AUDI A4 B6 or B7 which is the best looking?

[CHEZ]

Pfft Chez thats cheating

well i dont think so!
if i had told a metro 6R4 owner he had an mg metro then, yes i see your point, as the engine is in the back etc of a 6R4, and a totally different car, where as the RS4 is, well, a B7!
now i could not tell the RS4 owner he has a B6 now could i mr V?

 

[CHEZ]

anyways, COME ON B7 LOVERS...........get voting, we are losing......

 

[voorhees]

now i could not tell the RS4 owner he has a B6 now could i mr V?

No,you could not chez could you.

 

[quattrojames]

Nice RS4 in your sig Chez.

 

[CHEZ]

Nice RS4 in your sig Chez.

it is just a diesel estate car mate, that is all! not a hyper car! (the best shape though) B7 FTW

 

[quattrojames]

Let the voters decide

 

[crazy88]

I'd be more inclined to let you off with an S4 comparison, since bodywise there's only really the bumpers which are different, but the RS4 has flared arches, therefore looks more badass, and naturally looks great. But you can't compare an RS4 to an A4, you're being silly if you try.

Afterall, the B7 and B6 share the same chassis, so where does the common ground end? Anyway, close the poll now, you're clearly losing!

 

[CHEZ]

close the poll now, you're clearly losing!

no way jose!
i could have requested a mod to close the poll when the B7 lot were winning but i never!
i think 2 weeks, will see peaks and troughs to give a final accurate result imo!
hang in there big fella!

 

[CHEZ]

I'd be more inclined to let you off with an S4 comparison, since bodywise there's only really the bumpers which are different, but the RS4 has flared arches, therefore looks more badass,

plus better seats and wheels and brakes and suspension and is a B7 therefore looks better! hence the thread!

 

[quattrojames]

i think 2 weeks, will see peaks and troughs to give a final accurate result imo!

The peaks being the B6, and troughs being the B7?

 

[CHEZ]

The peaks being the B6, and troughs being the B7?

yes james, only for now

 

[crazy88]

plus better seats and wheels and brakes and suspension and is a B7 therefore looks better! hence the thread!

I clearly said bodywise! And then excluded bumpers etc.

And well done on finally being able to quote properly. It's a good day for you...apart from the poll results.

 

[CHEZ]

I clearly said bodywise! And then excluded bumpers etc.

And well done on finally being able to quote properly. It's a good day for you...apart from the poll results.

and now you are just nit picking, mr square car!

 

[crazy88]

This is a great looking b7!!!

Oh no, wait a minute! It's a horrendous nose placed on a lovely looking b6 to make it look just like a b7. I imagine you're allover that car chez. You'll be selling your b6.5 to get one!

 

[CHEZ]

This is a great looking b7!!!

Oh no, wait a minute! It's a horrendous nose placed on a lovely looking b6 to make it look just like a b7. I imagine you're allover that car chez. You'll be selling your b6.5 to get one!

no paul, that is underpants, inferior, a pretender! but as they say, imitation is the highest form of flattery, but i own a real one so fair play to the dreamers!

 

[crazy88]

To be fair though, now you've quoted that pic and I can compare it to the shed in your signature I realise even more so how awful that front end is on a b7. You have wonkier lights and that's about it.

 

[CHEZ]

To be fair though, now you've quoted that pic and I can compare it to the shed in your signature I realise even more so how awful that front end is on a b7. You have wonkier lights and that's about it.

and the fact my headlights are not sunk in like pi5s holes in the snow too!

 

[crazy88]

But that's the thing, they are! Your grill area extends forwards just like that horrible kit I posted. You're like a mother with baby goggles.

 

[CHEZ]

that is because it is aerodynamically more efficient and sleeker than your barn door paul!

 

[crazy88]

that is because it is aerodynamically more efficient and sleeker than your barn door paul!

Are you sure on that, or just making wild claims? I need to see proof before I can accept that as a legitimate reason for an ugly car.

 

[CHEZ]

Are you sure on that, or just making wild claims? I need to see proof before I can accept that as a legitimate reason for an ugly car.[/QUOTE

to the technically minded yes, but i shall just google it to confirm

 

[CHEZ]

and here it is,

bodywork
body type	4/5 seater sedan/saloon
number of doors	4
designer
dimensions & weights
	mm	inches
wheelbase	2650	104.3
track/tread (front)	1528	60.2
track/tread (rear)	1526	60.1
length	4548	179.1
width	1772	69.8
height	1428	56.2
ground clearance
length:wheelbase ratio	1.72
kerb weight	1395 kg	3075 lb
weight distribution
fuel tank capacity	70 litres	15.4 UK Gal	18.5 US Gal
aerodynamics
drag coefficient	0.300
frontal area	2.14 m²
cda	0.64
engine
engine type	turbocharged petrol
engine manufacturer	Volkswagen
engine code
cylinders	Straight 4
capacity	1.8 litre 1781 cc (108.683 cu in)
bore × stroke	81 × 86.4 mm 3.19 × 3.4 in
bore/stroke ratio	0.94
valve gear	DOHC 5 valves per cylinder 20 Total valves
maximum power output	189.6 PS (187 bhp) (139.4 kW) at 5700 rpm
specific output	105 bhp/litre 1.72 bhp/cu in
maximum torque	240 Nm (177 ft·lb) (24.5 kgm) at 1950-4700 rpm
specific torque	134.76 Nm/litre 1.63 ft·lb/cu[SUP]3[/SUP]
engine construction
sump
compression ratio	9.3:1
fuel system	SFi
bmep (brake mean effective pressure)	1693.4 kPa (245.6 psi)
maximum rpm
crankshaft bearings
engine coolant	Water
unitary capacity	445.25 cc
aspiration	Turbo
compressor
intercooler	Y
catalytic converter	Y
performance
acceleration 0-80km/h (50mph)
acceleration 0-60mph
acceleration 0-100km/h	8.20 s
acceleration 0-160km/h (100mph)
standing quarter-mile
standing kilometre
maximum speed	236 km/h (147 mph)
power-to-weight ratio	134.05 bhp/ton
fuel consumption
fuel consumption	11.8/6.7/8.6 l/100km urban/extra-urban/combined
carbon dioxide emissions	206 g/km
carfolio calculated co[SUB]2[/SUB] [SUP]?[/SUP]
chassis
engine position	front
engine layout	longitudinal
drive wheels	front wheel drive
torque split	N/A
steering	rack & pinion PAS
turns lock-to-lock
turning circle	11.10 m
front suspension	I.4Li.U&LW.ARB.
rear suspension	I.TzLi.ARB.
wheel size front
wheel size rear
tyres front	205/55 R 16
tyres rear	205/55 R 16
brakes f/r	VeDi/Di-S-ABS
front brake diameter
rear brake diameter
gearbox	6 speed manual
top gear ratio	0.83
final drive ratio	3.88
general
carfolio.com id	112079
production total
model code
model family	B6
rac rating	16.3
insurance classification	No information available
tax band	No information available
2002 Audi A4 1.8 T added 2003-07-29. Last modified 2013-02-28.

2002 Audi A4 1.8 T B6 data

• bodywork
• dimensions & weights
• aerodynamics
• engine
• performance
• fuel consumption
• chassis
• general
• Abbreviations

Reminder:Using this content requires that you credit Carfolio.com as the source.




and the B7

bodywork
body type	4/5 seater sedan/saloon
number of doors	4
designer
dimensions & weights
	mm	inches
wheelbase	2642	104
track/tread (front)	1519	59.8
track/tread (rear)	1514	59.6
length	4586	180.6
width	1772	69.8
height	1427	56.2
ground clearance
length:wheelbase ratio	1.74
kerb weight	1455 kg	3208 lb
weight distribution
fuel tank capacity	70 litres	15.4 UK Gal	18.5 US Gal
aerodynamics
drag coefficient	0.330
frontal area	2.14 m²
cda	0.71
engine
engine type	turbocharged petrol
engine manufacturer	Audi
engine code
cylinders	Straight 4
capacity	2 litre 1984 cc (121.071 cu in)
bore × stroke	82.5 × 92.8 mm 3.25 × 3.65 in
bore/stroke ratio	0.89
valve gear	DOHC 4 valves per cylinder 16 Total valves
maximum power output	220 PS (217 bhp) (161.8 kW) at 5900-6100 rpm
specific output	109.4 bhp/litre 1.79 bhp/cu in
maximum torque	300 Nm (221 ft·lb) (30.6 kgm) at 2200-4000 rpm
specific torque	151.21 Nm/litre 1.83 ft·lb/cu[SUP]3[/SUP]
engine construction
sump	wet sumped
compression ratio	10.5:1
fuel system	direct petrol injection
bmep (brake mean effective pressure)	1900.2 kPa (275.6 psi)
maximum rpm
crankshaft bearings
engine coolant	Water
unitary capacity	496 cc
aspiration	Turbo
compressor
intercooler	Y
catalytic converter	Y
performance
acceleration 0-80km/h (50mph)
acceleration 0-60mph
acceleration 0-100km/h	7.10 s
acceleration 0-160km/h (100mph)
standing quarter-mile
standing kilometre
maximum speed	247 km/h (153 mph)
power-to-weight ratio	149.14 bhp/ton
fuel consumption
fuel consumption	11.3/6.2/8.1 l/100km urban/extra-urban/overall
carbon dioxide emissions	194 g/km
carfolio calculated co[SUB]2[/SUB] [SUP]?[/SUP]
chassis
engine position	front
engine layout	longitudinal
drive wheels	front wheel drive
torque split	N/A
steering	rack & pinion PAS
turns lock-to-lock
turning circle
front suspension	I.4Li.U&LW.ARB.
rear suspension	I.TzLi.ARB.
wheel size front	7J x 16
wheel size rear	7J x 16
tyres front	215/55 R 16 Y
tyres rear	215/55 R 16 Y
brakes f/r	VeDi/Di-S-ABS
front brake diameter
rear brake diameter
gearbox	6 speed manual
top gear ratio	0.73
final drive ratio	3.75
general
carfolio.com id	137181
production total
model code
model family	B7
rac rating	16.9
insurance classification	No information available
tax band	No information available
2005 Audi A4 2.0 TFSI added 2006-01-15. Last modified 2013-02-28.

2005 Audi A4 2.0 TFSI B7 data

• bodywork
• dimensions & weights
• aerodynamics
• engine
• performance
• fuel consumption
• chassis
• general
• Abbreviations

Reminder:Using this content requires that you credit Carfolio.com as the source.
Please use the following link and anchor text:
2005 Audi A4 2.0 TFSI


​

Log inUsername: Password:

Register here​

• Car specs A-Z
• Articles
• Stable (0)
• Search: Options
• Feedback

World Car Specifications

• 
  [*=center]Home
  [*=center]Specifications by marqu

Please use the following link and anchor text:
2002 Audi

 

[A4_MaJiK]

But that's an rs4, different car completely.

That said, your b7 does look good from that angle!

Not sure if this was aimed at me or not but its not an RS4 or an S4...just a normal A4.

That said, your b7 does look good from that angle!

I agree,but if you get the side and front angle,it gives off the long nose impression and them lights (shape)
each to there own. Some guys love the b7,nothing wrong that
just the majority prefere the b6 shape.

 

[jdp1962]

and here it is,

bodywork
body type	4/5 seater sedan/saloon
number of doors	4
designer
dimensions & weights
	mm	inches
wheelbase	2650	104.3
track/tread (front)	1528	60.2
track/tread (rear)	1526	60.1
length	4548	179.1
width	1772	69.8
height	1428	56.2
ground clearance
length:wheelbase ratio	1.72
kerb weight	1395 kg	3075 lb
weight distribution
fuel tank capacity	70 litres	15.4 UK Gal	18.5 US Gal
aerodynamics
drag coefficient	0.300
frontal area	2.14 m²
cda	0.64
engine
engine type	turbocharged petrol
engine manufacturer	Volkswagen
engine code
cylinders	Straight 4
capacity	1.8 litre 1781 cc (108.683 cu in)
bore × stroke	81 × 86.4 mm 3.19 × 3.4 in
bore/stroke ratio	0.94
valve gear	DOHC 5 valves per cylinder 20 Total valves
maximum power output	189.6 PS (187 bhp) (139.4 kW) at 5700 rpm
specific output	105 bhp/litre 1.72 bhp/cu in
maximum torque	240 Nm (177 ft·lb) (24.5 kgm) at 1950-4700 rpm
specific torque	134.76 Nm/litre 1.63 ft·lb/cu[SUP]3[/SUP]
engine construction
sump
compression ratio	9.3:1
fuel system	SFi
bmep (brake mean effective pressure)	1693.4 kPa (245.6 psi)
maximum rpm
crankshaft bearings
engine coolant	Water
unitary capacity	445.25 cc
aspiration	Turbo
compressor
intercooler	Y
catalytic converter	Y
performance
acceleration 0-80km/h (50mph)
acceleration 0-60mph
acceleration 0-100km/h	8.20 s
acceleration 0-160km/h (100mph)
standing quarter-mile
standing kilometre
maximum speed	236 km/h (147 mph)
power-to-weight ratio	134.05 bhp/ton
fuel consumption
fuel consumption	11.8/6.7/8.6 l/100km urban/extra-urban/combined
carbon dioxide emissions	206 g/km
carfolio calculated co[SUB]2[/SUB] [SUP]?[/SUP]
chassis
engine position	front
engine layout	longitudinal
drive wheels	front wheel drive
torque split	N/A
steering	rack & pinion PAS
turns lock-to-lock
turning circle	11.10 m
front suspension	I.4Li.U&LW.ARB.
rear suspension	I.TzLi.ARB.
wheel size front
wheel size rear
tyres front	205/55 R 16
tyres rear	205/55 R 16
brakes f/r	VeDi/Di-S-ABS
front brake diameter
rear brake diameter
gearbox	6 speed manual
top gear ratio	0.83
final drive ratio	3.88
general
carfolio.com id	112079
production total
model code
model family	B6
rac rating	16.3
insurance classification	No information available
tax band	No information available
2002 Audi A4 1.8 T added 2003-07-29. Last modified 2013-02-28.

• bodywork
• dimensions & weights
• aerodynamics
• engine
• performance
• fuel consumption
• chassis
• general
• Abbreviations

Reminder:Using this content requires that you credit Carfolio.com as the source.




and the B7

bodywork
body type	4/5 seater sedan/saloon
number of doors	4
designer
dimensions & weights
	mm	inches
wheelbase	2642	104
track/tread (front)	1519	59.8
track/tread (rear)	1514	59.6
length	4586	180.6
width	1772	69.8
height	1427	56.2
ground clearance
length:wheelbase ratio	1.74
kerb weight	1455 kg	3208 lb
weight distribution
fuel tank capacity	70 litres	15.4 UK Gal	18.5 US Gal
aerodynamics
drag coefficient	0.330
frontal area	2.14 m²
cda	0.71
engine
engine type	turbocharged petrol
engine manufacturer	Audi
engine code
cylinders	Straight 4
capacity	2 litre 1984 cc (121.071 cu in)
bore × stroke	82.5 × 92.8 mm 3.25 × 3.65 in
bore/stroke ratio	0.89
valve gear	DOHC 4 valves per cylinder 16 Total valves
maximum power output	220 PS (217 bhp) (161.8 kW) at 5900-6100 rpm
specific output	109.4 bhp/litre 1.79 bhp/cu in
maximum torque	300 Nm (221 ft·lb) (30.6 kgm) at 2200-4000 rpm
specific torque	151.21 Nm/litre 1.83 ft·lb/cu[SUP]3[/SUP]
engine construction
sump	wet sumped
compression ratio	10.5:1
fuel system	direct petrol injection
bmep (brake mean effective pressure)	1900.2 kPa (275.6 psi)
maximum rpm
crankshaft bearings
engine coolant	Water
unitary capacity	496 cc
aspiration	Turbo
compressor
intercooler	Y
catalytic converter	Y
performance
acceleration 0-80km/h (50mph)
acceleration 0-60mph
acceleration 0-100km/h	7.10 s
acceleration 0-160km/h (100mph)
standing quarter-mile
standing kilometre
maximum speed	247 km/h (153 mph)
power-to-weight ratio	149.14 bhp/ton
fuel consumption
fuel consumption	11.3/6.2/8.1 l/100km urban/extra-urban/overall
carbon dioxide emissions	194 g/km
carfolio calculated co[SUB]2[/SUB] [SUP]?[/SUP]
chassis
engine position	front
engine layout	longitudinal
drive wheels	front wheel drive
torque split	N/A
steering	rack & pinion PAS
turns lock-to-lock
turning circle
front suspension	I.4Li.U&LW.ARB.
rear suspension	I.TzLi.ARB.
wheel size front	7J x 16
wheel size rear	7J x 16
tyres front	215/55 R 16 Y
tyres rear	215/55 R 16 Y
brakes f/r	VeDi/Di-S-ABS
front brake diameter
rear brake diameter
gearbox	6 speed manual
top gear ratio	0.73
final drive ratio	3.75
general
carfolio.com id	137181
production total
model code
model family	B7
rac rating	16.9
insurance classification	No information available
tax band	No information available
2005 Audi A4 2.0 TFSI added 2006-01-15. Last modified 2013-02-28.

