£35 ones don't last long. Trust me I had one.
Suppose buy cheap buy twice eh
£35 ones don't last long. Trust me I had one.
View attachment 82586
I decided to try a turbo blanket purely because I wanted to do something to car the thing smoked like a barsteward for a few miles and been fine since it defiantly has kept the bay a bit cooler
View attachment 82587
bay cooler, but not the turbo dude.. it will run hotter now
Driven lots mate, usually after being asked to solve the long / soft pedal issues people experience after fitting.
These can be partly avoided by very careful / thorough bleeding including the mc, but the fact remains they are a poor match to the 8L 23.8mm master cylinder and require considerably more fluid displacement to operate.
Very pretty things, but functionally frustrating. If you're a keen driver you'll struggle to heel n toe without pedal alterations.
Like I said man, I hate being negative, and I absolutely love your car. I just like to make sure people fully understand the implications of certain mods.
I'll do the sums this evening and let you know
As the 996T are slightly larger than stock it won't be quite such a jump I guess.
Right, numbers for you Rob.
The stock 54mm sliding S3 caliper has an area of 2290mm².
The 996TT calipers have pistons of 38 and 42mm, giving an area of 2520mm², an additional 10% travel.
The 18Z have an area of 2750mm², so 2750/2290 = 1.2009, or 20% pedal travel increase over stock. This to me is quite noticeable.
Comparing the 996TT to the 18z, we have 2750 / 2520 = 1.09, so 9%. In reality you may not notice this difference too much as your pedal travel is already increased 10% from stock.
For me, that 10% over stock is the sweet spot. Softer and longer than would be ideal in a perfect world, but not enough to really upset things.
The 20% the 18Z give is for me a little too much, and I believe the driving experience suffers as a result, but in reality, coming from the 996TT you probably won’t be TOO bothered by it, even if the pedal will be longer than is ideal.
Regardless of all of the above, they will certainly look pretty
That's a interesting thought dudeWhat if it isn't as simple as comparing piston sizes. Construction inside the calipers may not be that simple, meaning the piston isn't getting pushed by its whole area, using more fluid. Just a thought.
They may maintain a smaller internal volume/area, maintaining force applied to simply a bigger piston, somehow.
Exactly, because fluids are (almost entirely) incompressible. In a pneumatic system, chamber volume comes into play, because there is more air to compress.Total system volume is unimportant, only fluid displacement.
KVB constant but cant go high enough for all injectorsYeah same happens with my readings. Not as inconsistent as yours as my injectors are only 550cc but it always over-estimates for sure. There is a way I'm sure to do it. My tuner said there was and it was simple, but you'll have to ask the boys here for a more detailed explanation.
Goubo, best of luck. Hope it doesn't give you too much trouble. If and when I do have a question or two I'll make sure to PM you.
I hear you had some fun with a tte420 leon cupra... lolYeah it's proper quick mate a few bikes have found that out as has a Aston Martin virage 2011 model...various 911s...m3s..rs4s... 8v and 8p s3s in different levels of tune
Can honestly say anything I've had a play with I've always been miles ahead
For me reliability has been as I expected from a 300+bhp per litre car that gets driven hard every chance I get as its hard not to use the power when you get the chance
I have my mate convinced I can get 855 miles to a tank because it says it on the dash haha because it has huge injectors the dash reads it wrong he finds the miles per tank more impressive than the power haha
I hear you had some fun with a tte420 leon cupra... lol
he spoke well of your car
crazy men...
I actually like it over reading to wind people up that with 600+bhp I can get 800 odd miles per tank haha...
You and me both!
The Syvecs ECU on mine needs a few little things sorting,and one of them is it's idea of MPG.
There's obviously a divide by 4 error in the system somewhere as it thinks I'm getting 80+mpg.
I wish......
On the other hand,dishing it out to the "faster" cars that cost 5 times as much is quite funny.
I know it's such a buzz when you shock some real high end cars...the dude in the Aston gave me the thumbs up and was just shaking his head and laughing when he caught up at the roundabout
I've found the AMG guys don't cope so well....
Must be German car rivalry or something.
It's probably the fact that they have double or triple your displacement WITH twin turbos and still getting their *** handed to them. I'd be upset, too.