bacardi said:And you put yours on the front where it can make your car over steer off the road. Your money your choice.
bowfer said:But that's my point.
In 23 years of driving FWD cars (amongst others) it's never, ever, happened.
You're opinion is that's luck.
My opinion is the tyres have been up to the job.
I'm not being flippant, grip is important to me.
I thrash my car like a ginger haired stepchild.
But I've never found rear end grip, in a FWD car, to be a massive problem.
The odd little twitch and slide, yes, but nothing that's made me think the tyres were 'off'.
My current back tyres are only at 3mm, and were transferred from the front.
Again, no grip problems at all.
The front can slip, slide and drift all over the place, the rear remains stuck to the road.
I can concede the scenario is possible, but I believe you would have to fit some seriously mismatched compounds for the back to overtake the front, in a FWD car.
Remember compound is just as important, if not more so, than tread depth.
JamS3 said:Hows this?
rich1068 said:What sort of car is that? FWD or RWD? The BMW that appears briefly is obviously RWD but what about the other?
rich1068 said:Go on 'sleep envy'. I want to read what you deleted.
JamS3 said:
JamS3 said:Well each to their own but as said above this is fact tried and tested so it cant really be argued with unless someone finds something to put on here which disproves those vids.
JamS3 said:Well each to their own but as said above this is fact tried and tested so it cant really be argued with unless someone finds something to put on here which disproves those vids.
JamS3 said:Its gone very quiet on this thread all of a sudden.......
Yea watched it now. It looked like an ad on QVC!bacardi said:did you watch the video?
mitch78 said:Correct, the laws of physics can't be bent.
As some people are obsessed with stating outright facts and not simply what has been experienced in real world driving situations, these are the 2 simple facts upon which my previous comments are based.
(Just to be provocative )
Fact 1: In the dry, part worn rear tyres have as much rubber in contact with the surface of the road as new tyres. Therefore there is a similar level of friction between the tyre and the surface of the road, resulting in similar levels of grip and a similar handling bias in terms of over/understeer.
Fact 2: Part worn tyres have less ability to disperse water than new tyres due to the lower tread depth being able to accommodate a smaller volume of water, therefore they will lose grip more easily in damp conditions than new tyres, due to a possible build up of water between the tyre and the road.
smee said:Yea watched it now. It looked like an ad on QVC!
I know from experience you put new tyres where they are required. ALL new tyres be they on the front or rear will be slippy! We all know that. The question was more about where new tyres should be placed on a Quattro car. A responsible driver will always take it easy until new tyres "bed in" so where they are fitted is pretty much an irrelevance.
smee said:New rubber should be on the driving and steering wheels is the point I was trying to make. We dont have the luxury of running half worn out tyres on all wheels. So if tyres need to be replaced put them where they do the most work.
mitch78 said:Can I refer you back to my very first post on this thread:
If we're talking about driving in dry conditions at a sensible (I don't mean slow) speed then you'll not notice much difference with the part worn's at the back, but will notice the improvement with new tyres at the front. So I've not changed my mind at all, it's just that some people try homing in on one sentence ignoring the rest of the posts and go off on one saying I'm wrong, they're right.