How I got stage 1 power (245hp) on stock software for £20

Flexiblemouse

Registered User
Joined
Jan 12, 2014
Messages
258
Reaction score
60
Points
28
Location
Coventry, United Kingdom
As I was so badly ridiculed in the remap thread I was just going to log out and never come back to this forum, but I have had PM's asking me how I managed to get stage 1 power for only £20. So I decided that I would come back and explain in detail the process I followed to get from 200hp to 245hp on the stock tune.

First a disclaimer: I am not a mechanic or engineer, I am not affiliated with any tuning companies, nor do I have anything against companies who provide remaps. I did these modifications to my own car, at my own risk, and spent hours researching first. I do not recommend that you do this to your own car, that is something you must decide on yourself, I do not care if you blow up your car attempting this, however if you do decide to do it feel free to message me if you need any advice. Also, and I cannot stress this enough, IF YOU HAVE NOTHING CONSTRUCTIVE TO ADD TO THIS THREAD, DO NOT POST. I don't want to hear about limp mode, how my turbo will blow, how my pistons will melt etc etc because it is a load of crap. Also, this modification was done to a stock 2006 A3 8P with the 2.0T FSI (BWA) engine on a K03 turbocharger, if you have a different spec then your results may differ.

I used a manual boost controller (bleed valve) to control the boost instead of the factory N75 valve. If you would like to read up on boost controllers, go to Boost controller - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. If you would like to see how they areHTML.ted and used, visit How To Install A Bleed Valve - YouTube, or Turbo Supporting Mods - YouTube. If you would like one, it seems that one of the best available is available from Go Fast Bits at http://www.gfb.com.au/products/boost-controllers/atomic-single-stage-boost-controller-by-gfb. My budget had already been spent on an upgraded diverter valve (also available from Go Fast Bits) so I bought a budget valve from eBay for £20.

When I was researching modifications, I went to the websites of various remap providers and found that stage 1 made 240-245hp depending on the company. Unfortunately the companies do not usually tell you what they did to get that power, until I came across Unitronic. They had dyno graphs of each stage, and even a small explanation of what constitutes each stage. As you can see at Audi A3 2.0 TFSI stage 1, the information for stage 1 reads "Performance Software Precisely Engineered to Run 17psi of Boost on a Completely Stock Car." If you open the dyno plot for stage 1 you will see that with stock software the torque peaks at 2500rpm. This is because the turbo has spooled up to 8.7psi and the N75 will hold that value until 4500rpm when the turbo can no longer supply enough air to maintain that boost. If you compare the old torque curve with the stage 1 curve, you will see that torque peaks later, at 2800rpm, this is because it takes longer for the turbo to spool to 17psi than 8.7psi. You can also see that the torque stays high until 4500rpm, when again the turbo cannot maintain pressure. Unfortunately with a bleed type valve your torque will drop sooner in comparison due to the wastegate cracking slightly open as boost builds, (to fix this you could fit an electronic boost controller which is expensive, or a ball and spring boost controller from eBay for about £20). If you now look at the stage 1+ dyno graph (254hp @ 19psi) you can see the torque line is now very different to the stock line, this shows that they did not simply add more boost to get there, but that is a more aggressive tune as well. As the stage 1 and OEM lines were very similar you can see that apart from running much higher boost, the tune is not much different from stock.

So 245hp @ 17psi seemed like about as far as I could take my power on the factory tune. I fitted my valve and increased the boost from wastegate pressure to 17psi over a period of 2 weeks. Each time I peaked at a new level I ran a log of a 3rd gear 30mph-redline WOT run, monitoring rpm, load, boost, AFR, timing and MAF values. I would check the log immediately to see if it ran lean at any point, or if the turbo surged at all, as well as to see how much power was produced at the crank. The peak from the MAF can be (appapproximately) converted to crank horsepower by diving it by 0.8 or multiplying it by 1.25. My log at 8.7psi (stock boost) showed a peak of 162g/s which is around 200hp, so far so good. I logged 217hp @ 12.5psi, and 236hp @ 15psi. I stopped there because I noticed I was getting diminishing returns, each new psi gave less power than the one before. This is because the turbo is blowing hotter air (as it is out of its efficient range) and because of the restrictive downpipe (which is why it is changed at stage 2). I needed to find a compressor map for the K03 to see how far I could take things without blowing something up. I finally found a map, and some research done by another enthusiast on the K03 at K03 Compressor Map - VW GTI Forum / VW Rabbit Forum / VW R32 Forum / VW Golf Forum - Golfmkv.com. I used the blank map and added plots for 10-20psi, which can be found at http://www.audi-sport.net/vb/a3-s3-sportback-8p-chassis/210918-k03-compressor-map-2-0t.HTML. As you can see, the K03 is too small to hold a lot of boost to high rpm which is why the S3 uses a K04. At 17psi and 3000rpm the turbo is getting near to the choke line and will not hold at 17 for long, indeed at 19psi you will be lucky to hold it til 3500rpm. With my car set to 17psi @ 3000rpm in 3rd gear, it spikes to 19psi momentarily in 1st and 2nd gear but that is still below the turbo's maximum wheel speed. All logs checked out OK, the injectors are perfectly happy supplying the extra fuel and did not hit limp mode at all. The forum will not upload my log (something about the format) but here is a screenshot.

As you can see, my peak was 195.83g/s which works out to about 244.8 HP, ignore the 40-60 as I had 2 passengers and a full tank. There you have it folks, and if you are just about to post and flame me, don't bother!.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2014-03-04-17-49-12.jpg
    Screenshot_2014-03-04-17-49-12.jpg
    19.4 KB · Views: 1,423
  • Like
Reactions: mister.c. and gussyldr
Read end to end, enjoyed reading, no idea if it is a good approach, but this time I won't tape a brick to my foot ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Artimus
The GFB controller gets a good review generally,and is easy to use.

The Gizzmo MS-IBC is an alternative,but complex,and requires a fair bit of tweaking to get things like gain and so on correct.

One question......are you doing anything to the fuelling at all,or relying on the lambda probe and ECU to sort that side out?
 
I am relying on the ECU to maintain the AFR, but I monitor it religiously. I'm using torque pro and a good Bluetooth adapter, no problems yet, gets nice and rich high in the revs. I also use premium fuel to reduce the chances of pre detonation.
 
Be interesting to know what the internal temperatures are, my guess it's gonna run so hot you'll be melting the pistons before you know it. There's a reason people remap instead of just spending 20 quid unfortunately. You've gotta adjust the fueling and timing too, it's not all about just increasing the boost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: phil76, Rhyso and S3Alex
Be interesting to know what the internal temperatures are, my guess it's gonna run so hot you'll be melting the pistons before you know it. There's a reason people remap instead of just spending 20 quid unfortunately. You've gotta adjust the fueling and timing too, it's not all about just increasing the boost.

I can tell you didn't read my disclaimer...

Also let me add that I do not drive like an idiot, around town I rarely get into boost at all, and I never give it the beans for long.
 
  • Like
Reactions: antowens and Lambster
I am relying on the ECU to maintain the AFR, but I monitor it religiously. I'm using torque pro and a good Bluetooth adapter, no problems yet, gets nice and rich high in the revs. I also use premium fuel to reduce the chances of pre detonation.

Don't take this the wrong way.....basically you're relying on that to ensure you don't go lean at any time,and for the most part,it should(and clearly does) work,but in a sense,it's fooling the ECU by bypassing the N75.

There may come a point at which fuelling won't be adequate,and unless you're using a real-time wideband AFR meter,you're relying on historical data from previous logging.

Like I said,don't take it the wrong way,as it's not intended that way,but it's not the way I could run my engine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: phil76, Rhyso, wuta3 and 1 other person
I can tell you didn't read my disclaimer...

Also let me add that I do not drive like an idiot, around town I rarely get into boost at all, and I never give it the beans for long.

Getting defensive when somebody criticises you is why everyone gets their backs up and starts not taking it seriously. Not cool bro, not cool.

If you are gonna go on a forum and say u get stage 1 with £20, then reject anyones opinion of the downsides, you're gonna need to take your "just tell me im awesome" disclaimer elsewhere.

I call it that because Smurfworth's statement "There's a reason people remap instead of just spending 20 quid unfortunately. You've gotta adjust the fueling and timing too, it's not all about just increasing the boost" was constructive and critical. Seems like you just want constructive, and by that I mean flattering.
 
I can tell you didn't read my disclaimer...

Also let me add that I do not drive like an idiot, around town I rarely get into boost at all, and I never give it the beans for long.

I'd like to point out that I am a mechanical engineer.

Personally I couldn't care less if you do melt the pistons, it can and will happen.

All I'm saying is, keep an eye on the internal temperatures to make sure they don't exceed the recommended.

You don't have to drive fast or hard to create insanely hot internal temperatures. I suggest you research internal temperatures and how what you've done can alter them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: martinivw, phil76, Rhyso and 1 other person
I'd like to point out that I am a mechanical engineer.

Personally I couldn't care less if you do melt the pistons, it can and will happen.

All I'm saying is, keep an eye on the internal temperatures to make sure they don't exceed the recommended.

You don't have to drive fast or hard to create insanely hot internal temperatures. I suggest you research internal temperatures and how what you've done can alter them.

Thank you for your genuinely constructive comment, I have read about the downsides and possible pitfalls of my approach and I am confident and comfortable with what I have done, and how hard I push my engine, but I will monitor the setup closely for any issues.
 
I think you've done ok with what you've done.. Clearly done your research to push the engine as far as it will go at stock.. But by doing that your also pushing the limits of what it will handle... Personally and in my opinion, I wouldn't do it to my car... I'd rather have my orchestra playing in harmony rather that just having a loud brass section...

But I do credit your research and the work you have done with trying to help people on a budget... Theres always gonna be a downside to this when remapping is the preferred way.. So you need to take the constructive critisism on the chin...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulbul68 and phil76
I think you've done ok with what you've done.. Clearly done your research to push the engine as far as it will go at stock.. But by doing that your also pushing the limits of what it will handle... Personally and in my opinion, I wouldn't do it to my car... I'd rather have my orchestra playing in harmony rather that just having a loud brass section...

But I do credit your research and the work you have done with trying to help people on a budget... Theres always gonna be a downside to this when remapping is the preferred way.. So you need to take the constructive critisism on the chin...

Thank you, it is nice to see a positive comment because I put many hours into researching this :salute:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulbul68 and phil76
good or bad, different or indifferent, we are all here to help one another, end of the day we are all on the same team, thumbs up to anyone who uses their own time and money and passes on the rewards to others to share
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulbul68 and Adam_A3_
I had a bleed valve fitted to my Fiesta turbo back in the 90's! I nearly melted my pistons then! Make sure you log each cylinder for detonation.
 
Absolutely, worked a lot on my setup to get it just right. Im currently running 250hp with 300lb/ft at 19-20 psi. Did the diode mod (occasional limp mode at part throttle) and everything is fine, if anyone has any questions I'd be happy to answer them
 
  • Like
Reactions: sliced
its having a rebuild :undwech:
 
diode mod ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Julian smith
diode mod ?

Old mod for clamping the peak output from the MAP sensor.

Basically a means of fooling the ECU into seeing less boost than is actually being delivered.
 
Old mod for clamping the peak output from the MAP sensor.

Basically a means of fooling the ECU into seeing less boost than is actually being delivered.


oh rite so one of the ebay mapping boxes
 
oh rite so one of the ebay mapping boxes

Not even that sophisticated.

There's a few threads on it but basically inserting a diode across the output of the MAP.

I mean....good car,expensive engine,couple of cheap diodes to fool its computers ....what could be better?

Errrrr a proper remap and RR setup maybe?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rhyso, sliced, Lewbo and 1 other person
Sigh, here comes the ridicule again... do something in a different way and all you get is people taking the ****. Fact is guys the forums are full of threads from people having problems after remaps, so far everything has been fine, no melted pistons no rebuilds as predicted etc etc. If you are not interested in this thread then go and post somewhere else, and take your nuthugging girlfriends with you. I really really hate forums, deviate from the established line and you just get trashed :wtf:
 
Your attitude stinks, maybe you should leave if you cant take other peoples criticisms and opinions, that is part of the basis of a successful forum.

What you do to your car is up to you and you have published your results but when other users who work in the industry or have a lot of knowledge on these engines your getting your back up, that is not good forum practice.

Personally if I ever saw your car for sale and knew what you had done to it I would steer clear. There is a reason tuning companies have excellent experience, plenty of development time, and lots of happy customers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peaky83, Marshy, kanecullen89 and 3 others
What exactly does putting a diode across the map sensor do?

I always thought a diode is to control the 'flow' of electricity one way and not back the other (one way valve)

The mod of the early injection engines (May still work but feck trying it) was to place a resistor across the air flow meter to fool the ECU into thinking more or denser air was entering, so it increases fuelling

Am I missing something as something tells me placing a diode across the map sensor will either do 1. Nothing (if it's round the wrong way) or 2. Potentially just send a full on signal back to the ECU 24/7 with no variations
 
  • Like
Reactions: NKenny
The diode just alters the signal the ecu receives telling it what manifold pressure is.
Therefore on a turbo car allowing it to run more boost.
Very dangerous to do, as our engines need to run so lean nowadays increasing boost without the fuel to match increases combustion temperatures massively.
People do it and get away with it others aren't so lucky.
If the opp is happy with this mod and getting good results thats fine, although not something I or anyone with any mechanical knowledge woukd do.
 
I understand the principal, but still fail to see how a diode produces this... Resistor yes, diode no...
 
I haven't a clue but 1 thing I do know is if your fooling something to do summat it shouldn't be doing then it's not gonna be long before it gets fed up of being fooled and thinks **** it I've had enough!

I also reckon a quality remap would out last this mod 6x over, just take the feedback as it is just feedback. No one's slagging you or cursing you, if your happy doing what your doing then that's ok. Just don't become a keyboard warrior.
 
Interesting read and thanks for sharing your experience. Seems like you've done your research but, I'd be interested to hear how you're monitoring internal temps and what you'd be looking out for to flag up any potential issues.
 
fair play, lads happy with his car, and it hasn't blown yet
 
if this guys engine blew up I bet he wont let us know.:laugh:
I like this thread
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boon
No, my engine has not blown up, in fact everything is fine. My only issues have been from using a manual boost controller, I have been trying to get the same power with less torque, the K03 hits very hard and sometimes I have been caught out with 300lb-ft trying to propel me into the car in front. I dont mean to come across as a douche, it just annoys me that all you seem to get on forums is people saying "it cant be done" or something similar. The fact is, I probably paid a LOT less for my car than most others here. I bought the car for some low cost turbo entertainment and with the intention of modifying it myself, so in that regard it has been great. All I can say is that the BWA engine is not half as fragile as people think, and neither is the K03 (mine is now at 98k). The ECU is very good at maintaining the AF/R and it has always run perfectly even when going between different boost setups and levels. The only weaknesses I have found is it is easy to get near the limit for the hpfp in the mid range and the intercooler struggles when boost is very high, hence why I have been refining my setup to be more efficient.
 
Nice to see someone trying something different.
Best of luck and hope it goes well!

Get some pics up! :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lambster
All I can say is good luck fella with your 'experiment'. I'd be changing my oil every 3,000 miles to keep engine temps down. Enjoyed reading the thread though.
 
Also let me add that I do not drive like an idiot, around town I rarely get into boost at all, and I never give it the beans for long.

Sorry, I just can't seem to get my head around this. You've basically made your car quicker and yet you're unable to drive quicker for any amount of time?
 
No, I am saying that I made the car quicker to enjoy a quick sprint if I feel like it, I drive responsibly 99% of the time as I almost always have passengers. There are those rare moments though when I am alone and a Focus ST or a Type R pulls up next to me...
 
I just thought I would add a little information on the zener diode mod in case anyone is interested. One of the functions of the MAP sensor on this engine is to ensure that the manifold pressure is within specification, basically it compares the actual pressure with the pressure the ECU is expecting. If the signal (boost) is too high the car will go into limp mode and may throw an overboost code (but mine never has). The signal ranges from about 1.8v to 5v which corresponds to manifold pressure. A zener diode will "cap" this voltage signal so the ECU will still believe boost is within spec when it is now in fact higher.The effect of this is that there are no more overboost codes or limp modes to contend with. Fuel is not a concern as long as you are sensible, because the ECU uses the MAF sensor instead of the MAP sensor to calculate the fuel required. If you do end up boosting too high (over 22psi) or get too close to the maximum the hpfp can flow, you will run into fuel cut which will protect the engine from going lean.
 
I just thought I would add a little information on the zener diode mod in case anyone is interested. One of the functions of the MAP sensor on this engine is to ensure that the manifold pressure is within specification, basically it compares the actual pressure with the pressure the ECU is expecting. If the signal (boost) is too high the car will go into limp mode and may throw an overboost code (but mine never has). The signal ranges from about 1.8v to 5v which corresponds to manifold pressure. A zener diode will "cap" this voltage signal so the ECU will still believe boost is within spec when it is now in fact higher.The effect of this is that there are no more overboost codes or limp modes to contend with. Fuel is not a concern as long as you are sensible, because the ECU uses the MAF sensor instead of the MAP sensor to calculate the fuel required. If you do end up boosting too high (over 22psi) or get too close to the maximum the hpfp can flow, you will run into fuel cut which will protect the engine from going lean.

One possible consideration here is that whilst the car does use the MAF as it's primary air metering sensor,it will default to using the MAP sensor if there are any issues with the MAF,such as dirt etc interfering with it's function.
 
The signal ranges from about 1.8v to 5v which corresponds to manifold pressure. A zener diode will "cap" this voltage signal so the ECU will still believe boost is within spec when it is now in fact higher.The effect of this is that there are no more overboost codes or limp modes to contend with.


I can't comment on the concept behind the mod but I can say that the electronic solution looks sound.
 
Problem with most forums is they are "sponsored" by Revo etc and therefore if anyone releases a guide of how to get power without a remap, either the thread gets binned and the guy gets banned or thousands of "insert tuning company here" fans get involved....

I am glad it is working for you flexiblemouse :)

Personally I would have a company remap my car. Why? Liability. If they mess up it is their fault. That simple. Buy a £10k car what is £300 for a remap ?