Chris NottSky Insurance
Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Defratos's Avatar
    You’re Dethpicable!!

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    London....Relocated to the Mid East
    Posts
    2,230

    Which suspension set-up is better?

    Hey guys, I've already posted this in the handeling section but didn't get many replies. Do u guys have any comments:

    I've heard some one on here say that this is probably the best set-up for an S3:

    H&R Springs
    Blistein dampers
    Forge adjustable arms
    Nuespeed ARBs

    Now, what about:

    Koni coil-over setup (fully adjustable, height and damper adjustment)
    Forge adjustable arms
    and Nuespeed ARBS (front and rear)

    any comments? I know the ride is supposed to be a bit more harsh, but does it handel that lil bit better on the track?

  2. # ADS
    ADS
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Global
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2
    Ess_Three's Avatar
    Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Aberdeenshire
    Posts
    5,385

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    [ QUOTE ]
    Now, what about:

    Koni coil-over setup (fully adjustable, height and damper adjustment)
    Forge adjustable arms
    and Nuespeed ARBS (front and rear)

    any comments? I know the ride is supposed to be a bit more harsh, but does it handel that lil bit better on the track?

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Forge or Milltek (do they still make them?) adjustable arms will do the same job.

    Neuspeed ARBs just work...but so may H&R or Eibach...who knows!

    Koni coilovers are fine...I have them on my GTI.
    But, they are noisy and harsh...probably more so than the H&R / Bilstein combo, but I can't say for sure as I never tried them.

    The set up you originally mentioned was a ROAD set up...it's perfect for ROAD use.

    For track use, it could do with stiffer rear springs and dampers, and the ability to play with the damping.

    So, in answer to your question, using Koni coilovers will be fine. Overkill for the road...but probably ultimately better on the track...but who knows...it may not be.

  4. #3
    Ess_Three's Avatar
    Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Aberdeenshire
    Posts
    5,385

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    Just remember...there is no perfect right and wrong with suspension...it's all down to driving ability and perception.

    Any upgrade will be better than stock...but after that, it's all about component choice and set-up

    A perfect setting for me may be awful for you.

    All the best bits badly set up will be a waste and awful to drive...

    Standard stuff well set up will be better than cheap upgrades badly set up.

    You pay your money, and take your choice.

    Personally, If I were spending Ł1200+ on a complete set-up...I'd want one that just works, straight out of the box.
    Hence, my preference for suggesting the H&R/Bilstein/Forge/Neuspeed combo.

  5. #4
    Defratos's Avatar
    You’re Dethpicable!!

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    London....Relocated to the Mid East
    Posts
    2,230

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    Ah, I understand. Ok but is the H&R or Blistein at all adjustable? or you can't damper adjust it? I would agree with you on the fact that Koni is harsh ride, but I don't have anything to compare it with.

  6. #5
    Ess_Three's Avatar
    Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Aberdeenshire
    Posts
    5,385

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    [ QUOTE ]
    Ah, I understand. Ok but is the H&R or Blistein at all adjustable? or you can't damper adjust it?


    [/ QUOTE ]

    The Bilstein damping is fixed...and to be honest...there is absolutely no need to change it...it's PERFECT for a fast-road S3.

    It just works...


    [ QUOTE ]

    I would agree with you on the fact that Koni is harsh ride, but I don't have anything to compare it with.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Konis tend to be harsher, in my experience...
    Coilovers also tend to be both noiseier and harsher in my experience...

    As to whether you would need to adjust the damping...or whether there is a need to have anything other than the proven Bilstein damping is a matter for debate.

    I never tracked my S3...
    But I presumed that in order to get the car doing what I wanted on the track ,I would need to go harder on the rear damping...

    But, David - who bought my S3 - does trackdays like a man possessed...and swears that there is no need for stiffer rear damping...or front for that matter.

    Perhaps, if the track preformance is your priority, you should contact David R for his thoughts - assuming he doesn't read this and post here.
    He'll be much better placed to comment on the on-track performance of the H&R/Bilstein/Forge/Neuspeed set up...

  7. #6
    Defratos's Avatar
    You’re Dethpicable!!

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    London....Relocated to the Mid East
    Posts
    2,230

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    Interesting. I wouldn't know from experience because I haven't taken mine to the track yet, but I think I'm slowley being won over by the blistien, because at the end of the day I would like a nicer all round ride, and for the days that I do take it to track, well, I guess I'll just see what others say, might even pm David R. Cheers for the help Glen, [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beerchug.gif[/img]

  8. #7
    jojo's Avatar
    S3 Drift King!

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Solihull, Midlands
    Posts
    25,566

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    Glen (Ess Three), whats your take on uprating the rear ARB on an S3 as a cheap handling mod? eg. 16mm from V6 4motion or 19mm from R32, but retaining the standard front item(19mm?).
    Of course I know it will be cheaper in the long run to get the full works done at once with changing the springs,shocks and ARBs all at once, but I get satisfaction from doing things step by step... [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/ok.gif[/img]

  9. #8
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Billericay, UK
    Posts
    278

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    This should reduce understeer (according to a recent tuning article I read anyway...)

    Will be interested to read other opinions.

    Greg

  10. #9
    Defratos's Avatar
    You’re Dethpicable!!

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    London....Relocated to the Mid East
    Posts
    2,230

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    I wouldn't got for a V6 4motion's anti-roll bar, as standard they're pretty bad, the Nuespeed ARBs seem to be the best quality

  11. #10
    Ess_Three's Avatar
    Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Aberdeenshire
    Posts
    5,385

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    [ QUOTE ]
    Glen (Ess Three), whats your take on uprating the rear ARB on an S3 as a cheap handling mod? eg. 16mm from V6 4motion or 19mm from R32, but retaining the standard front item(19mm?).


    [/ QUOTE ]

    Hard to say...it should work, but I never tried it...

    The problem is that the S3s ARBs in general are too soft...so even though you fit a large rear bar, to reduce understeer - which it will - you will still roll at the front, roll off the edge of the tyre / run out of ideas on standard damping, and understeer anyway.

    Uprated dampers, with a std F ARB and R32 R ARB may work...

    But then there the usual concerns of fitting a large rear ARB on standard rear damping, and the 'unloading' of the rear ARB at awkward times...not something I'd be keen to suggest.

    But, the Neuspeed combo works incredibly well...not cheap...but it just works.


    [ QUOTE ]

    Of course I know it will be cheaper in the long run to get the full works done at once with changing the springs,shocks and ARBs all at once, but I get satisfaction from doing things step by step... [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/ok.gif[/img]

    [/ QUOTE ]

    I understand...

    My view:

    Tyre pressures first...

    Then springs / dampers...
    You can get away with lowered springs on standard dampers if the car is new and the dampers are in good order...but it's not nice at the limit...not something I'd do again.
    Ideally springs and dampers next.

    Then play with suspension geometry...rear tie bars, front camber etc
    Waiting will wear the insides of the rear tyres though, if you are quite low (more than -20mm)

    Then ARBs


    It's up to you how you go though...

  12. #11
    nervus's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,159

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    I thought that every time you swapped springs, then dampers etc etc you would need a 4-wheel alignment done and @ >Ł120 a time i think i would only want to shell once.

  13. #12
    Ess_Three's Avatar
    Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Aberdeenshire
    Posts
    5,385

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    True...but it's still a way of doing it that avoids spending Ł7-900 in one go.

    Horses for courses etc...

  14. #13
    Defratos's Avatar
    You’re Dethpicable!!

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    London....Relocated to the Mid East
    Posts
    2,230

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    Dunc, would you go as far as to change the Knoi's over lets say Blistein dampers? for a smoother ride? or have u personally gotten used to the ride feel? My bro has the Koni set-up so I kinda know how the ride feels but nothin to compare it with.

  15. #14
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    289

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    well I havent driven a car wih Bilsteins to be able to compare.

    I have driven cars with KW coilovers and H&R Comfort coilovers and they are much better (softer) but its down to money at the end of the day - maybe one day...

    Dunc

  16. #15
    Defratos's Avatar
    You’re Dethpicable!!

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    London....Relocated to the Mid East
    Posts
    2,230

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    Why which ones are more expensive? aren't the Koni's more?

  17. #16
    sssgucci's Avatar
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    98

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    IMO the H+R's are defineatly better than koni. I used to have koni's on my old mk2 golf 16v.

    KW are good too but they corrode big time!

    H+R are original factory equipment on golf R32's.(cup kit)
    I later found this out after a "R" kind of di*ked all over me around two roundabouts!

    I blitzed him on the straight though, I hope he saw the CL badge [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/goofy.gif[/img]

  18. #17
    Defratos's Avatar
    You’re Dethpicable!!

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    London....Relocated to the Mid East
    Posts
    2,230

    Re: Which suspension set-up is better?

    you're talking about the H&R springs? not the coilover kit?

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO

Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO