khyberpass
Registered User
Got my red a3 quattro 3 days ago..and really enjoying it. 59k on the clock, so only just bedding in
A little different to the other cars on my drive...
1. a 56 plate (new shape) 2.9 Kia Sedona LS auto - 60k on clock
2. an 05 plate citroen c2 vtr sensodrive - 62k on the clock
3. an 08 plate merc c220cdi sports auto - 92k on the clock (my daily business car!)
Not sure what I am going to do with the audi yet. It's in really good nick, so apart from a remap, and tinted windows, and possibly a little bit of body wrap ( plus possibly getting upgraded front lights with daytime running spec), it may stay "standard"....
I've had high BHP cars (rx7 at over 400bhp being the beast), but at 6sec 0-60 and 155 mph top speed, there's no real reason to put a charger on the 3.2!!!
Hopefully very few problems, and plenty of enjoyable driving to be had with my new baby in the coming months..look forward to chatting to, and meeting you in the future; especially from fellow 3.2 owners, who can tell me all about their quirks
Steve
A little different to the other cars on my drive...
1. a 56 plate (new shape) 2.9 Kia Sedona LS auto - 60k on clock
2. an 05 plate citroen c2 vtr sensodrive - 62k on the clock
3. an 08 plate merc c220cdi sports auto - 92k on the clock (my daily business car!)
Not sure what I am going to do with the audi yet. It's in really good nick, so apart from a remap, and tinted windows, and possibly a little bit of body wrap ( plus possibly getting upgraded front lights with daytime running spec), it may stay "standard"....
I've had high BHP cars (rx7 at over 400bhp being the beast), but at 6sec 0-60 and 155 mph top speed, there's no real reason to put a charger on the 3.2!!!
Hopefully very few problems, and plenty of enjoyable driving to be had with my new baby in the coming months..look forward to chatting to, and meeting you in the future; especially from fellow 3.2 owners, who can tell me all about their quirks
Steve