• bodywork
• dimensions & weights
• aerodynamics
• engine
• performance
• fuel consumption
• chassis
• general
• Abbreviations

Reminder:Using this content requires that you credit Carfolio.com as the source.
Please use the following link and anchor text:
2005 Audi A4 2.0 TFSI


​

Log inUsername: Password:

Register here​

• Car specs A-Z
• Articles
• Stable (0)
• Search: Options
• Feedback

World Car Specifications

• 
  [*=center]Home
  [*=center]Specifications by marqu

Please use the following link and anchor text:
2002 Audi

CHEZ, can I just check with you that the purpose of posting these spec lists is to demonstrate that the B7 is more aerodynamic than the B6?

 

[A4_MaJiK]

CHEZ, can I just check with you that the purpose of posting these spec lists is to demonstrate that the B7 is more aerodynamic than the B6? I

Just read through it and I wanna ask the same question haha

 

[jdp1962]

Just read through it and I wanna ask the same question haha

Azeem, you bu**er! You've quoted my post before I had time to correct the typo!

 

[CHEZ]

CHEZ, can I just check with you that the purpose of posting these spec lists is to demonstrate that the B7 is more aerodynamic than the B6?

erm yeah, and according to the figures it looks like i am wrong! ha ha ha!

 

[jdp1962]

erm yeah, and according to the figures it looks like i am wrong! ha ha ha!

Ready to concede defeat, yet?

 

[CHEZ]

Ready to concede defeat, yet?

negative

 

[quattrojames]

erm yeah, and according to the figures it looks like i am wrong! ha ha ha!

Yes, with a drag coefficient of 0.30 the B6 is actually less of a...

barn door

... than the B7...

Chez, I think it's fantastic how your bumps and specs actually just add weight to the B6 argument! I admire your stubbornness, and of course an opinion is never wrong, but .....

Ready to concede defeat, yet?

.... even the B7 owners are accepting of the fact.

 

[CHEZ]

never give in......

 

[ScottD3]

Chez,
You and Rocky got a lot in common...................well one thing.

No one can understand a ****** word you are saying.

 

[crazy88]

Not sure if this was aimed at me or not but its not an RS4 or an S4...just a normal A4.

No, it was aimed at Mr-C, but your car does look nice in that pod pic...because you can't see the front end

(By the way, I jest about a lot of this stuff, so please nobody take offense. I do genuinely prefer the b6, but the b7 is by no means ugly). Right, now I can continue to slag off the b7.

 

[ScottD3]

(By the way, I jest about a lot of this stuff, so please nobody take offense. I do genuinely hate the ugly b7). Right, now I can continue to slag off the b7.

Fixed it for you.

 

[CHEZ]

Fixed it for you.

scott get back to the old square bag of hammers b5 threads will you!

 

[jdp1962]

scott get back to the old square bag of hammers b5 threads will you!

Just to throw a spanner into the works, I have to say in my view, the B5 is the best-looking A4 of all. In fact, I think each successive A4 is a little bit less well-styled than its predecessor.

 

[CHEZ]

oh, i am not saying i do not like the B5, it was merely just a dig aimed at scott with his audi 80esq burgundy thing, i love the B5 RS4
anyway, back on topic, B6 OR B7

 

[s3dave]

 

[crazy88]

Did Chez really dig that all by himself? Most impressive!

 

[CHEZ]

yes i dug that hole for myself paul!
it must be because of my coal mining heritage!