EM TuningJMB Retrofits
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: S3 95RON

  1. #1
    Reverse Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    15

    S3 95RON

    Hey I am thinking of getting an S3 sportback as a company car and wanted to know if it can run on 95RON or if it will only run on 98RON. I know 98RON is recommended but would it be ok on 95 with the odd bit of 98 thrown here and there. Reason I ask is if I am using it for business don't want to be chucking in 98RON all the time as I will only be getting 13ppbm.

    thanks in advance.

  2. # ADS
    ADS
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2
    JamS3's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Stockton-on-Tees
    Posts
    2,248
    Yes of course it will work but at a lower performance than if you use 98ron.

    I used v power from new in mine.
    NOW - Audi S3 Facelift - Sprint Blue, RNS-E Sat Nav, SDS, Bluetooth Phone Prep, Bose, Cruise, Buckets, FBMFSW, Adaptive Lights, Int Light Pack, Tyre Pressure Monitor, Piano Black Inserts, Through Load, Auto Dim RV Mirror/Wing, Auto Wipers/Lights, Folding Door Mirrors, Heated Seats, Ipod Dock, Front Arm Rest, Rear/Front Parking Sensors, 1st Aid Kit, Rear Arm Rest, H + R Springs, Front 15mm Spacers, Rear 10mm Spacers.

  4. #3
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    It will be fine , but it may run a little rough on 95ron.

    It will also be slower than if you use 98-99ron fuel.

    p

  5. #4
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    North East, UK
    Posts
    91
    I nearly always run mine on 95ron. I didn't even know it was supposed to be run on 98ron!

    It has to be said though that the odd time that I do put Tesco 99ron in, it does make alot of difference performance wise.




  6. #5
    4th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    West London
    Posts
    850
    You will find that as the car is running on lower ron than it was mapped to run on it will retard the ignition. This will cause you power and MPG to drop, paying the bit extra for 98ron will not really cost you any difference(once you take mileage into account) as the car will run better on it and your mpg will go up. There will be no other bad effect though by running lower ron fuel as the ECU is designed to adapt and retard the ignition to accept it.
    Now:BMW 530d M-sport tourer. Then:Lava Grey A3 Sportback S-line 2.0TFSI Quattro, S-line Special Edition, Xenon Plus, Leather, Light and Rain Pack, Interior light Pack, Bose, DVD Nav+, Bluetooth, Multifunction wheel,Cruise, Heated Front Seats, Folding Mirrors, Rear Parking Sensor and some other bits.

  7. #6
    windsurfer

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    London, Porto
    Posts
    1,327
    98 on mine!! And it is noticiable that the car does prefer 98 to 95.... it just doesn't feel right on 95.

    But you can run it on 95.. yes.

    Pedro
    FOR SALE: S3 Phantom Black, left hand drive, Xenons, FBMFSW, bucket seats, BOSE, rear parking sensors, armrest, interior light package, Symphony II+. Full Audi service history and 4 new Michelin Pilot Sport 2. 18500 miles PM for details! I want to give it away have a good family reason. For a quick sale around 19.5k PM only if interest is genuine! Thanks

  8. #7
    I cant spell !

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North West
    Posts
    434
    Ran mine in on 95 ron - but then as most of that was stop start in traffic could not see the point of putting 98 or better in.
    Most of the time it gets optimax, but will use 95 if desperate - but dont tend to boot it when using 95. Tend to find the car annoying slow to adjust to different fuels ie optimax or tesco 99.

    Richard
    MY12 Black edition TT Roadster with a tractor engine !

  9. #8
    RobinA3's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    1,763
    As above really.

    You'll be fine with 95ron but you will see a difference in performance, the lower octane will be a weaker burn therefore the ECU will retard the igniton angle due to higher knock retard for the cylinders.

    Engine development always use 95ron at one stage of the development process as not every country gets nice fuel, the yanks struggle to get more than 92ron last time i was over there!

  10. #9
    Young un's Avatar
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    101
    Quote Originally Posted by rsarjantson View Post
    Ran mine in on 95 ron - but then as most of that was stop start in traffic could not see the point of putting 98 or better in.
    Most of the time it gets optimax, but will use 95 if desperate - but dont tend to boot it when using 95. Tend to find the car annoying slow to adjust to different fuels ie optimax or tesco 99.

    Richard

    Im no 'techno boffin' but I thought I read somewhere that it wasnt 'healthy' to mix 95/98 fuels. (Forgive me if this is a load of nonsense)
    Im also under the impression that 98 is a 'cleaner & purer' fuel hence less 'knocking' effect and supposedly better performance

  11. #10
    RobinA3's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    1,763
    Its fine to mix the fuel, the engine has knock control so the ECU adapts (learns) as you drive.

  12. #11
    4th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    West London
    Posts
    850
    Quote Originally Posted by RobinA3 View Post
    the yanks struggle to get more than 92ron last time i was over there!
    America uses Mon rather than Ron for the rating for its fuel. 92Mon is the same as 98Ron over here. There are gas stations selling 105Mon over there imagine how potent that would be.
    Now:BMW 530d M-sport tourer. Then:Lava Grey A3 Sportback S-line 2.0TFSI Quattro, S-line Special Edition, Xenon Plus, Leather, Light and Rain Pack, Interior light Pack, Bose, DVD Nav+, Bluetooth, Multifunction wheel,Cruise, Heated Front Seats, Folding Mirrors, Rear Parking Sensor and some other bits.

  13. #12
    RobinA3's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    1,763
    Quote Originally Posted by Dandle View Post
    America uses Mon rather than Ron for the rating for its fuel. 92Mon is the same as 98Ron over here. There are gas stations selling 105Mon over there imagine how potent that would be.
    ah right, didn't notice that it was Mon not Ron....................

  14. #13
    RobinA3's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    1,763
    Quote Originally Posted by Dandle View Post
    There are gas stations selling 105Mon over there imagine how potent that would be.
    That would be good, wind in some major advance spark!

  15. #14
    4th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    West London
    Posts
    850
    Quote Originally Posted by Yung Fook View Post
    Im no 'techno boffin' but I thought I read somewhere that it wasnt 'healthy' to mix 95/98 fuels. (Forgive me if this is a load of nonsense)
    Im also under the impression that 98 is a 'cleaner & purer' fuel hence less 'knocking' effect and supposedly better performance
    It isnt cleaner or purer, the octane rating is the level the fuel will ignite at(higher level better bang, lower level more burn less bang). If the engine senser knock it retards the ignition which is what happens on 95ron. It will not harm the engine but to make the most out of any fuel change the ECU will take about 3-4 tank fulls to get the ignition to optimum. So changing fuels each tank gets you no where.
    Now:BMW 530d M-sport tourer. Then:Lava Grey A3 Sportback S-line 2.0TFSI Quattro, S-line Special Edition, Xenon Plus, Leather, Light and Rain Pack, Interior light Pack, Bose, DVD Nav+, Bluetooth, Multifunction wheel,Cruise, Heated Front Seats, Folding Mirrors, Rear Parking Sensor and some other bits.

  16. #15
    Reverse Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    15
    Thanks for the replies. I thougth that it would be ok but just wanted to check that it would not harm the engine. How noticeable is the difference between using 95RON and 98RON, is there really that much difference?

  17. #16
    L60N
    Guest
    I "had" to put 95 in mine once, as i was running so low and couldnt find a decent garage.

    The car ran less smoothly, a little hesitant from a standing start, and a much less smooth power delivery, with less urgency.

    I couldnt wait to get 98 back in...

  18. #17
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    Quote Originally Posted by Vorsprung Durch Technik View Post
    Thanks for the replies. I thougth that it would be ok but just wanted to check that it would not harm the engine. How noticeable is the difference between using 95RON and 98RON, is there really that much difference?
    If you run 95ron all the time i don't reckon your car would make much over book figure 265ps , on a recent RR day cars that use 99ron ( from new )fuel , saw as much as 294ps on the rollers.

    p

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO

Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO