Hi, been a member here for a while but haven't owned an Audi for a few years since my C5 1.8T was written off.
Anyway, my neighbour has had for a couple of months a 2011 2.0 TDi 170 Le Mans avant with manual gearbox.
He came to that after a 2.7 TDi C6, 2007.
He's been saying that he can't get better than 40.5mpg from the 2.0 even when trying really hard to get good economy.
He was getting better than that with the V6 and is wondering if there's a fault with the car. I drove it the other day and it's obviously very different to the last V6 but it did feel a bit flat to me, and the economy wasn't great.
The manual states 4.7l / 100km which equates to 49mpg (combined) but it won't go anywhere near there.
Anyone else running one of these with better results ?
Thanks.
Anyway, my neighbour has had for a couple of months a 2011 2.0 TDi 170 Le Mans avant with manual gearbox.
He came to that after a 2.7 TDi C6, 2007.
He's been saying that he can't get better than 40.5mpg from the 2.0 even when trying really hard to get good economy.
He was getting better than that with the V6 and is wondering if there's a fault with the car. I drove it the other day and it's obviously very different to the last V6 but it did feel a bit flat to me, and the economy wasn't great.
The manual states 4.7l / 100km which equates to 49mpg (combined) but it won't go anywhere near there.
Anyone else running one of these with better results ?
Thanks.