Hi all,
Now yes the title is abit strange, and obviously the TDI loses out.
However the main contemplation being between the 3.2 vs A3 2.0T thread again.
- Is .5 of a second noticable in accleration, and on from that say at 70 MPH in 5/6th which would be quicker to say 90-100 MPH. I'd say the 3.2 but it's heavier and praps not as much torque lower down the range. Dunno this is why I am asking for user opinions as to is it really noticable the difference.
If not then is the 2.0T the best option for costs which I suspect it is and is most likely plain obvious. A chipped 2.0T maybe a different kettle of fish.
As for the 2.0 TDI which I currently own would it out accelerate in any case any of the above two as I know they pull in any gear and just go like the wind. It's the 2.0T which raises my eyebrows a little.
DM - Videos of 2.0T please anyone ( vids@david-mann.com ) /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beerchug.gif
Now yes the title is abit strange, and obviously the TDI loses out.
However the main contemplation being between the 3.2 vs A3 2.0T thread again.
- Is .5 of a second noticable in accleration, and on from that say at 70 MPH in 5/6th which would be quicker to say 90-100 MPH. I'd say the 3.2 but it's heavier and praps not as much torque lower down the range. Dunno this is why I am asking for user opinions as to is it really noticable the difference.
If not then is the 2.0T the best option for costs which I suspect it is and is most likely plain obvious. A chipped 2.0T maybe a different kettle of fish.
As for the 2.0 TDI which I currently own would it out accelerate in any case any of the above two as I know they pull in any gear and just go like the wind. It's the 2.0T which raises my eyebrows a little.
DM - Videos of 2.0T please anyone ( vids@david-mann.com ) /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beerchug.gif