1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

any spec info on 96 a4

Discussion in 'A4/S4 forum(B5 Chassis)' started by graham A4, Jan 24, 2009.

  1. graham A4

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    does any know roughly what the bhp and 0-60 time would be on a 98 a4 1.6e
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide this advert.
  3. Oranoco

    Oranoco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,543
    Likes Received:
    291
    Judging by my old A4 1.6 I would say about 100bhp and 0-60 in about 15 seconds. I found I was ragging the living daylights out of it all the time.
     
  4. griswold

    griswold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    344
    Likes Received:
    5
    Just had a look on parkers if I got right model
    0-60 11.5 101bhp propbably less if tired and not looked after
     
  5. Broken Byzan

    Broken Byzan Photographic Moderator
    Staff Member Moderator VCDS Map User Audi A4 quattro

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Messages:
    13,021
    Likes Received:
    395
    yeah the 1.8 SE wasnt much quicker it was 10.5 iirc

    I hope mine is around half that now,lol
     
  6. aragorn

    aragorn "Stick a V8 in it!"
    Staff Member Moderator VCDS Map User

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Messages:
    16,695
    Likes Received:
    477
    you'll probably find the 1.8T will do better fuel economy than the 1.6 as your not having to kick its arse all day long to get it moving...

    Imo a 1.6 A4 would be horrible to drive. Likely similar to driving a 1.0 12v corsa...
     
  7. olds_kool

    olds_kool Active Member
    VCDS Map User

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,076
    Likes Received:
    8
    according to 98 brochure
    101 bhp at 5300rpm
    140nm at 3800rpm
    119 top speed
    and 0-60 11.9 sec.
     
  8. Broken Byzan

    Broken Byzan Photographic Moderator
    Staff Member Moderator VCDS Map User Audi A4 quattro

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Messages:
    13,021
    Likes Received:
    395
    My 1.8t is better on fuel than the 1.8NA ever was. And a bit faster too,lol
     
  9. Siena

    Siena Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,626
    Likes Received:
    5
    Yes, the 1,6 is slow.

    But nicer to drive than the 1,8 20V n/a - it's a nasty car to drive.
    Yes, it has 25PS more than the 1,6, but it just felt lifeless at low speeds, was harder to keep it on the boil when moving in fairly dense traffic.

    The 1,6 on the other hand, felt a lot more linear in character.
     
  10. olds_kool

    olds_kool Active Member
    VCDS Map User

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,076
    Likes Received:
    8
    and quicker than i thought it would be
     
  11. aragorn

    aragorn "Stick a V8 in it!"
    Staff Member Moderator VCDS Map User

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Messages:
    16,695
    Likes Received:
    477
    is the 1.6 an 8v?

    If so you'll likely find the torque spread sits much lower down the rev range, which makes it feel more willing when just pootling around town.

    Back when i had the nova, it had a 1.6 16v making 110hp, at the time craig had a nova 1.2 with 50hp. To drive them around town normally, the 1.2 felt notably more lively at low RPM's but obviously if you did plant the boot, nothing happened, whereas the 16v did very little until about 4k then took off.

    Most modern 16v engines get round this with various tricks like VVT, switchable inlet tracts, and turbochargers, but a multivalve engine without those tends to be very peaky.
     
  12. Broken Byzan

    Broken Byzan Photographic Moderator
    Staff Member Moderator VCDS Map User Audi A4 quattro

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Messages:
    13,021
    Likes Received:
    395
    like the Vtec, i really want to drive one of those @ 9k lol
     
  13. aragorn

    aragorn "Stick a V8 in it!"
    Staff Member Moderator VCDS Map User

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Messages:
    16,695
    Likes Received:
    477
    ye vtec is an example thats used to the extreme i guess, below the VTEC limit you have a VERY mild set of cams, to allow good tractability and good fuel economy, then above it you bring in a nice wild set of cams to extract good power.

    Honda actually have a few different models of VTEC, and some of the more cooking spec models have something called VTEC-E which as far as i know, basically only uses one inlet valve at low RPM's to bring the torque band right down, then uses both if you stick the boot in to give an acceptable level of power.
     

Share This Page