Sky InsuranceChris Nott
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 51
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Telling the difference between the 140 and 170 2.0 TDI

  1. #1
    Bugsy_27's Avatar
    Vorsprung Durch Technik

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Everywhere!
    Posts
    632

    Telling the difference between the 140 and 170 2.0 TDI

    Rang up about a 170 A3 I saw for sale on auto trader this morning and the first salesman I spoke to was fine and answered all my questions etc then when I rang back later I spoke to a different salesman who said that they didn't have a 170bhp A3!? I gave him the reg and he told me it was the 140 version, he checked and it was so this got me thinking, How can I tell the difference between the two when I go and view a car for myself?

    Thanks!
    Audi A3 2.0tdi S Line - Xenons, RNS-E, Bose, Black & Grey duo leather, MY11 rear lights, Shark Performance remap 183 bhp, Optics Grill with American plate delete, S3 Pedals, S3 vents, Weitec Coilovers, MY11 Black Edition FBSW

  2. # ADS
    ADS
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Global
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    West Yorkshire
    Posts
    118
    Get a HPI check done on the car, as well as checking the performance.
    Audi A3 (2005) 2.0 TDI Sport Quattro (140/ST3) 8P2
    RNS-E (2009 Map) & Cruise Control Installed!

  4. #3
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Telford
    Posts
    2,484
    Look under the boot carpet at the sticker on the boot floor, that normally tells you. Mine says DSG 140PS. The only visual difference is a 170bhp would definately have the Chrome exhaust trims.
    B6 1.8T Avant s line gmbh

  5. #4
    I noticed yesterday when I washed ans wxed my new 2.0 TDI-140 Sportback there is a small sticker inside the door opening near the door locking pin which says it's a 2.0 TDI-140ps.

    But certainly the sticker in boot or the inside front cover of the service book should say, at the beginning of the fourth line from the top, 103kw for a 140 and 125kw for a 170 following by the gearbox type and month/year the car was built.
    Dave R (h5djr)
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A3 8V 2.0 TDI-184 Sportback Sport s-tronic quattro - Silver + lots of options - my 9th A3

  6. #5
    aythree
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee_Malone View Post
    How can I tell the difference between the two when I go and view a car for myself?
    Drive it... hammer it to 60... if it takes about an hour to get there it's a 140... if it takes about 7 seconds then it's a 170

  7. #6
    Bugsy_27's Avatar
    Vorsprung Durch Technik

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Everywhere!
    Posts
    632
    Quote Originally Posted by aythree View Post
    Drive it... hammer it to 60... if it takes about an hour to get there it's a 140... if it takes about 7 seconds then it's a 170
    haha I've got a 1.2 Corsa at the minute so they both feel fast compared to that!

    Thanks for that guys, at least now I know things to look out for!
    Audi A3 2.0tdi S Line - Xenons, RNS-E, Bose, Black & Grey duo leather, MY11 rear lights, Shark Performance remap 183 bhp, Optics Grill with American plate delete, S3 Pedals, S3 vents, Weitec Coilovers, MY11 Black Edition FBSW

  8. #7
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    118
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee_Malone View Post
    haha I've got a 1.2 Corsa at the minute so they both feel fast compared to that!

    Thanks for that guys, at least now I know things to look out for!
    Quote Originally Posted by aythree View Post
    Drive it... hammer it to 60... if it takes about an hour to get there it's a 140... if it takes about 7 seconds then it's a 170

    lol, lmao.

    Get your stopwatch going!.

    A3 Sportback 2.0 tdi 140 0-60 9.6
    A3 Sportback 2.0 tdi 170 0-60 8.1
    A3 2.0 tdi 140 0-60 9.4
    A3 2.0 tdi 170 0-60 8.0


  9. #8
    Munnzzz's Avatar
    Top Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Northampton
    Posts
    60
    Hey, I believe the 170 has straight exhausts and the 140's point down towards road. If you need an HPI check i could do one 4u tomorrow as i work at a car dealership?
    2007 57 A3 Diesel Hatchback 2.0 TDi 170 S-line 3dr S-Tronic
    Extras - Black Styling Pack, Xenon Headlights, Privacy Glass, 18" 20 Spoke Alloy Wheels, Sat Nav, Heated Leather Seats, IPOD connection, BOSE sound system, De-badged Rear Tailgate

  10. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by aythree View Post
    Drive it... hammer it to 60... if it takes about an hour to get there it's a 140... if it takes about 7 seconds then it's a 170
    According to road tests carried out by Audi Driver magazine the 0-62 for the 170 is 7.9 secs and for the 140 9.1 secs. A whole 1.2 secs. You would never notice the difference unless you were timing it on a stopwatch.

    I have just traded-in a 170 Sportback and bought a new common-rail 140 Sportback and at 'normal' driving speeds I think there is very little to choose between them. The 170 has 6 mph more top speed but that is at over 140mph. The new 140 is quieter than the new 170 and considerable quieter than the PD170 or my previous PD140. It is also a lot smoother and has a much better mpg figure. The main difference I found between the two new common-rail versions when I test drove S-tronic versions of both cars is that I need to select a lower gear (I drive the S-tronic in manual mode almost all the time) for some corners and roundabouts in the 170 than I did in the 140. This, the better fuel consumption and the fact that it's quieter is the main reason I went for the 140 rather than the 170.
    Dave R (h5djr)
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A3 8V 2.0 TDI-184 Sportback Sport s-tronic quattro - Silver + lots of options - my 9th A3

  11. #10
    Boydie's Avatar
    Boycie

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Greenisland, Co.Antrim
    Posts
    4,765
    Quote Originally Posted by Munnzzz View Post
    Hey, I believe the 170 has straight exhausts and the 140's point down towards road. If you need an HPI check i could do one 4u tomorrow as i work at a car dealership?
    That is correct - with the earlier ones anyway, not sure if the new facelift 140's have straight exhausts as well!

  12. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Boydie View Post
    That is correct - with the earlier ones anyway, not sure if the new facelift 140's have straight exhausts as well!
    The new facelift 140, which are the new common-rail versions, do have straight exhausts. This is because the new 140 and the new 170 both have a DPF (Diesel Particulate Filter) fitted.
    Dave R (h5djr)
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A3 8V 2.0 TDI-184 Sportback Sport s-tronic quattro - Silver + lots of options - my 9th A3

  13. #12
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Telford
    Posts
    2,484
    Don't get too obsessed with getting a 170, theres not much in it, try out a few 140's and you will see how theres little in it. You would have more chance finding a well specced car with the 140 as they are more popular and they also dont have DPF which has been well known to cause all sorts of trouble.

    140 + Remap = Ideal!
    B6 1.8T Avant s line gmbh

  14. #13
    Rear Ender

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    111
    1.4 secs faster 0-62, higher torque rate...
    Test drive for yourself and you will see, the drivetrain pulls alot more and feels a better drive in the 170...
    I test drove both and the 140 wasnt really that exciting, mind you the 140 was a sportback and the 170 was 3 door.

    10 mph top end difference

    The mpg is 1.3mpg difference (urban), 0mpg (extra urban) and 1.1mpg (combined). the figures speak.
    If you were in a 140 against a 170 you would feel inadequate and get left behind.

  15. #14
    Boydie's Avatar
    Boycie

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Greenisland, Co.Antrim
    Posts
    4,765
    Cheaper option, 140 with remap will surpass a stock 170 plus no DPF issues

  16. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Boydie View Post
    Cheaper option, 140 with remap will surpass a stock 170 plus no DPF issues
    Much more expensive to insure a 'chipped' 140 that a standard 170.

    Personally I never had a single 'DPF issue' with my 170 in 2.5 years and 30,000 miles.
    Dave R (h5djr)
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A3 8V 2.0 TDI-184 Sportback Sport s-tronic quattro - Silver + lots of options - my 9th A3

  17. #16
    Bugsy_27's Avatar
    Vorsprung Durch Technik

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Everywhere!
    Posts
    632
    Quote Originally Posted by h5djr View Post
    Much more expensive to insure a 'chipped' 140 that a standard 170.
    I was thinking that, insurance on the 170 isnt bad for me-just over 700.

    I'm just going to have to keep on looking i guess, theres got to be one out there thats just right!
    Audi A3 2.0tdi S Line - Xenons, RNS-E, Bose, Black & Grey duo leather, MY11 rear lights, Shark Performance remap 183 bhp, Optics Grill with American plate delete, S3 Pedals, S3 vents, Weitec Coilovers, MY11 Black Edition FBSW

  18. #17
    FL1X's Avatar
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    59
    I test drove a 170 Manual and a 170 DSG before i brought my 140 the insurance wasnt much different but the 140 was a cheaper option and i have to say the difference in performance is minimal, ive been recorded doing 0-60ish in just shy of 9 seconds this was done in car with a stop watch so hardly a sterling figure but even so.

    Facts and figures aside, there are few times that you will be at the line in the racing mood and have a 170 next to you who can launch of the line.

  19. #18
    Dorsprung Turch Vechnique

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Glasvegas
    Posts
    162
    This is going to sound weird but I have driven my new 140 for a week and a half and it feels very strong in acceleration. Listen, i've come from the 197bhp TFSI and i'm not disappointed - serious.

    I was all set to get it mapped immediately but I reckon i'll spent the 500 on Sat Nav first. After i've driven the car for 6months and got used to it, a remap will feel even better then.

    Take it from me - the 140bhp is a great engine, and the torque available means you wouldn't notice a difference with an extra 30bhp lads.
    2003 - A3 Volcanic Black 1.6i 8L
    2004 - A3 Ming Blue 1.8TQ 8L
    2005 - A3 Dolphin Grey 2.0FSI 8P
    2006 - Driving sabbatical ;-)
    2007 - A3 Ibis White 2.0TFSI 8p
    2009 - A3 Monza Silver BE 2.0 TDI 8p

  20. #19
    aythree
    Guest
    If I had the choice I'd opt for the car that can accelerates to about 60 in under 8 seconds over a one that does it over 9 seconds all day long.

    Not sure the reasoning that you'd never be in the racing mood and up against a 170 at the same time really applies.

    For me, living in London, a quick get away and acceleration up to 40-60 is very useful and important i.e. zipping on to busy roundabouts, merging on to busy dual carriage ways, accelerating from double lane traffic lights which merge into one after 20 meters or so, and overtaking.

    Looking around I find the average car on the road is usually capable of something between 9-12 seconds (i've got a mental note of most car's acceleration figures just so I know whether to try it on with them or not!! ), so having a car that is on average a couple of seconds quicker than most others will put you in a good position in most road scenarios. Whereas a car that does it in about 9 will be ok in a lot of situations but will leave you wanting frequent enough for it to become an issue at some point. At least that's what i've found.

    I know i've put a lot of focus on 0-60 times, and I know there are other factors to consider, but I do find that the quicker the quoted 0-60 time is the better the car performs in "urban" driving situations.

    Guess it just depends how you want your car to drive and which part of it's performance is most important to you.

  21. #20
    Matt's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Cumbria
    Posts
    1,416
    You've got the new 140 Ian. I've driven both the new 140 and the old 140 and they are worlds apart. The new 140 seems a lot quicker, its a cracking little engine, nothing like the old 140.

    If we are talking old 140 vs new 170 from experience of both:
    I was happy to get a 140 when I was looking but had a go in the 170 when I got offered the chance... and I'm driving a 170 now funnily enough as a result! Pulls so much stronger all the way to the redline, feels more responsive and alert than the 140, had no DPF issues and I'm up to 20,000 miles. 42MPG average.

    I've had a couple of 140 loan cars since getting the 170 plus driven my dads old 140 when he had it at length too and they do feel a bit sluggish as stock and run out of puff early on. Bit rougher engine note too. Feel more like a typical diesel in the way they drive.

    Remapped one will sort out the sluggishness but then extra expense and hassle of insuring a non standard car (if you are going to be legit).
    Sold: A3 2.0 TDI 170 S-line | Full leather | BOSE | Phantom Black | Bluefin
    Now: Mini John Cooper Works

  22. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt View Post
    You've got the new 140 Ian. I've driven both the new 140 and the old 140 and they are worlds apart. The new 140 seems a lot quicker, its a cracking little engine, nothing like the old 140.
    I agree. I've owned a old 140, an old 170 and now I have a new common-rail 140 and better by far that either of the older ones.

    Personally when I drove both, I prefered the new 140 to the new 170. Both are now fitted with a DPF.
    Dave R (h5djr)
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A3 8V 2.0 TDI-184 Sportback Sport s-tronic quattro - Silver + lots of options - my 9th A3

  23. #22
    Bugsy_27's Avatar
    Vorsprung Durch Technik

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Everywhere!
    Posts
    632
    Just came across this one this morning and I love it BUT it out of my price range!!

    http://search.autotrader.co.uk/es-uk...leRegLetter=57
    Audi A3 2.0tdi S Line - Xenons, RNS-E, Bose, Black & Grey duo leather, MY11 rear lights, Shark Performance remap 183 bhp, Optics Grill with American plate delete, S3 Pedals, S3 vents, Weitec Coilovers, MY11 Black Edition FBSW

  24. #23
    maars's Avatar
    Full speed ahead

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    567
    More importantly get a quattro over a 2wd
    Daytona RS4 Avant :: black optics

  25. #24
    Bugsy_27's Avatar
    Vorsprung Durch Technik

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Everywhere!
    Posts
    632
    Quote Originally Posted by maars View Post
    More importantly get a quattro over a 2wd
    You think? I havent really been to bothered about that, just as long as it was 56 onwards, black, s line, 170 and had bose I was happy.

    What does everyone else think? 2wd or quattro?
    Audi A3 2.0tdi S Line - Xenons, RNS-E, Bose, Black & Grey duo leather, MY11 rear lights, Shark Performance remap 183 bhp, Optics Grill with American plate delete, S3 Pedals, S3 vents, Weitec Coilovers, MY11 Black Edition FBSW

  26. #25
    10blazin's Avatar
    HYPERDRIVE NEEDED

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    gorton
    Posts
    3,272
    it costs more in fuel but handles so much better ......and gets off rapid , but your getting a diesel so id go for qauttro if you have found an a3 without and your set on it then no big deal pal

  27. #26
    Bugsy_27's Avatar
    Vorsprung Durch Technik

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Everywhere!
    Posts
    632
    hmm perhaps I should add the quattro to my list then ha its getting harder and harder to find one now lol
    Audi A3 2.0tdi S Line - Xenons, RNS-E, Bose, Black & Grey duo leather, MY11 rear lights, Shark Performance remap 183 bhp, Optics Grill with American plate delete, S3 Pedals, S3 vents, Weitec Coilovers, MY11 Black Edition FBSW

  28. #27
    10blazin's Avatar
    HYPERDRIVE NEEDED

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    gorton
    Posts
    3,272
    it will be for 13 g but when i look on audi at the cars the spec on mine and milage pisses on the ones on there now mine should of been easy 17 kgot it for 14950 so hold out one will pop up

  29. #28
    Matt's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Cumbria
    Posts
    1,416
    I dont have Quattro. Its probably nice if you find one at the right price with it but its definately not a must have. You wont struggle with FWD.

    Higher tyre wear on the rear wheels, worse on fuel and more expense with servicing!
    Sold: A3 2.0 TDI 170 S-line | Full leather | BOSE | Phantom Black | Bluefin
    Now: Mini John Cooper Works

  30. #29
    10blazin's Avatar
    HYPERDRIVE NEEDED

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    gorton
    Posts
    3,272
    your right you wont struggle with fwd , but youde struggle to stick with a qauttro dry wet or snow ....you make it almost sound like a negative lol

  31. #30
    Bugsy_27's Avatar
    Vorsprung Durch Technik

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Everywhere!
    Posts
    632
    Quote Originally Posted by 10blazin View Post
    your right you wont struggle with fwd , but youde struggle to stick with a qauttro dry wet or snow ....you make it almost sound like a negative lol
    haha Ill see what comes up first then
    Audi A3 2.0tdi S Line - Xenons, RNS-E, Bose, Black & Grey duo leather, MY11 rear lights, Shark Performance remap 183 bhp, Optics Grill with American plate delete, S3 Pedals, S3 vents, Weitec Coilovers, MY11 Black Edition FBSW

  32. #31
    Matt's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Cumbria
    Posts
    1,416
    I was pointing out the negatives yes. If you find one with it go for it but if the right one comes along but without Quattro it'll be fine.
    Sold: A3 2.0 TDI 170 S-line | Full leather | BOSE | Phantom Black | Bluefin
    Now: Mini John Cooper Works

  33. #32
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Solihull, West Mids
    Posts
    34
    I presume the 170 versions have slightly longer gearing than the 140 given that the 170 has a higher top speed?

  34. #33
    Dorsprung Turch Vechnique

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Glasvegas
    Posts
    162
    Lee if you go in with 16.5-17k that guy will bite your hand off.

    He's basing his price on the fact he has 11k miles only, but its a year and a half old and its been usurped already - so he'll never get 20 grand for that.

    Give him a ring - he'll say no and then phone you back in a week any bets
    2003 - A3 Volcanic Black 1.6i 8L
    2004 - A3 Ming Blue 1.8TQ 8L
    2005 - A3 Dolphin Grey 2.0FSI 8P
    2006 - Driving sabbatical ;-)
    2007 - A3 Ibis White 2.0TFSI 8p
    2009 - A3 Monza Silver BE 2.0 TDI 8p

  35. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by BenUK View Post
    I presume the 170 versions have slightly longer gearing than the 140 given that the 170 has a higher top speed?
    I don't think so. If I remember correctly I have looked at the gear and final drive ratios on each in Elsawin and they are the same. The extra 30ps may allow the 170 to get to a slightly higher maximum revs in 6th gear.
    Dave R (h5djr)
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A3 8V 2.0 TDI-184 Sportback Sport s-tronic quattro - Silver + lots of options - my 9th A3

  36. #35
    maars's Avatar
    Full speed ahead

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    567
    I test drove a 140 2wd vs a 170 quattro and for me there was no comparison - the pickup/torque of the 170 and sheer traction/cornering grip of the 4wd was far better. Plus the extra safety afforded by 4wd. The 170 feels more like a petrol engine too, especially the way it revs out. Given my last car was a Clio V6 it was a tough trade-in but a sensible family car beckoned!
    Last edited by maars; 9th May 2009 at 09:13.
    PilotAudi likes this.
    Daytona RS4 Avant :: black optics

  37. #36
    just017's Avatar
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    438
    You can find out by the Engine code.

    I belive BKD is the 140 version, so if you go to see one and under the bonnet, on one of the stickers it has BKD, then i believe its 140 version

  38. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by just017 View Post
    You can find out by the Engine code.

    I belive BKD is the 140 version, so if you go to see one and under the bonnet, on one of the stickers it has BKD, then i believe its 140 version
    Audi also used a code BMM for the 140 engine between 06/05 and 06/08.

    BKD was used between 05/03 and 05/07. My last (July 2004) 140 was a BKD.
    Dave R (h5djr)
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A3 8V 2.0 TDI-184 Sportback Sport s-tronic quattro - Silver + lots of options - my 9th A3

  39. #38
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    2,489
    Do they not do the red i thing VW used to do? ie the 140 would have a silver TD and a red I, but the 170 would have a silver T and red DI
    Hunt is over

    1st Audi - 2001 Ming Blue 8L S3 210
    2nd Audi - 2008 Black 8P2 S3 3dr
    and now - 2007 Daytona Grey B7 RS4 saloon

  40. #39
    devonmikeyboy's Avatar
    As far from JBS as possible !

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,257
    Quote Originally Posted by h5djr View Post
    Audi also used a code BMM for the 140 engine between 06/05 and 06/08.

    BKD was used between 05/03 and 05/07. My last (July 2004) 140 was a BKD.
    BKD is the engine code for the PD140 16 valve without a DPF
    BMM is the engine code for the PD140 8 valve with a DPF.

    Quote Originally Posted by MartayMcFly View Post
    Do they not do the red i thing VW used to do? ie the 140 would have a silver TD and a red I, but the 170 would have a silver T and red DI
    No they don`t.
    06 Audi 2.0 PD140 Sport TDI Quattro S-LINE.
    Old engine 330 bhp @ flywheel 263 bhp @ wheel 490 lb torque. Audidriver write up HERE
    Now stripped and playing with an uprated Cryo treated engine fitted with bigger turbo,water/methanol,uprated injectors etc etc.Wanting 400 bhp and 500 lb torque.

    Other car 500+ bhp MK4 Golf R32 turbo.

  41. #40
    Shark in a Goldfishes clothing

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    576
    This may be wrong but the Audi dealer told me that the 140 has a single exhaust pipe out the back and the 170 has 2 pipes?

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO

Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO