1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Golf v Clio

Discussion in 'Volkswagen and other VAG' started by stoakseya4, Mar 12, 2008.

  1. stoakseya4
    Offline

    stoakseya4 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,221
    Likes Received:
    5
    [Mar 12, 2008]
    OK, so a Mk5 GTI vs a Clio 197 F1 ?

    What would you have?
    It's intended as a run-around with the occasional track day too.

    I appreciate a golf comes with a 5-door option, and as well as being a turbo, can be re-mapped up to c285bhp with a Milltek/induction ket etc (Revo).

    The clio is only a 3-door, and being a n/a engine has limited tuning possibilities. A remap, exhaust, induction kit will take it to c230bhp...


    Comments ?
    #1
  2. Ads

    Ads

    [Oct 21, 2014]

  3. Bong Water
    Offline

    Bong Water In two minds

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2007
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    0
    [Mar 12, 2008]
    I personally wouldnt touch a Renault if it was out of warranty
    #2
  4. phantom
    Offline

    phantom On Boost

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,750
    Likes Received:
    0
    [Mar 18, 2008]
    Hiya mate, Cliosports NEVER put out the book BHP , a 197 will be more like 190 , Renault N/A engaines are really hard to tune!

    A remap , zorst , and induction kit will give you 210bhp MAX to get 230bhp you'll need all of the above and a set of cams! which all in will be 2.5-3k.

    I had the 182 version , there hard work to tune. i'd go with the Golf or just get a 172 cup for 5k and leave it std , a std cup would wipe the floor with a 197!

    p
    #3
  5. Ess_Three
    Offline

    Ess_Three Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2001
    Messages:
    5,383
    Likes Received:
    6
    [Mar 18, 2008]
    GTI every time..
    The Clio feels under-engined since it's got bigger and heavier.
    The Golf is just...superb!
    #4
  6. Sohrob
    Offline

    Sohrob Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2008
    Messages:
    351
    Likes Received:
    3
    [May 29, 2008]
    Two completely different cars imo, the golf is also to nice to be taking on the track.

    My brother had a 197 after a CTR and the engine was a let down, quite torquey but just didnt feel quick. The handling and braking is where the 197 comes into its own, i have not driven a modern FWD that grips and brakes so well even in the wet. A good choice for a track car but not got the class of the golf, also the earlier models had a very short 6th gear meaning for motorway crusing they were noisey.

    Phase 1 172 and a slightly older golf would be my choice, a decent phase 1 can be had for £3k.
    #5
  7. GT130
    Offline

    GT130 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    247
    Likes Received:
    0
    [May 29, 2008]
    Golf everytime i would say...
    #6
  8. Oranoco
    Offline

    Oranoco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,209
    Likes Received:
    204
    [Jun 4, 2008]
    Early Cio 172 Cup gets my vote. Friend of mine got one for his wife and then spent more tim eplaying with it than his own Impreza as he said it was more fun. They're also cheap enough that if you bend it you won't cry.
    #7

Share This Page