its not offensive to all women...rug munchers would love that sig!
Staz, we know why you removed it, but we dont agree with why you removed it.
Just my thoughts but you seem a bit different now, with your school teacher hat on lol
To carry on the conversation as has been above just shows that you don't care about anyone's opinion.
My view is that KatieKatie is a troll.
All posts have been intended to wind ppl up.
I bet He/She is ******* his/herself right now.
Therefore I beleive there was no need to remove the signature.
Thank me if you agree. Surely enough thanks should equate to Staz being able to reinstate his signature?
Now worries auroan, it's the techie built into me !
Directory listing on....looks like you had a nasty car crash or rebuild ?
My view is that KatieKatie is a troll.
All posts have been intended to wind ppl up.
I bet He/She is ******* his/herself right now.
Therefore I beleive there was no need to remove the signature.
Thank me if you agree. Surely enough thanks should equate to Staz being able to reinstate his signature?
she has a 30k a5
We are so disagreeing today mate, but I respectively disagree, I do care about others opinions I really do, its just who said we have to agree with them.
But I will give you that, thanks for letting us express our views & opinions on this matter.
Staz, youve changed. LoL!!
Its just typical Political correctness. Forget all the other b0ll0cks in the rest of this meaningless thread.
I really should have been born in Aus. By now i'd be in the bar at lunchtime, downing fosters through my cork filled hat, slapping some Sheila's ****, before going back to work - wrestling Crocs out of ppls houses etc.
Its just typical Political correctness. Forget all the other b0ll0cks in the rest of this meaningless thread.
My 2 pence worth...if you're of such a gentle disposition as to be offended by 2 people kissing then you should turn your internet off, close the curtains, and take an overdose because there's a lot more offensive things than that, everywhere you look.
'certain' people are offended by two grown women kissing, why?
would these people be offended if it was two men? or
would these people be offended if it was a man and woman?
or are they just homeophobic narrow minded introverts?
irrelevent!
we dont live in a country with state imposed censorship,
so unless it is against the law, who is anyone to tell anyone else what
they should or shouldnt have in their signature!
quite pathetic really!
and just for the record staz, i loved the pic, and have saved it,
so that i can publish it all over the web!!!
the question is mate would you be offended if it was 2 men id find it imposible if your not ..thats iff your not gay if you are then fine
If you had a daughter and she saw you on the site and said.... "daddy, why are you looking at two women sticking their tongues in each others mouths? Can I also do that in public when I'm older???"
the question is mate would you be offended if it was 2 men id find it imposible if your not ..thats iff your not gay if you are then fine
I found KatieKatie's objection offensive, bigoted and slightly mysoginistic.
What was offensive about it. Two girls kissing ? Or two girls having fun ? Does KatieKatie find lesbianism offensive ? If so she is a bigot. Does she find men looking at images of two girls kissing offensive ? If so she is an ignorant bigot. Those girls in your sig were behaving freely and were not under duress - to find that image offensive is to find women's freedom offensive.
You're an intelligent man Staz and you know what I'm saying. Her reaction had no thought behind it at all. It was a case of "I should be offended by that so I will be" and so she lodged a complaint.
It was a mean-spirited, bigoted, slightly discriminatory, possibly mysoginistic and petty act which I would not have thought this site would support. KatieKatie appears to hate women and hate women's freedom to act as they wish. Not nice.
There goes another bigot