I find that very hard to believe. You keep agreeing with my comments and then tearing them apart in the same paragraph.
Because much of them are valid and I agree with...but others I'm trying to offer an opposing view...which you seem incapable of seeing.
From a personal point of view, I've played with chassis set up, diffs, TC systems, launch control systems and 4WD systems...and there are plusses each way...
I don't believe that it's possible to state that 4WD is better than FWD. There are too many factors to consider.
Again, my comments are generalisations, and they are my opinions.
...and all I'm trying to do is offer an example of why the generisation may not be true.
I'm not out to argue...merely offering an alternative view...I couldn't care whether you think a 4WD car makes the world go round or not...i'm merely presenting facts and experiences that support an alternative view.
Again I know not every 4WD car is better than every FWD. But if you were to take those great FWDs like the ITR and make them 4WD, and I will again include the caveat of it being set up properly, they would be faster. In a straight line or around a bend.
I honestly don't believe a car like the ITR would be better with 4WD.
It would be heavier, loose the chassis balalnce and the adjustablilty...regardless of how you set it up...you can't hide extra weight.
My opinion...but I don't believe it would be faster round a bend, or in a straight line. Off the mark, over the first 20-30m perhaps...but after that, it would be no faster and the handling would be compromised.
But in the environment that we live in of course we can't drive our cars anywhere near the limit on british roads.
Why?
There are trackdays...
And smoothly surfaced back roads miles from any other road users (at least up in Scotland there are)
The most common example of someone using trying to use all the power in their car is TLGP. Whether you agree with the concept or not you have to agree that in that situation, with similarly matched power outputs (although in the wet they don't have to be that similar lol) 4WD is king.
In all honestly...I can't say from experience as I must have been 17 and driving a Nova last time I felt the need to 'race off traffic lights'.
Not for me, I'm afraid...
But I get your point...if it's your thing.
And I am a bit of a fan of TLGPs,
Ok...
I'm not.
I'll leave it for the young Chavs in their Saxos and Corsas...
in the town I live it is literally a set every 200m on average, so it's pretty much the only way you can give it the beans, so again I'll say, in my opinion 200HP or more wastes a lot of power spinning the wheels so why bother.
I don't have any traffic lights in my town.
If you drive on lots of sweeping A roads then yeah of course a high powered FWD car will still be great fun, but when it comes to TLGPs you won't do so well. So why not buy a car that's good at both? The only people who it wouldn't really effect is those who never do TLGP, they don't need the traction of a 4WD so much and a good FWD would do them fine. But there are not many of those about.
Looks like you are speaking to one!
I do most of my driving on A and B roads...I don't commute in my cars, I live 100 miles from a motorway...so I guess I'm someone who doesn't necesarily need the 4WD.
But I own a 4WD 911...
Regardless of my choices of cars...I still see that 200 BHP isn't the limit for FWD, and that with careful setting up, FWD can match the 4WD cars...loose out in some areas, gain in others.
I'll use the focus RS example again though. They're planning to put up to 300bhp in it with FWD. Now yes of course if they develop it properly it'll be a great car, but how much of a better car would it be with 4WD? And if so then why not fit it with it? If audi can do it for a car only £2000 more expensive to buy (although I think most of that is the interior compared to a focus) why can't ford?
Many reasons...
Ford believe their chassis is good enough to deploy 300 BHP...whilst I have doubt that 300 BHP and suitable torque is easily put to the tarmac, with suitable electronics, I'm sure it will be.
Fords have great chassis...far better than the Audi equivelant.
Would it be 'better' with 4WD?
I don't know...it would be heavier, wear out clutches more...be faster over the first few meters...but better? I don't know.
It's not possible to say.
I guess they have to make a car down to a price (something Ford have always been good at)...so maybe it's too expensive to develop a bespoke 4WD system for it, based on the projected price?
The Audi system was developed years ago, so costs little to implement...and the costs are shared accross 4 makers (All VAG).
Anyway...this is going nowhere...
4WD is good...
But people shouldn't just assume that FWD is worse. That's all I'm aqttempting to suggest.