AH FabricationsSky Insurance
Results 1 to 25 of 25
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By wesmaster

Thread: Remap vs. Tuning box

  1. #1
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    75

    Remap vs. Tuning box

    Hi All.

    I've picked up a 2005 C5 allroad with 24,000 miles on the clock and it's in pretty much mint condition. It's a 2.5 TDI Tiptronic and with so few miles i think the engine/gearbox should be able to handle a little more power.

    I've always understood that a remap is the best option for cars over a tuning box, however for these engines there seem to be some opinions that suggest otherwise.

    What is the general consensus re: remap vs. tuning box and if tuning box is the best option what should I go for?

    Many thanks!

  2. # ADS
    ADS
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Heath Hayes
    Posts
    956
    A remap will beat a tuning box any day, who is saying that a tuning box is better ? Nearly all tuning boxes only do one thing and thats put more fuel in. They can't increase boost pressure to burn the extra fiuel, they can't alter SOI points to increase mpg, tuning boxes are not aware of what else is going on in the engine.
    Tuning boxes are a quick easy solution to a problem but are not the best.
    The following is from three dyno runs I did on my PD130 Passat a few years ago.
    The bottom three lines are the torque grahps , top three are power.
    Red is the standard 130 program, dark blue the tuning box, light blue a Custom Code phase 1 remap.
    The tuning box was an Alpin digital tuning box and was an expensive piece of kit when new, connected on the injector harness at the back of the engine.
    You can see the tuning box gives a good kick in torque at lower RPM but the big advantage with the map was the smothness of the power delivery and this was borne out in the driving experience, also look what happens when you get to 4200 RPM the performance dies because the ECU cuts the fuelling.
    With the remap the car pulled really strongly all the way to the red line and was so much quicker as a result. Changing as 4700 rpm means you are running at higher RPM in the next gear and making more power.



    Karl.
    Karls 312bhp A4 3.0 TDI build thread http://www.audi-sport.net/vb/audi-s4...ld-thread.html

  4. #3
    s3_trev's Avatar
    3rd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    629
    Remap all day long. Tuning boxes is a bad word in my family!

    Audi S3 8P3 / REVO Stage 1 / REVO Ceramic Intake / NGK Iridium Spark Plugs / LOBA HPFP / Philips Diamond Vision 5000k Fog Light Bulbs /
    KW V3 Coilovers / Team HEKO Wind Deflectors / Bridgestone Potenza S001 92Y Tyres / Complete LED Bulb Conversion (int' + ext') / Ashtray Delete /
    TTS Engine Cover / Alpine 928r Multimedia Station (8in screen) with integrated Bluetooth, Sat Nav etc / Ross-Tech VCDS Owner.

  5. #4
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    75
    I've read a few stories on forums about remaps on these older style engines causing them to be lumpy and throw up fault codes, etc and that good tuning boxes have proved better. I think adamss24 being one reputable member who subscribes to this.

  6. #5
    3rd Gear

    Status
    Online
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    506
    There's good remaps and bad.

  7. #6
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    75
    A local fitter does DNA maps so was thinking of one of those.

  8. #7
    wesmaster's Avatar
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Oxfordshire
    Posts
    292
    Ive got a decent map on my 155 A6, which is smooth and powerful. I wouldn't recommend a tuning box myself.

  9. #8
    s3_trev's Avatar
    3rd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    629
    To be fair tuning boxes have came a long way. I think they still have a bad rep from the days were all they done was tell the brain to add more fuel, which gave you your power. If you look at the likes of DTUK, they are leaps ahead compared to the older tuning boxes. I would say that the remap is still king though as you have the option of a custom remap, which should mean the elimination of any of the lumpyness that you speak of, as its tailored to your vehicle.

    Audi S3 8P3 / REVO Stage 1 / REVO Ceramic Intake / NGK Iridium Spark Plugs / LOBA HPFP / Philips Diamond Vision 5000k Fog Light Bulbs /
    KW V3 Coilovers / Team HEKO Wind Deflectors / Bridgestone Potenza S001 92Y Tyres / Complete LED Bulb Conversion (int' + ext') / Ashtray Delete /
    TTS Engine Cover / Alpine 928r Multimedia Station (8in screen) with integrated Bluetooth, Sat Nav etc / Ross-Tech VCDS Owner.

  10. #9
    quattrojames's Avatar
    Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dorset
    Posts
    13,856

    My Social Networking

    Follow quattrojames On Twitter Add quattrojames on Facebook
    As always... "You get what you pay for".

    I had a DPT box on my 2.5q, brand new it was £400, I bought it at a year old for £100. It gave a claimed bhp jump to 210 from 180 - I never verified that, but the car was noticeably livelier with a much smoother torque curve, and in addition it gave an easy extra 2 mpg.

    If I were paying £400 I'd go for a remap, if a box came up for £100 then I wouldn't think twice about doing that again.
    Ingolstance Read about my A6 HERE.

  11. #10
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    75
    Ok so would you agree that a remap taking the car up to 200-210bhp and 35nm extra torque would be pretty safe given the low mileage of the car?

  12. #11
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by rhys084 View Post
    Ok so would you agree that a remap taking the car up to 200-210bhp and 35nm extra torque would be pretty safe given the low mileage of the car?
    Little bump RE: opinions on getting a 2.5 TDI remapped?

  13. #12
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,259
    FOR SALE:
    -Golf mk 5/audi a3 1.6 FSI fuel pump, brand new genuine part boxed + seals
    -audi a3 (1998 to 2003) genuine clutch slave cylinder to fit 1.6 engines BRAND NEW
    -Rear bush press tool to fit new rear axle bushes on Golf Mk3/4, Audi a3/S3, Seat Leon/Toledo, Skoda Octavia mk 1/2 used once

  14. #13
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by adamss24 View Post
    Sorry mate, that thread's huge!

    What's the gist of what I'm supposed to take from it? Is it a good idea or bad to remap it?

  15. #14
    wesmaster's Avatar
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Oxfordshire
    Posts
    292
    Good.
    rhys084 likes this.

  16. #15
    All-rod's Avatar
    Reverse Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by quattrojames View Post
    As always... "You get what you pay for".
    If I were paying £400 I'd go for a remap, if a box came up for £100 then I wouldn't think twice about doing that again.
    I would go by that. Good remap is custom to car while box is easy to install and remove if needed for convenience with pretty good results also if bought from reputable brand.
    Stock 02 Allroad, AKE, Tip Auto.

  17. #16
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,259
    Generic remaps are fine on a stock motor, however there are good mappers and bad mappers + modern v6 tdi respond less to mods in the tune due to limitation in pumps... I would only go to a rolling road where they give you a printout with before and after runs...
    FOR SALE:
    -Golf mk 5/audi a3 1.6 FSI fuel pump, brand new genuine part boxed + seals
    -audi a3 (1998 to 2003) genuine clutch slave cylinder to fit 1.6 engines BRAND NEW
    -Rear bush press tool to fit new rear axle bushes on Golf Mk3/4, Audi a3/S3, Seat Leon/Toledo, Skoda Octavia mk 1/2 used once

  18. #17
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    75
    The guy local to me seems good and reputable, but the only issue is he's only got a 2WD rolling road, so can't supply dyno graphs... But said he'd do a test drive with a laptop connected to i'm guessing the OBD port to assess the map.

  19. #18
    Reverse Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    20
    Have you had this done yet?

    Iam considering a re-map for my tdi.
    Any recommendations in the northwest?

  20. #19
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    30
    Remap all the way, but with the tiptronic you cannot go too wild as the V6 180 can easily exceed the torque limits hard coded into the gearbox.
    I have a map giving around 220 bhp on my manual allroad which is currently at 216000 miles, the map was done at around 110000 miles. I compared this to a Steinbauer tuning box I ran before & the map is far better. That's not to say the tuning box wasn[t good, but a tailored map blew it away. Boosts earlier, overboosts longer & doesn't decay the boost curve as the revs rise. It flies in comparison, but uses less around 10% fuel when driven sensibly.

  21. #20
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by andyt1967 View Post
    Remap all the way, but with the tiptronic you cannot go too wild as the V6 180 can easily exceed the torque limits hard coded into the gearbox.
    I have a map giving around 220 bhp on my manual allroad which is currently at 216000 miles, the map was done at around 110000 miles. I compared this to a Steinbauer tuning box I ran before & the map is far better. That's not to say the tuning box wasn[t good, but a tailored map blew it away. Boosts earlier, overboosts longer & doesn't decay the boost curve as the revs rise. It flies in comparison, but uses less around 10% fuel when driven sensibly.
    What are these "hard coded" limits?

  22. #21
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,259
    Quote Originally Posted by andyt1967 View Post
    Remap all the way, but with the tiptronic you cannot go too wild as the V6 180 can easily exceed the torque limits hard coded into the gearbox.
    I have a map giving around 220 bhp on my manual allroad which is currently at 216000 miles, the map was done at around 110000 miles. I compared this to a Steinbauer tuning box I ran before & the map is far better. That's not to say the tuning box wasn[t good, but a tailored map blew it away. Boosts earlier, overboosts longer & doesn't decay the boost curve as the revs rise. It flies in comparison, but uses less around 10% fuel when driven sensibly.
    What year is your allroad ? 220Bhp with just a remap from stock hardware is a bit far fetched, the stock gt2052v turbo is out of it's efficiency map at 1.6 Bars of boost and you need about 1.9-2 bars of boost to break 220 Bhp ! I ran a 66mm compressor wheel on my a6 in order to get 300 Bhp...that's a whole 14mm larger compressor and a gt25 turbine in order to achieve that + 80% larger nozzles, 4 Bar map sensor, ported heads, lowered CR and much more !

    Whilst a good remap will beat a good tuning, i would be aware of any generic maps who promiss the moon ! Seen waay too many maps with just driver wish and boost map increased by 10% and called custom !
    FOR SALE:
    -Golf mk 5/audi a3 1.6 FSI fuel pump, brand new genuine part boxed + seals
    -audi a3 (1998 to 2003) genuine clutch slave cylinder to fit 1.6 engines BRAND NEW
    -Rear bush press tool to fit new rear axle bushes on Golf Mk3/4, Audi a3/S3, Seat Leon/Toledo, Skoda Octavia mk 1/2 used once

  23. #22
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    30
    Hi Adam
    It is a late 2002 AKE 180 with an AJP standard replacement turbo on it.
    Well to be honest the 220 is a guess as it hasn't been rolling roaded, but it now delivers over 2.0 bar actual from 1800rpm to 4500rpm as logged on Vagcom. The boost peaks at 2.4888 bar actual at 2181rpm before dropping back from overboost. The turbo starts to spool up at 1300rpm where it gives 1.3 bar, and then sustains 2.0 plus all the way to 4500 rpm at a N75 duty cycle of around 50%.
    Capture.JPG

  24. #23
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    30
    Hi Rhys
    My remap guy tells me the auto box has a hard torque limit preset in it. If that limit is exceeded the gearbox ECU puts the engine ECU into limp mode to protect itself. It's one of the main reasons I avoided the auto. (Plus the fact that I love the reduction transfer box on my 6 speed manual box for towing & offroad use.)

    Andy...

  25. #24
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,259
    VCDS is adding 1 bar of atmosferic pressure to the one the turbo supplies, so in effect your turbo only produces 1.2 Bar of boost before being limited by fuel/smoke limiters...
    FOR SALE:
    -Golf mk 5/audi a3 1.6 FSI fuel pump, brand new genuine part boxed + seals
    -audi a3 (1998 to 2003) genuine clutch slave cylinder to fit 1.6 engines BRAND NEW
    -Rear bush press tool to fit new rear axle bushes on Golf Mk3/4, Audi a3/S3, Seat Leon/Toledo, Skoda Octavia mk 1/2 used once

  26. #25
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    30
    Boost.JPG

    Apologies guys, i added the image from the wrong map. Here is the mapped boost curve for the map. As adam correctly states, once you take the 1 bar atmospheric off the actual boost is 1.4 bar over atmospheric, up from just over 2.0 actual (or 1.0 bar boost) on the standard map, so a 15 to 20% increase in boost reasonably consistently across the range. It's not smoking at that output either. As i say it hasn't been roaded & honestly i don't really care what the top end BHP is as the car is used for towing. The important thing is the difference in torque and driveability. The map is streets ahead of the Steinbauer box i used to run, which in turn was a vast improvemnt over the stock map. So to go back to the original thread, map all the way for me.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 1st July 2013, 15:09
  2. remaping and tuning box?
    By fulton in forum General Automotive Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 3rd March 2011, 15:51
  3. Remap AND Tuning Box??
    By will89 in forum A4/A4 cabriolet/S4 forum(B6 chassis)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 8th October 2010, 11:08
  4. Remap or Tuning Box.
    By BlackQuat in forum A4/A4 cabriolet/S4 forum(B6 chassis)
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12th February 2010, 20:38
  5. Remap versus Tuning Box
    By bezza981 in forum Audi S4/A4/A4 Cab (B7 Chassis)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 19th March 2009, 23:57

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO

Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO