Which would you have ?
- Thread starter ikechukwu
- Start date
wilko
Top Gear
Eeef
Lord of War
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2004
- Messages
- 1,607
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 36
- Location
- South Coast, land of the white man
Without doubt the S3. Chipped it's going to be somewhere near 50bhp up on the 3.2 and considerably lighter as well.
And it looks a lot better
Wouldn't buy one for 6-12 months though to see what the price does.
And it looks a lot better
Wouldn't buy one for 6-12 months though to see what the price does.
mikep
Registered User
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2003
- Messages
- 591
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 16
- Location
- Wetheringsett, Suffolk
- Website
- www.pragamtik-ict.co.uk
remapped S3....
the weight is better, more torque, better mpg and it will be more chuckable, but the acceleration won't be as linear as the 3.2 or sound quite as good.
the weight is better, more torque, better mpg and it will be more chuckable, but the acceleration won't be as linear as the 3.2 or sound quite as good.
