AH FabricationsChris Nott
Results 1 to 22 of 22
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Dubbers1

Thread: re A4 1,8T avant quattro running costs

  1. #1
    gary911's Avatar
    Reverse Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    twickenham
    Posts
    17

    re A4 1,8T avant quattro running costs

    Hi, is the A4. avant quattro 1.8t 190bhp 6 speed heavy on fuel in general driving as I have heard they can give as little as 21mpg .
    Is the car worth having remapped as its a bit dull .
    Thank you

  2. # ADS
    ADS
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Global
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2
    crazy88's Avatar
    Loving the anonymity

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    West Yorkshire
    Posts
    4,722

    Re: re A4 1,8T avant quattro running costs

    I've heard they are bad on fuel, although 21 seems a little low. I think most people get around 30mpg? I may be wrong though, as I have a 1.9tdi, so not too clued up on the 1.8t.


  4. #3
    matt1.8t's Avatar
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    70

    re A4 1,8T avant quattro running costs

    I have the same but not the Quattro and its the 163bhp option
    Mine averages 28mpg which is crap

  5. #4
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Over the rainbow
    Posts
    138
    I Bought one a month ago, Quattro 190 Sline & getting just above 30mpg.

    May remap down the line, but don't find it too slow yet!

  6. #5
    Dubbers1's Avatar
    Top Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Bedfordshire
    Posts
    216
    I can get pretty steady low 30's mpg and mine has been mapped and a couple of other bits as it is pretty grim standard but feels a lot more alive now
    Audi A4 1.8T S-Line Quattro (190) '04

    VCDS HEX-USB+CAN


  7. #6
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    cardiff
    Posts
    88
    is a 190 slightly better than a 163?

  8. #7
    matt1.8t's Avatar
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    70

    re A4 1,8T avant quattro running costs

    Power terms yes I think

  9. #8
    Dubbers1's Avatar
    Top Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Bedfordshire
    Posts
    216
    Quote Originally Posted by KevM3 View Post
    is a 190 slightly better than a 163?
    Its 27 better
    Inertiauk likes this.
    Audi A4 1.8T S-Line Quattro (190) '04

    VCDS HEX-USB+CAN


  10. #9
    AlexGSi2000's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    1,068
    Yes have it re-mapped.

    This thread makes me feel slightly better about my 2.5TDi now.

  11. #10
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Kilmarnock, Scotland
    Posts
    292
    I get a regular real world 40mpg out of my 163 Quattro sport. I think a lot of it comes down to driving style.

    Ive never had it lower than 30mpg. IMO, don't bother getting it mapped, it'll still be dog slow and it'll be less reliable

  12. #11
    bez101's Avatar
    Yorkshire & Humber Rep.

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    7,927
    Quote Originally Posted by vroomtshh View Post
    I get a regular real world 40mpg out of my 163 Quattro sport. I think a lot of it comes down to driving style.

    Ive never had it lower than 30mpg. IMO, don't bother getting it mapped, it'll still be dog slow and it'll be less reliable
    still be dog slow ?
    less reliable ?
    how do you come to that ?

  13. #12
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Kilmarnock, Scotland
    Posts
    292
    Quote Originally Posted by bez101 View Post
    still be dog slow ?
    less reliable ?
    how do you come to that ?
    pretty simple really, mine is mapped, it's still dog slow and it's less reliable

  14. #13
    bez101's Avatar
    Yorkshire & Humber Rep.

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    7,927
    Quote Originally Posted by vroomtshh View Post
    pretty simple really, mine is mapped, it's still dog slow and it's less reliable
    well in that case remaps are crap
    but what map have you got on there ?

  15. #14
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Kilmarnock, Scotland
    Posts
    292
    Quote Originally Posted by bez101 View Post
    well in that case remaps are crap
    but what map have you got on there ?
    I never said remaps were crap. I said that a map on that particular model isn't hugely worthwhile.
    ive got a fully custom stage 2 map on mine with supporting mods. And IMO, it's still not enough power for the size of the car and the Quattro drivetrain losses.

  16. #15
    bez101's Avatar
    Yorkshire & Humber Rep.

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    7,927
    Quote Originally Posted by vroomtshh View Post
    I never said remaps were crap. I said that a map on that particular model isn't hugely worthwhile.
    ive got a fully custom stage 2 map on mine with supporting mods. And IMO, it's still not enough power for the size of the car and the Quattro drivetrain losses.
    so what power are you putting out now ?
    and TQ

  17. #16
    Dubbers1's Avatar
    Top Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Bedfordshire
    Posts
    216
    Maybe thats down to the K03 turbo, the 190 has a K03s and mine feels like a totally different car and much more responsive, and no reliability issues so dont know where you're getting that generalisation from
    Audi A4 1.8T S-Line Quattro (190) '04

    VCDS HEX-USB+CAN


  18. #17
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Kilmarnock, Scotland
    Posts
    292
    I have a k03s on mine.

  19. #18
    666markyboy's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Oldham, Manchester
    Posts
    1,089
    I have the same engine in an A3 Quattro and never had more than 30 mpg out of it and thats motorway driving.... don't beleive the DIS if says your getting 40 mpg it's a very thirsty engine but has many good points,,,, it's very tunable , very strong when properly serviced and will still return reasonable mpg when thrashed but it's never going to be an ecco engine
    1999 A3 Quattro 1.8T Pics >>HERE
    2002 A4 Avant quattro 1.9 TDi

  20. #19
    chasdrury's Avatar
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sheffield, UK
    Posts
    259
    Quote Originally Posted by vroomtshh View Post
    I get a regular real world 40mpg out of my 163 Quattro sport. I think a lot of it comes down to driving style.

    Ive never had it lower than 30mpg. IMO, don't bother getting it mapped, it'll still be dog slow and it'll be less reliable
    I have a 163 Quattro, Stage 2 Remap, carbonio CAI, Milltek, Milltek CAT, Forge diverter valve etc and it's competely different to standard and much more reposnsive. Also, all that was done at approx 30k and it's now on 129600 miles - only normal wear and tear stuff has gone - crank sensor being the most recent and lots of suspension consumables - unrelated to the remap / engine work. Oh, and the blocked oil pick up but that again is nothing to do with the remap.

    I drive 2x days a week Leeds to Preston and in 60-70mph traffic easy get 40 real world (measured fill to fill). Went to london this weekend, did 32mpg over a whole tank. THat was Leeds - London and back to as far as Leicester forest east. Spritied drivng and lots of stop start in London (going south of the river). So i think not that bad overall.
    A4 2004 - 1.8TQ Limited Edition, 6 spd, Recaro Interior
    Mods - RNS-e (MK2); Rear Screens; PS2; AMI; Cruise; DIS; 18" RS6s; Carbonio CAI; Milltek CAT; Milltek CAT back Exhaust; Shark Stage 2 ReMap; RS4 RARB; HIDS; Auto Dim Rear View; RS4 Pedals, Gear Stick & Handbrake; Forge DV; Black Optics; Retro Fit Black Headlining; Retro Fit Power Folding Mirrors
    Mods to come - Memory seats; rear electric windows

  21. #20
    V6 Quatt's Avatar
    4th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    744
    I had 190 and it drank very thirsty
    Torque the Torque

  22. #21
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Derbyshire
    Posts
    306
    I have a 190 not good on fuel but a lot better than my previous Impreza then again that was over 300bhp so in my eyes the 190 feels slow but I suppose it's not really,still could do with a bit more go for a big car but I'm kinda over the fast car thing this is my stepping stone to ween me off the power then into a diesel one day and hopefully something fast just for the weekends etc

  23. #22
    I have 190 quattro and its thirsty around town. I average 260miles on a tank around town. had the non quattro previous to this and was better on fuel and in the dry a bit quicker. I would get it re-mapped as i wouldn't describe them as fast, more just adequate.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 9th July 2010, 10:12
  2. A6 Avant questions (running costs etc)
    By FactionOne in forum A6/S6/Allroad forum (C5 Chassis)
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 24th October 2008, 13:49
  3. Owners Manual for 98 A4 Avant Quattro
    By gmero in forum A4/S4 forum(B5 Chassis)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 4th March 2004, 20:36
  4. A4 avant quattro sport
    By Bryan in forum A4/S4 forum(B5 Chassis)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 14th October 2003, 07:59
  5. A4 Avant Quattro?
    By simonlewin in forum A4/S4 forum(B5 Chassis)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 30th July 2003, 21:44

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO

Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO