Volks AutosMonster Motorsport
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: S3 vs TT

  1. #1
    imported_hornet_basher
    Guest

    S3 vs TT

    I've got a 210 2001 S3 which we are thinking of changing.

    A 225 TT is on the top of the list .

    So how do the cars compare, which cars better at what and how/

    cheers

    [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

  2. # ADS
    ADS
     
  3. #2
    scoTTy's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    1,957

    Re: S3 vs TT

    I had a APR'ed TT and ran on a few track days with APR'ed S3s. There was nothing in it. In fact I was on OEM brakes and some of them had aftermarkets ones. If they had better handling then it wasn't utilised.

    TT is still a current shape so residuals are probably stronger but a new one will be about in 12-18months.

    S3 is a bit more pratical due to it being a real 3 seater.

    I went for the TT as when I bought it, I knew depreciation would be low, it was rare (yeah was!) and I love the interior.

    Some people say style over substance but since it has the same substance as an S3 it's actually style AND substance.

    I guess it's all down to what suits you and your lifestyle.

  4. #3
    imported_RAJ20VT
    Guest

    Re: S3 vs TT

    morning , you say your thinking of a tt i was think of getting an s3 do you want to swap? . call me for details if you wish 07966 848440

  5. #4
    imported_fingermouse
    Guest

    Re: S3 vs TT

    [ QUOTE ]
    The lack of visibility in the TT would p*ss me off after a while. As far as performance I dont think there is much in it? S3 a bit heavier maybe?

    [/ QUOTE ]

    actually I think the TT is slightly heavier [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/book.gif[/img]

  6. #5
    The Slug's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,853

    Re: S3 vs TT



    actually I think the TT is slightly heavier [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/book.gif[/img]

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Correct TT is quite a bit heavier, ever tried jacking the front end up, lol

  7. #6
    Defratos's Avatar
    Youre Dethpicable!!

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    London....Relocated to the Mid East
    Posts
    2,230

    Re: S3 vs TT

    that's weird I would have thought the S3 is heavier. The S3 standard is like 1500KG right? anyone know how much the TT is?

  8. #7
    RacingTeatray's Avatar
    Freezing in Moscow

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Moscow
    Posts
    244

    Re: S3 vs TT

    S3 weighs around 1375-1400kgs I think whereas TT weighs in at approx 1500kgs.

  9. #8
    Reverse Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    DERBYSHIRE
    Posts
    3

    Re: S3 vs TT

    HEY, I WORK FOR AUDI AND HAVE NOT LONG RECENTLY BOUGHT A 2001 S3, I TEST DROVE BOTH AND DRIVE THEM ON A REGULAR BASIS WITH WORK. FOR ME THE S3 WON HANDS DOWN IT WAS MORE PRACTIAL AS SAID ALREADY BUT THE SPEED DIFFERENCE IS MINIMAL BUT THE ROAD HOLDING WAS BETTER THANKS TO THAT EXTRA WEIGHT. AS FAR AS STYLING GOES U CANT BEAT THE LOOK OF AN S3 FOR ME AND INTERIOR? WITH ALCANTARA SPLIT LEATHER RECAROS AND SAT NAV WHAT MORE COULD U WANT???!!! PUT A CHIP ON IT AND AN EXHAUST!!

  10. #9
    scoTTy's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    1,957

    Re: S3 vs TT

    Can you SPEAK UP a bit? I'm a bit deaf. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

  11. #10
    Ess_Three's Avatar
    Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Aberdeenshire
    Posts
    5,385

    Re: S3 vs TT

    [ QUOTE ]

    gives mine loads more mid and top end , very worth while imo

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Dyno proven?

    I had my Milltek tested before and after...both the exhaust system and cats...
    I got nothing from either...nothing provable by a dyno plot anyway.

    I admit that the car 'felt' faster...and seemed to pull better at the top end...but no extra power.

    Certainly nothing like the claims of the manufacturer.
    This was on a standard S3...

    Was it worth it?
    For noise, looks and 'feel',,,probably.
    For power gain...no.
    Neither are the cats...IMHO.


    However...when running high boost, better ICs, modified inlet etc...I guess you would see some form of gain.

  12. #11
    scoTTy's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    1,957

    Re: S3 vs TT

    Apart from the sound the best thing I found it did was to allow the car to rev freely for an additional 500-750 rpm before it started running out of accelaration.

    That made it much more flexible and on it's own for me made it worthwhile.

  13. #12
    scoTTy's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    1,957

    Re: S3 vs TT

    The cats for the 1.8T don't seem to be worth it unless you're pushing for 300bhp or more.

  14. #13
    Ess_Three's Avatar
    Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Aberdeenshire
    Posts
    5,385

    Re: S3 vs TT

    [ QUOTE ]
    The cats for the 1.8T don't seem to be worth it unless you're pushing for 300bhp or more.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Couldn't have said it any better, scoTTy.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO

Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO