Just giving the police an excuse to pull you over for a chat. Especially those who tint front lights. No doubt if you get stopped and asked to remove it it will be all the fault of the police and not the fact that lights are there for safety not to just look pretty. By all means for shows and the like. Even replacing them with clear lenses or HIDs but obstructing ANY light source for the means of vanity is just daft. If your insurance was to note that in a crash you tinted lights they would/could use that as a get out of paying up. Not to mention where front lights have the fly eye tint. You lose a lot of the lumen output as you cover the lense in some way or another. Just as daft as front dark window tints. Just my opinion I suppose but backed up by legislation too.
MOT guide as of 2012
Inoperative or less than 50% of the light
sources illuminating
Obscured so that less than 50% of the lamp
illuminating surface is visible from the front
or rear as appropriate
Not visible from a reasonable distance due
to excessive damage, deterioration, or
having products on the lens or light source
Shows a light other than red to the rear and
white to the front (or yellow if a front
position lamp is incorporated in a yellow
headlamp)
Adversely affected by the operation of any
other lamp, e.g. dual-function lamps on
foreign vehicles.
Well I never thought......