Chris NottMonster Motorsport
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 49 of 49
  1. #41
    jojo's Avatar
    S3 Drift King!

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Solihull, Midlands
    Posts
    25,439
    Quote Originally Posted by NHN View Post


    You sure as I read it was fwd joey.
    I'm pretty sure VW have marketed the Scirocco R as the fwd model and the Golf R as the 4wd with the same engine, I shall go home after work and check now!



    99' Audi S3(APY) - Brilliant Black Click>>>Going Sideways vid!
    You've got to have a laugh! For Sale:LCR Brakes - ÂŁ400



  2. # ADS
    ADS
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Global
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #42
    NHN
    NHN's Avatar
    Modmetractor

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Coding Something
    Posts
    27,033
    Nope Jo, you're correct, I must have been thinking of the Rocco R mate, sorry for doubting

    Frankfurt show: VW Golf R

    The covers have just come off the new VW Golf R in Frankfurt. Don't be fooled by its understated looks, this is one monstrously fast hot hatch.

    It's the fastest Golf ever, in fact, powered by the same 266bhp 2.0-litre turbo engine found in the Audi S3. It'll propel the four-wheel-drive Golf to 62mph in 5.5 seconds if you spec the DSG transmission, or 0.2 seconds slower if you'd prefer a manual ’box.

    That's more powerful and quicker than both the front-wheel-drive Scirocco R and indeed the old Golf R32, which had a bigger, heavier 3.2-litre V6. Emissions and economy are both hugely improved on the old R32, consumption falling from 26.4mpg to 33.2mpg, with CO2 emissions down to 199g/km from 225g/km.

    Though visual, er, enhancements over the Golf GTI remain subtle - new front and rear bumpers, LED running lights and central exhausts being the most obvious - the suspension has been lowered by 25mm while the ESP has been revised with two additional track settings.

    Because of the four-wheel-drive hardware, the Golf R weighs in around 80kg heavier than the GTI, though 35kg lighter than the R32.
    Don't expect to see many on the road: VW says it expects to sell just 500 or so Golf Rs per year, with prices starting at around Ł28,500.

    That's a few grand more expensive than the slightly more powerful but similarly quick

    OEM RETROFITS - CRUISE CONTROL - SAT NAV - BLUETOOTH - AMI - HEADLIGHT SYSTEMS

    PARKING SYSTEMS - DIAGNOSTICS - FAULT FINDING - BODYWORK - PAINTWORK

  4. #43
    Ess_Three's Avatar
    Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Aberdeenshire
    Posts
    5,385
    Quote Originally Posted by NHN View Post
    If I may stepin here & knowing nate, I think its cause he prefers the interior to the Golfs overall, the current incarnation of A3 chassis do have better interiors, but saying this, the mk6 (aka mk5.5) & scirocco share & I was pleasantly surprised in a scirocco some weeks ago, it wasnt as bad as I thought when I was in a mk6 months back, strange tbh, but the A3 range are better IMHO, but each to there own.
    Some thought the Mk5 Golf was poor...personally, the bits that mattered didn't worry me and I liked the interior.
    The A3 was undoubtedly more showy though...

    Scirocco is Eos based...so only revised Mk5.

    Mk6 is all new...and compared to my mates A3, a step up again. In my view anyway...but it should be, the A3 is getting old now compared to the Mk6 interior.
    The game moves on...


    I have to agree, the R32 was very very lacklustre when I test drove for a new car, the gti was much better/engaging & yes I know Ess why did I go for a 2.0 tdi, well I had the S3 for 7 years & the S4 for 2 & many other fair cars before, I just got fedup with pouring dough into shell etc's pockets, now I still do this but at a slower rate.
    I never liked the R32s at all...never as quick as they should have been. and that engine - although sounding great - killed the handling stone dead.
    sure, the owners will tell you that you adapt, and can drive round it. You shouldn't have to...just build the blo*dy thing to handle properly in the fiest place.

    No need to apologise or explain to me the TDI...I've been there, and know what's what...


    You would have a 4wd,thats a 1st I've ever read from you iirc, I'm sure I always read you saying you much prefer fwd given its more adventurous drive, challenge, so wouldnt fall asleep at the wheel, hence non S3 lover, lol
    This is a fallacy,...
    My 911 was a C4S...4WD.
    And I loved my S3...it was unstoppable. Not from the factory, granted...but once sorted it was brutally quick point to point...just dull as dishwater...regardless of the speed.
    I've never said I didn't like my S3...I did. I regret getting rid. But it wasn't exciting. Just efficient.
    Some cars - Mk5/Mk6 GTIs included, are fun at modest - not jail-worthy - speeds.

    Ideally, a Golf R would be as good as a Mk6 GTI - which incidentally is shockingly good to drive in my view! - but with more power and no wheelspin (so 4WD).
    If it is as engaging as a GTI, it'll be a revelation. I just can't see it though.

    Give it a month or so and I'll find out.


    Please note:
    The views expressed on Audi-Sport.net are the personal views of its contributors (including me), and not that of the Website or the Moderator/Administration team.

  5. #44
    PaulAr's Avatar
    S3 (8P)

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Tyne & Wear
    Posts
    4,047
    Quote Originally Posted by NHN View Post

    Right you asked for it, thats the 2nd time in successive days, lmao

    http://tizona.files.wordpress.com/20...ys_mankini.jpg
    Just wanted to be the first one to say it mate. (cute pic BTW)

    These threads normally end up there, just cutting to the chase as they say

    What we must not forget is that AUDI have established themselves as purveyor of premium products, and therefore AUDIs are desirable.

    Like fancy watches, Electrical goods, Designer clothes etc...., they are a premium products, so people want them.
    Thats why some chose AUDI over the equivelent VW. Or VW over SEAT/SKODA.

    We can analyse to death the virtues of each sub brand, residuals v List price, dynamics, styling etc...but at the end of the day its how the overall package makes you `feel`.

    That why the general consensus here (remember this is an AUDI enthusiast site) is that the Golf is too much money.
    That said, many would say the S3 is expensive too but thats not any great relevation and doesnt really make for interesting threads anyway.


    Its why you rarely see threads about how rubbish CTRs interiors are on a CTR enthusiasts site, why focus on the bad bits? Why see the glass as half empty?

    Blinkered? Nope.
    Biased? You bet.

    Amen.

    Paul
    Now:
    -MK2 Golf Gti 16V/VR6, Oak Green, Shrick, Intake, Decat, Kish Retrim, Lenso BSX..
    -BMW 335d Xdrive, Estoril Blue, fully loaded.

    Before:
    S3 (8P), Ibis, DSG, Milltek, SHARK

    BMW 320d M Sport
    S3 (8P), Sprint, REVO, H&R Springs, BBS CHs,

    Golf MK5 GTi 20TFSI - REVO Stage1, Red.
    Golf MK5 GTi 20TFSI - Std, Shadow Blue
    Civic Type `R`
    Golf MK4 GTi 18T - 200bhp, MTM ECU, Forge DV
    Golf MK3 VR6 - Cat Back
    Corrado VR6 - JAMEX
    Corrado G60 - JAMEX, BRM Charger rebuild
    etc....

  6. #45
    unkle's Avatar
    Beer God

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Leics
    Posts
    1,238
    Quote Originally Posted by david_phillips95 View Post
    I think i would pay the 40k into a savings account till 2010 then buy an RS3 when its released makes more sense to me
    The interest after tax might just buy you some floor mats...
    Volvo V50 D5 R-Design

  7. #46
    ianysm's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    1,002
    I'm inclined to agree with Ess Three here. Though it looks good on paper, unless they do some serious work with suspension setup and weight loss, its going to end up being a Volkswagen S3. Fast and safe but at the expense of driver involvment.

    I don't mind admitting, i can't afford one! Perhaps 5 years ago i could, but i chose an M3. This time i'd choose an RS4...Or another M3!
    AUTOMAP
    Mobile ECU Remapping Services

    automap.remapping@gmail.com
    www.eliteremaps.com

  8. #47
    NHN
    NHN's Avatar
    Modmetractor

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Coding Something
    Posts
    27,033
    An M3 over an RS4, you sure, I tested an M3 1 before current & wasnt that impressed tbh mate, but each to there own, got back in my S3 after & it was sublime, lol

    OEM RETROFITS - CRUISE CONTROL - SAT NAV - BLUETOOTH - AMI - HEADLIGHT SYSTEMS

    PARKING SYSTEMS - DIAGNOSTICS - FAULT FINDING - BODYWORK - PAINTWORK

  9. #48
    ianysm's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    1,002
    An M3 OR an RS4...Given the roads i drive on, probably the RS4 though!

    I've driven loads of M3's but only been out once in an RS4 though. Hmm, test drive beckons!
    AUTOMAP
    Mobile ECU Remapping Services

    automap.remapping@gmail.com
    www.eliteremaps.com

  10. #49
    ianysm's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    1,002
    M3 faster in a straight line though!!!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axb19DwhqUk
    AUTOMAP
    Mobile ECU Remapping Services

    automap.remapping@gmail.com
    www.eliteremaps.com

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO

Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO