EM TuningChris Nott
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    A3 Newbie... Haa

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    25

    2.0 tdi - definately want one, but is the 170 THAT much better than a 140??

    Basically as said in title

    Any help much appreciated

  2. # ADS
    ADS
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Global
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2
    smudge_don's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sutton, Surrey
    Posts
    2,941
    In a word, yes

    I've had both, and the 170 is so much more responsive

    Specially in DSG format
    Currently driving a 55 plate Ford Mondeo ST. But as Arnie once said...


    I'll be back!!!

  4. #3
    N8
    N8's Avatar
    Kowalski Details

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Salford, Manchester
    Posts
    17,110

    My Social Networking

    Add N8 on Facebook Visit N8's Instagram Channel
    I've driven a 170 DSG with a bluefin, and it felt slower than my 140 DSG, map the 140 and you'll be fine! Lower insurance too!


    "Will these wheel fit my car PM's will not be replied to, do you research & use the SEARCH button"

    Detailing - Wheel Refurbishment - Shark Performance Software - VagbremTechnic Dealer - OEM Retrofitting - Remus - V-Maxx - Goodridge

  5. #4
    deano670's Avatar
    Too Much Hype

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    271
    Go for the 140 and get it mapped if you want the extra power. Save your and get what you want.

    The 170 is less than 1 second quicker than the 140 to 60mph.

  6. #5
    A3 Newbie... Haa

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    25
    is that one second slower after the remap then? or before?
    if i were to get the 140 and remap it would it then be on par or faster than the stock 170?

  7. #6
    NHN
    NHN's Avatar
    Modmetractor

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Coding Something
    Posts
    26,722
    That would depend on age of car, if its the new 140's then they fly in stock form.

    & without sounding condescending Jord, as your 1st was 140 & this is 170 it would seem more responsive with the extra 30 horses fella as your 140 was stock.

    Lower insurance would depende if you declared the map etc as that would auto add higher insurance costs.

    OEM RETROFITS - CRUISE CONTROL - SAT NAV - BLUETOOTH - AMI - HEADLIGHT SYSTEMS

    PARKING SYSTEMS - DIAGNOSTICS - FAULT FINDING - BODYWORK - PAINTWORK

  8. #7
    A3 Newbie... Haa

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    25
    well AMD offer extra 35-45 break with a stage one remap, leaving it at 175/185 - but i'm guessing that wouldnt necessarily means its faster due to suspension etc?
    or is the suspension the same?
    sorry for the amount of questions but am i complete noobie

  9. #8
    deano670's Avatar
    Too Much Hype

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    271
    Quote Originally Posted by ajda3 View Post
    is that one second slower after the remap then? or before?
    if i were to get the 140 and remap it would it then be on par or faster than the stock 170?
    the 140 is 1 second slower than the 170 before remapping.

    A remap would take the 140 between 170-190 - so yes it would be quicker than a 170.

    If I was you I would go for the 140 and see how you get on with it. Remap if needed.

    Black Edition?

  10. #9
    NHN
    NHN's Avatar
    Modmetractor

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Coding Something
    Posts
    26,722
    Quote Originally Posted by ajda3 View Post
    well AMD offer extra 35-45 break with a stage one remap, leaving it at 175/185 - but i'm guessing that wouldnt necessarily means its faster due to suspension etc?
    or is the suspension the same?
    sorry for the amount of questions but am i complete noobie
    Oh yes it will be quicker for sure, suspension type depends on version designation as in Sport, Sline, SE as to what parts are fitted.

    OEM RETROFITS - CRUISE CONTROL - SAT NAV - BLUETOOTH - AMI - HEADLIGHT SYSTEMS

    PARKING SYSTEMS - DIAGNOSTICS - FAULT FINDING - BODYWORK - PAINTWORK

  11. #10
    smudge_don's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sutton, Surrey
    Posts
    2,941
    Quote Originally Posted by N8 View Post
    I've driven a 170 DSG with a bluefin, and it felt slower than my 140 DSG, map the 140 and you'll be fine! Lower insurance too!
    My 170 was cheaper than my 140 to insure

    Quote Originally Posted by NHN View Post
    That would depend on age of car, if its the new 140's then they fly in stock form.

    & without sounding condescending Jord, as your 1st was 140 & this is 170 it would seem more responsive with the extra 30 horses fella as your 140 was stock.

    Lower insurance would depende if you declared the map etc as that would auto add higher insurance costs.
    The new 140's are pretty quick

    I love my 170, the 140 was ok but was lagging a little bit, the 170 is muvh better in my opinion

    If you really want to decide, go to a dealer and try out both, see what you like
    Currently driving a 55 plate Ford Mondeo ST. But as Arnie once said...


    I'll be back!!!

  12. #11
    piers90's Avatar
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    birmingham
    Posts
    90
    ive got a 170 quattro. did a drag race with a mate in a 140. nuthin in it at all!!!! felt ripped off for buyin the 170!
    A3 2.0tdi (170) Quattro S-line

    Mods -
    Badgless Grille
    S3 rear Bumper
    Black Brake Callipers
    19" New RS6 Rims
    Cupra R Front Lip/Splitter
    Alpine Touch Screen Headunit
    Alpine satnav/Freeview/DAB
    Rainbow Audio Speakers
    JL amps and sub
    Pipercross Venom Induction

  13. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by smudge_don View Post
    In a word, yes

    I've had both, and the 170 is so much more responsive

    Specially in DSG format
    It depends if you are talking about the 140/170 PD or the new 140/170 CR (common-rail) version. The 170PD/DSG I owned before my current Sportback was definitely better than my previous 140PD/DSG. A little more powerful and quite a bit smoother.

    But I test drove both the 140CR and the 170CR before I decided on my present 140CR Sportback. I preferred the 140 and performance wise there seem very little in it. The 140 seemed smoother and quieter than the 170 and I did not think the extra 900 was worth it. So I purchased a 140CR again with a DSG. I have subsequently had it remapped and it is probably producing something in the region of 170-175hp and the remap cost me 295. To me this is a lot better value that a 170CR at 900 more than a 140CR.
    Dave R (h5djr)
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A3 8V 2.0 TDI-184 Sportback Sport s-tronic quattro - Silver + lots of options - my 9th A3

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO

Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO