Chris NottAH Fabrications
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 81 to 120 of 141
  1. #81
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    Ive already said spins car felt faster and more eager than mine , coz of the extra torque , and he had me in the car!

    So there is no doubting a mapped car would be quicker!

    Agreed i need to drive my own car mapped on my own to help me decide.

    I know your disappoined Martain , and thats understandable , but i don't think there was any FUDGING FIGURES going on , coz if that was the case STD would of made STD power , Revo and GIAC would of made more than STD, and the APR map they put on Mitch78's car would of wiped the floor with everyone!

    Thanks

    leon

  2. # ADS
    ADS
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Global
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #82
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    310
    Its not necesarily the peak figures that are important, but rather the figures throughout the range (ie the area under the graph on the rolling road plots).

    Eg, a mapped car may only have 10bhp more at peak power than a standard car, but at certain points in the rev range it could have 30bhp more, that sort of thing would make a big difference to how fast the car is.

    If anyone is fudging the figures its the remapping companies when they sell their chips/remaps, after all, with all other things being equal you'd choose the remap that gave the most power, hence why the 'Hammer' 330bhp map is proving irrisistable to many when compared to everyone else 305-310bhp maps. The reality would appear to be that the 330bhp map is not hugely more powerful than revos 310bhp map at peak power, however maybe it generates far mopre torque/bhp throughout the range when compared to a standard or a revo remapped car.

    It would be really useful for you guys to each post copies of your rolling road plots so that we can overlay them and look at the full picture, and not the the headline power figures.

  4. #83
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    Mines up!

    I think the STD cars made more than the book , and the map cars made slightly less than claimed.

    Theres no doubting a mapped car would be quicker than a STD car.

    p

  5. #84
    Spin140's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Derbyshire, England
    Posts
    2,013
    I'm only disappointed because I didn't feel the day went as well as previous I've been too, the figures have always been relative and I know this only too well but I have come to expect greater things of Awesome. Not exactly confidence inspiring when one minute its FWD and the next it's 4WD.

    I only wanted Clutch figures to add some substance to GIAC power claims, I can review my own findings all day long and tell you Guys that in my opinion its fast in both Hammer and normal 310 GIAC mapped form but some 'estimate' figures would add weight for those considering a remap, again this is for the benefit of Forum members not so I get a pat on the back in the pub.

    I don't have enough technical knowledge about Dyno's to argue a strong case but common sense must prevail, transmission losses would be expected to be a lot higher, looking at the Regal dyno plot the GIAC 310 map made 308.5bhp at the flywheel and only 225 at the wheels, this is in line with what we have begun to expect from haldex equipped cars so we have 3 conclusions -

    1) The dyno process was not correct on the day.
    2) Audi screwed up with the standard cars and fitted some 'project' RS3 engines by accident.
    3) Revo an GIAC are a complete waste of money and all power claims total Cobblers.


    Its up to the individual but I've had 6 cars remapped to date and all have come within 5bhp of the claims made by mapping companies, I'm also a hard person to please from a customer service perspective with extremely high expectations so would have no problem complaining I wasn't being offered value for money - the S3 certainly feels very different behind the wheel so as long as everyone is happy with their choices made enough said.....
    Wife - 12 BMW 320D 181 bhp, 8 Speed Auto, Melbourne Red, Heated Leather, privacy.
    10 S3 SB, Phantom, Buckets,Int light Pack, Privacy. (Sold)
    Golf GTi MK6 - Revo stage 2, ITG, Milltek Race TBE, AP Racing 4 pot BBK - Sold.
    10 S3 SB, Phantom, Buckets,Int light Pack, Privacy,Nav, Park sensors, 6 disc, Revo Stage 1, ITG Enclosed Intake - Sold
    BMW M135i F20 - Bloody good straight from the box !

    "Fast Cars are Safer...."

  6. #85
    Spin140's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Derbyshire, England
    Posts
    2,013
    All the results will be available on Awesomes web-site along with pics etc...
    Wife - 12 BMW 320D 181 bhp, 8 Speed Auto, Melbourne Red, Heated Leather, privacy.
    10 S3 SB, Phantom, Buckets,Int light Pack, Privacy. (Sold)
    Golf GTi MK6 - Revo stage 2, ITG, Milltek Race TBE, AP Racing 4 pot BBK - Sold.
    10 S3 SB, Phantom, Buckets,Int light Pack, Privacy,Nav, Park sensors, 6 disc, Revo Stage 1, ITG Enclosed Intake - Sold
    BMW M135i F20 - Bloody good straight from the box !

    "Fast Cars are Safer...."

  7. #86
    paddy's Avatar
    Audi=No fault code, no idea

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    5,135
    Interesting thread.
    As has been stated I really wouldn't worry to much about power output readings. I have not run a car on a RR to be honest but i have run some very quick bikes on a Dyno over the years. Results are pretty good for before and after mods and comparisons to other bikes but peak power results should be taken with a pinch of salt IMHO. They can vary quite a bit from Dyno to Dyno. Another factor with bikes is ram air effect. Most air boxes need, when running at say 150mph, a 150mph draft blowing into them. I would assume cars are no different. Even tyre pressures can zap power when you are trying to read it through the wheels and looking for a few BHP at 200BHP+.
    I don't want to belittle the tests but look on them as a comparison to other cars on the day and not a true power output.
    Ibis white Revo S3 and now matching Vivaro LWB HR 2900 :-)

    Many people are alive because its illegal to shoot them.

  8. #87
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    As ive said else where these engaines seem to be putting out upto 20bhp more than claimed when run in and good fuel used, Mk2 Cupra is putting out 260bhp all over the country on different RR's , the same with the ED 30 , and reading some of the std S3 owners runs from the past and the two runs from the other day the S3 seems to be doing the same!

    TT-S 275bhp std?

    Thanks

    p
    Last edited by phantom; 10th March 2008 at 13:26.

  9. #88
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    383
    Quote Originally Posted by paddy View Post
    Interesting thread.
    As has been stated I really wouldn't worry to much about power output readings. I have not run a car on a RR to be honest but i have run some very quick bikes on a Dyno over the years. Results are pretty good for before and after mods and comparisons to other bikes but peak power results should be taken with a pinch of salt IMHO. They can vary quite a bit from Dyno to Dyno. Another factor with bikes is ram air effect. Most air boxes need, when running at say 150mph, a 150mph draft blowing into them. I would assume cars are no different. Even tyre pressures can zap power when you are trying to read it through the wheels and looking for a few BHP at 200BHP+.
    I don't want to belittle the tests but look on them as a comparison to other cars on the day and not a true power output.
    Have to agree totally, had many discussions about the gains from various remaps and in most cases a sensible remap will give 10-15 bhp
    on their own with no other mods

  10. #89
    paddy's Avatar
    Audi=No fault code, no idea

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    5,135
    Off topic a bit but slightly relevant....
    I remember one day seeing a couple of guys really fighting it out on a Dyno with a couple of road bikes. the guy that won was about 18stone with a R1 the other guy was crestfallen that his GSXR1000 was consistently down on the RI.
    Point was, he was about 12stone , 6 stone lighter than his mate.
    Now for arguments sake the bikes were 350 lb each but with riders were 518lb and 600lb. so power to weigh ratio ( which is what its all about) with the quick bike producing 160 BHP and the slow bike 150BHP equates to 150/518= .29BHP per lb and 160/600= .26BHP per lb so the 150BHP bike would have been considerably quicker on the road with his power to weight ratio about 8-10% better.
    What i am getting at is that by losing a couple of stone, taking the spare wheel and tool box out the boot and leaving the wife at home you will probably be better off than having a remap both performance and financially :-))
    Ibis white Revo S3 and now matching Vivaro LWB HR 2900 :-)

    Many people are alive because its illegal to shoot them.

  11. #90
    Vtec Abuser's Avatar
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Lincoln
    Posts
    306
    Quote Originally Posted by dipstic View Post
    Have to agree totally, had many discussions about the gains from various remaps and in most cases a sensible remap will give 10-15 bhp
    on their own with no other mods
    Sorry, but don't agree with that at all..
    10-15bhp would be only slighty noticeable IMO and if I switch my map off and compare the difference, it aint 10-15bhp, NO CHANCE! Yeah, some cars on occasions don't take to a remap to well and don't give the figures they should. But a normal map should give a lot more. Plus I very much doubt a LCR with just 240bhp (222 standard) would run a 14.0 @ 99mph, do you?
    I do agree that they don't give as much as some owners are led to believe though. I would say about 30-35bhp on average..


  12. #91
    paddy's Avatar
    Audi=No fault code, no idea

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    5,135
    Cheers dipstic
    Remember that its always cheaper to shed a few pounds from a vehicle than to add a few BHP. The reason an S3 is a bit Quicker than a 3.2 is probably nothing much to do with the extra 10 BHP but a whole load to do with the weight of the engine. In the bike world its ALL about junking weight by adding carbon fibre fairings and titanium this and that.. In the car world people seem to go out of there way to add weight !! You ever felt the weight of electric/heated seats !! put them in an S3 and your probably back to 3.2 performance straight away...
    You get the picture.
    Ibis white Revo S3 and now matching Vivaro LWB HR 2900 :-)

    Many people are alive because its illegal to shoot them.

  13. #92
    boggysv's Avatar
    3rd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    572
    Just a quick observation here, anyone feel that the graphs posted here and are too "rough/jaggered" ? And this is even with the smoothing is SAE 5.

    Other results from the dyno day here
    Rolling Road @ Awesome *RESULTS*

    Here's a comparison of smoothing factors
    http://www.bishopsperformance.com/dynoinfo.htm
    World's Fastest S3 Driver - racing old people in toyota camries since 1997 with a 97.6% winning rate.

  14. #93
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    383
    Quote Originally Posted by Vtec Abuser View Post
    Sorry, but don't agree with that at all..
    10-15bhp would be only slighty noticeable IMO and if I switch my map off and compare the difference, it aint 10-15bhp, NO CHANCE! Yeah, some cars on occasions don't take to a remap to well and don't give the figures they should. But a normal map should give a lot more. Plus I very much doubt a LCR with just 240bhp (222 standard) would run a 14.0 @ 99mph, do you?
    I do agree that they don't give as much as some owners are led to believe though. I would say about 30-35bhp on average..
    Only saying what I have seen (on dyno) which is not the same as a real quarter mile run,and many tuning companies tend to over inflate the performance gains on exhausts,remaps,intake mods hence dynos really only any use for before/after mods and I have never seen a proven gain of 30-35 bhp just with a remap yet on a standard setup.
    Last edited by dipstic; 10th March 2008 at 14:38.

  15. #94
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    All the plots from the RR day read SAE 0.99

    p

  16. #95
    boggysv's Avatar
    3rd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    572
    Quote Originally Posted by phantom View Post
    All the plots from the RR day read SAE 0.99

    p
    0.99 correction factor
    sae 5 smoothing factor

    Yet they still look rough...I think?
    World's Fastest S3 Driver - racing old people in toyota camries since 1997 with a 97.6% winning rate.

  17. #96
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    Quote Originally Posted by dipstic View Post
    Only saying what I have seen (on dyno) which is not the same as a real quarter mile run,and many tuning companies tend to over inflate the performance gains on exhausts,remaps,intake mods hence dynos really only any use for before/after mods and I have never seen a proven gain of 30-35 bhp just with a remap yet on a standard setup.
    It's in the tunners interest to claim " up to blah, blah, blah " i'm not saying the claims can't be achieved, i'm the lad who spent 400 on a remap for a handful of BHP on a N/A engaine.

    Sometimes it's in the interest of the car manufacturer for there cars to be more powerful than they claim? to protect sales of " better , more popular cars , and future models " and to keep insurance premiums down so more people buy the model.

    EVO mag have already got the S3 claimed 5.7 0-60 down to 5.6.

    It makes you wonder?

    p

  18. #97
    Vtec Abuser's Avatar
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Lincoln
    Posts
    306
    Plus Autocar managed a 0-100 of 13.6 too..


  19. #98
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    Ive just had a look on the GIAC and Revo web sites , and the figures there quoting ( not including the Hammer map ) tally up with the runs we saw on the RR day.

    GIAC - 25-45 hp - 40-65 lbft. = 305bhp 300-325lb ft

    http://www.giacusa.com/programs.php?mpid=179

    Revo - 300bhp - 310lb ft

    http://www.revotechnik.com/products/....aspx?pvID=980

    I think everybody was expecting the mapped cars to do better than what the tuners claim, but in fact they were bang on!

    Most people were surprised that the STD cars made so much more than claimed , but TBH i wasn't as i explained earlier in the thread about this engaine making more than claimed, thats why i wanted to get a run under my belt before i started modding.

    I have no doubts that the mapped cars will be faster and more drivable on the road or track , and sooner or later i will be getting a remap.

    Thanks

    p

  20. #99
    Spin140's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Derbyshire, England
    Posts
    2,013
    Quote Originally Posted by phantom View Post
    Ive just had a look on the GIAC and Revo web sites , and the figures there quoting ( not including the Hammer map ) tally up with the runs we saw on the RR day.

    GIAC - 25-45 hp - 40-65 lbft. = 305bhp 300-325lb ft

    http://www.giacusa.com/programs.php?mpid=179

    Revo - 300bhp - 310lb ft

    http://www.revotechnik.com/products/....aspx?pvID=980

    I think everybody was expecting the mapped cars to do better than what the tuners claim, but in fact they were bang on!

    Most people were surprised that the STD cars made so much more than claimed , but TBH i wasn't as i explained earlier in the thread about this engaine making more than claimed, thats why i wanted to get a run under my belt before i started modding.

    I have no doubts that the mapped cars will be faster and more drivable on the road or track , and sooner or later i will be getting a remap.

    Thanks

    p

    Sorry leon but as you're a DJ, I think it was a track by Livin Joy - Dreamer.!!!


    There is no way the difference between mapped and standard is 10/15 bhp and absolutely no way on this earth that a standard car will have nearly 250bhp at the wheels, if it makes you feel good about the S3 fine but absolutely no way. Even if your car as standard makes around 280bhp, which wouldn't surprise me that much as all my previous VAG cars have made good gains from standard (ie my 3 x 2.0tdi 140 averaged 153bhp) but to get 250 at the wheels you are talking around 290/300 bhp. To prove transmission losses on the same RR take a look at their website as it has my GTI Mk5 on there with dyno plots from 2006 it was obviously front wheel drive yet made substantial losses ? In the case of my GTi i believe the power figures to be within 2/3 bhp as proved by 2 separate RR, JBS & Superchips HQ.


    Go figure.
    Wife - 12 BMW 320D 181 bhp, 8 Speed Auto, Melbourne Red, Heated Leather, privacy.
    10 S3 SB, Phantom, Buckets,Int light Pack, Privacy. (Sold)
    Golf GTi MK6 - Revo stage 2, ITG, Milltek Race TBE, AP Racing 4 pot BBK - Sold.
    10 S3 SB, Phantom, Buckets,Int light Pack, Privacy,Nav, Park sensors, 6 disc, Revo Stage 1, ITG Enclosed Intake - Sold
    BMW M135i F20 - Bloody good straight from the box !

    "Fast Cars are Safer...."

  21. #100
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    Only one of my runs was 248 ATW , the other two were 243 and 244 ATW , so 290-300 bhp is not gonna be right, the bloke did say one of your runs will be higher than the other two.

    I'll settle for 280bhp tho!

    LOL

    Thanks

    leon

  22. #101
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    GIAC Hammer remap for S3

    I'm not slagging off the Hammer , GIAC , or Revo in this thread mate, i'm as gutted as you that the remapped cars never made as much as we all hoped for!

    Ive gone out of my way 2/3 times to say that your car feels faster than mine , and would be better to drive day to day on the road or the track!

    The STD cars made more than most of us expected.

    Would it be fair to say the tuners are guoting 40bhp off there remaps, but you MAY only receive 20bhp or so off there maps , because the STD car MAY be putting out 20bhp over book figure?

    I will still get a remap , probabley GIAC at some point.

    Oh and if were comparing songs , here one for you by Public Enemy, Don't believe the hype!!! LOL

    love

    leon AKA Phantom
    Last edited by phantom; 10th March 2008 at 18:34.

  23. #102
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    383
    As said before, total output is not the full story,the figures seem to suggest 15-20 bhp difference in mapped and std cars,but that is peak output untill the graphs can be overlayed to see the difference, the advantages of mapped against std is not perhaps going to be so obvious from dyno readings.

    On the day same rollers all the mapped /non mapped S3 seem to be fairly consistant so any issues should apply to both, therefore drivetrain loss should be irrelevant to output readings, so the difference (apart from bhp) has got to be the difference in the power delivery.

  24. #103
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    ^^^^^^^^Exactly , and ive said throughout this thread that a remapped car ( IE , one from the RR day ) would be faster all over the rev range than a STD car, be much more fun , and i'am gonna get a remap!

    p

  25. #104
    3.2 Ju's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    1,200
    As an Illustration of what a remap gives you besides peak figures, this is a printout from when I had my old LCR remapped at awesome I had 3 runs done and then remapped while still on the rollers and then 3 runs with the remap.

    As you can see the peak bhp was only slightly up, but the curve is different. The plot shown was on a 95ron remap, I later had the 98ron put on as well and that gave 234whp with 267lb/ft

    S3 Sportback S-Tronic

    Previous
    2010 R36 Saloon in Biscay Blue
    2008 Red S3
    2005 A3 3.2 quattro S-line Sportback dsg Avus silver
    2005 A3 3.2 quattro Sport Sportback dsg Black


  26. #105
    mattandrew's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Up in the hills, Derbyshire
    Posts
    971
    Were there any TDI's at Awesome, if so what results were they coming out with, was gona have a run over but ended up doing a bit of DIY
    Previous
    S
    3
    Ibis White - 2007

    Current
    A5 Ibis White - 2007
    S3 Black - 2001

    VCDS user

  27. #106
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    Agreed , it's not just peak power, the extra 30-40lb ft will make a huge difference to how the car drives , and the speed it can reach peak power.

    A remap will be worth the outlay of money for the drivability factor , but at this stage of my cars life , and the fact so little is known of the maps/long term damage, i maybe wise to hang fire for a while, ive only done 7k miles!

    p

  28. #107
    mitch78's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    noun: a particular place or position
    Posts
    2,723
    Last edited by mitch78; 4th March 2009 at 00:20.
    Ex 8L S3 driver

    also A3, 320, Golf, Clio, Astra, Focus, Mondeo, Laguna, Escort, Calibra, 220, others and now back to a Focus...

  29. #108
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    Agreed , it's what ive been saying all day!

    Iam not disputing any of this , in fact i'm not disputing anything......it's other people who are!

    Whos plot is that Lee?

    p

  30. #109
    mitch78's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    noun: a particular place or position
    Posts
    2,723
    Last edited by mitch78; 4th March 2009 at 00:21.
    Ex 8L S3 driver

    also A3, 320, Golf, Clio, Astra, Focus, Mondeo, Laguna, Escort, Calibra, 220, others and now back to a Focus...

  31. #110
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    So you had three runs with the map on?

    Were you still there when Louay ( the red S3 ) ran? what did he get?

    leon

  32. #111
    mitch78's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    noun: a particular place or position
    Posts
    2,723
    Last edited by mitch78; 4th March 2009 at 00:21.
    Ex 8L S3 driver

    also A3, 320, Golf, Clio, Astra, Focus, Mondeo, Laguna, Escort, Calibra, 220, others and now back to a Focus...

  33. #112
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    310
    looks pretty clear that the standard S3's put out more than the factory stated 265bhp, also looks like the remap companies match what they say they put out ,with the exception of GIAC's 330bhp map, which seems to be just slightly more than everyone else 300-310bhp map.

    The extra power and torque throughout the rev range on that APR map (and I presume the other tuning companies maps would be similar) should make a huge difference to how fast the car is despite the peak figures being only 15bhp more than standard.

    Very useful info, thanks all.

  34. #113
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    383
    Can we say we got there in the end?

  35. #114
    Kris's Avatar
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    220
    Damn, that got a debate going ....... has the dust settled .

    Well, i also have the GIAC map (best stop calling it the 330 eh!). Initally i wouldn't say i was disappointed but a little supprised with peak bhp figures although i did expect graphs to show a boost in mid range. So, i'd pretty much agree with what's been stated in that stock cars put out more bhp than manufacturers suggest and remaps are a little over estimated. That said and i take on board comments about remaps only offering 15/20 bhp peak power and i can see why there's a doubt as to whether they are worth the money for the apparent small gain. I'm kinda glad i had mine remapped before i knew the GIAC figures as i may not have had the map done even allowing for the extra mid range as i too would be sceptical about it all. Not here to blow hot air up GIAC's ass but i have had it remapped and glad i did. So, forgetting dyno figures and seat of the pants driving ...... When the turbo spools up and you keep it on boost up and down the gears (driven in anger ;-)) the car really does pull hard. One of the downsides if it can be called that is that the S3 excellerates with little to no drama and as much as it is fast i personally don't always get a full sense of the speed until i look at the clock and think oh ****! Which leads us on to yesterday when i went out for a good run in the S3 with my friend in his Z4M (338bhp). Straight speed from a 1st gear roll on and red lining in gears to over 130mph (would have guessed at around 100 or so) there was little to nothing to speperate the two cars. With the Z4M leading, coming out of bends he had a slight edge which i'm not sure whether it was the extra power and straight six engine or simply he could get the power down first. I'm not saying the S3 is better, faster etc, simply that in the remapped state it can certainly hold it's own against more exotic and powerfull cars. Fuel didn't last long but we both had a big grin when we got back. In conclusion, if someone wanted a remap for pub bragging rights or to potter around in it then i'd probably suggest keep your money. If you want some extra ooomph, like to have a play with the heavy right foot and don't mind the car drinking fuel then i'd suggest the remapped S3 may just put a smile on your face. As to which or who's remap it seems now that they are all pretty much all on par.
    Last edited by Kris; 10th March 2008 at 23:36.
    RS Focus MP 350
    Porsche 997 Carrera
    S3 Sprint blue
    A3 SLine170TDI

  36. #115
    Vtec Abuser's Avatar
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Lincoln
    Posts
    306
    Awesome post.. Looking forward to playing with some exotics myself come end of April, when I get te ED30 mapped..


  37. #116
    Spin140's Avatar
    6th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Derbyshire, England
    Posts
    2,013
    Superb post Kris and in hindsight the correct approach to a remap, forget the figures and focus on the driving experience.

    To everyone I've disagreed with - Ilove you
    Wife - 12 BMW 320D 181 bhp, 8 Speed Auto, Melbourne Red, Heated Leather, privacy.
    10 S3 SB, Phantom, Buckets,Int light Pack, Privacy. (Sold)
    Golf GTi MK6 - Revo stage 2, ITG, Milltek Race TBE, AP Racing 4 pot BBK - Sold.
    10 S3 SB, Phantom, Buckets,Int light Pack, Privacy,Nav, Park sensors, 6 disc, Revo Stage 1, ITG Enclosed Intake - Sold
    BMW M135i F20 - Bloody good straight from the box !

    "Fast Cars are Safer...."

  38. #117
    S3IZZO
    Guest
    I had a dabble with a Porsche Cayman S on the way back from this and was suprised how he didn't pull away until..well i'm not going to admit the speed on a public forum.

    What did suprise me is the way the S3 handles at high speed on a motorway, it really didn't feel safe or planted at all - the suspension rebound feels very harsh and lumpy when you're getting on a bit. I had read about this in various reviews before buying the car but this was the first time i'd experienced it first hand and I didn't like it at all.

    I'm going to have to seriously think about suspension and brake upgrades before even considering more power!

  39. #118
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    What are you on at the moment Jordan? lowering springs?

    Are you gonna go the whole coilover route?

    p

  40. #119
    S3IZZO
    Guest
    I'm on standard suspension!

    Yes I will more than likely go for fully adjustable coilovers (adjustable rebound/damping), i'm not just going to drop it to the floor I want it setup correctly so i'll probably get Quattronics to do this for me.

    Hard to explain but when going over bumps on a motorway at higher speed the rebound seemed to be too fast and the car seemed to skip and jump over the bumps, at one point it felt like the back end of the car was actually in the air and at high speeds that's a scary moment!

  41. #120
    On Boost

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,756
    So with that in mind, i'd be better off putting the 200 it would cost me for a set of H&R's to a decent set of coilovers?

    p

 

 
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO

Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO