope, I'm afraid it won't. Its the performance controller that uses throttle position, the OEM version only uses front wheel slip.

If the OEM controller doesnt transfer on full power regardless, i'd expect load more squat from the rear when accelerating harshly? Theres never any wheelspin when flooring it from a standing start, barely even a chirp from the tyres.

I thought that OEM was 4wd on full power(or wheelspin), whereas the performance controllers shifted more to the rears earlier on (less throttle position), giving a more predictable front-> rear shift and partial (or full?) 4WD when on part throttle whilst cornering?

happy to be proved wrong as always, because i really want to know better how these things work!! :icon_thumright:
 
AFAIK, the OE Haldex controller will fully engage the Haldex coupling to 50:50 drive on full throttle, or engage partial drive to the rears on part throttle upon a difference in axle speeds of the front and rear, as little as 4degrees in slip, so very quick to respond, but still a delayed response. Where as the uprated Haldex controller is more sensitive to throttle input and would lock up the Haldex fully on half throttle or more, so makes it more responsive and predictable?
 
ChriS3 said:
Nope, I'm afraid it won't. Its the performance controller that uses throttle position, the OEM version only uses front wheel slip.

so on a dry day with the oem version and no slip on the front you would have more power at the wheels as it's not in 4wd mode! so really power wise id be better keeping the oem version?
 
edward_harris said:
so on a dry day with the oem version and no slip on the front you would have more power at the wheels as it's not in 4wd mode! so really power wise id be better keeping the oem version?

Realistically Edward, the most power a hatchback should have going through the front wheels was suppose to be 200BHP, but since modern hatchback are bigger and heavier, we are seeing 250BHP, and you will have 370 horses to hold back!
I personally don't think you will benefit from a performance haldex controller if straight line performance is your main target, as you probably wouldn't feel the difference. It's more of a handling thing by having predictable traction mid corner, knowing what the haldex will do when you boot it mid turn. :racer:
 
jojo said:
Realistically Edward, the most power a hatchback should have going through the front wheels was suppose to be 200BHP, but since modern hatchback are bigger and heavier, we are seeing 250BHP, and you will have 370 horses to hold back!
I personally don't think you will benefit from a performance haldex controller if straight line performance is your main target, as you probably wouldn't feel the difference. It's more of a handling thing by having predictable traction mid corner, knowing what the haldex will do when you boot it mid turn. :racer:

lol, well im gonna try get one chucked in from aps, see what they say!
 
For those of you that say it can't be more then a 50:50 split to the rear, I think you are missing what was said by haldex themselves, it is possible to be nearly 100% going to the rear in for example the situation where both fronts were on ice and the rears had full grip. Then the fronts would only be using the percentage of the torque required to keep the fronts moving, very unlikely but possible.
 
god_thats_quick said:
For those of you that say it can't be more then a 50:50 split to the rear, I think you are missing what was said by haldex themselves, it is possible to be nearly 100% going to the rear in for example the situation where both fronts were on ice and the rears had full grip. Then the fronts would only be using the percentage of the torque required to keep the fronts moving, very unlikely but possible.

yeah, I was trying to put it into words what i was thinking, but it never came out...as usual! I understand what they're saying - that if the fronts have 0% grip and are spinning without any resistance, and the rears DO have grip, then 100% of power is therefore being applied through the rears..

The more scientifically minded will see instantly that some of the torque will already be mopped up in the effort needed to make the fronts spin - so i guess its no suprise that the response from haldex was from the VP of MARKETING.....
 
so when the OEM version does kick in to 4wd IE when there is slip at the front. when does it convert back to front wheel again? IE say you were going round a corner and it went into 4wd when would it switch back to front wheel, half way through the corner, or when?!
 
edward_harris said:
so when the OEM version does kick in to 4wd IE when there is slip at the front. when does it convert back to front wheel again? IE say you were going round a corner and it went into 4wd when would it switch back to front wheel, half way through the corner, or when?!

whenever the fronts had sufficient grip - be it after the corner or mid corner. Thats why its called unpredictable, and why people go for the performance controller.
 
madvw said:
whenever the fronts had sufficient grip - be it after the corner or mid corner. Thats why its called unpredictable, and why people go for the performance controller.

oh ok so the uprated version goes on throttle position does it come in at full throttle or half way?
 
god_thats_quick said:
For those of you that say it can't be more then a 50:50 split to the rear, I think you are missing what was said by haldex themselves, it is possible to be nearly 100% going to the rear in for example the situation where both fronts were on ice and the rears had full grip. Then the fronts would only be using the percentage of the torque required to keep the fronts moving, very unlikely but possible.

I thought I did explain it quite clearly in my earlier post, obviously not lol

You have to differentiaite between drive and Torque distribution! the drive will always be 50:50, with the Haldex fully engaged it impossible for it to be anything else. And as I mentioned earlier, you can have 100% of the torque going through the rear axles if the fronts was freewheeling....
 
edward, the haldex doesnt work like a switch, it will start so transfer torque to the rear axle until the speed difference between the axles are 0...so realistically the only time 50:50 drive spilt occurs is during full throttle drop clutch starts, or under slippery conditions.

heres a good link:

http://www.haldex-traction.com/default.htm
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
729
I
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
668
Replies
21
Views
9K