recomdos said:wow, you'd think they'd be a bit more secured up than that wouldn't ya? unless the photographer had to perform a SAS obstacle stylee journey to get there? :S
Eeef said:but externally it was completely uninspiring.
bowfer said:The lack of security when storing/transporting cars amazes me.
We drove down to Scunthorpe not so long ago and saw a transporter full of Ferraris.
Unless the driver was Chuck Norris,that was a hijack waiting to happen.
Seriously,you'd think they'd be a bit more 'cloak and dagger' about high risk/high value cars,but evidently not.
Christ,I cover all the windows when I transport a £7K bike by van !
The facility flashes the cars with the correct programming during its PDI's process. The guy I was talking to there was saying that due to this the risks of cars being stolen was nil. Its possibly the same story with other cars which maybe explains the lack of security./QUOTE]
I suppose that will stop the opportunist thief,but I can't see something like this stopping professionals,can you ?
Maybe I watch too many films,I dunno !
bowfer said:If you only showed me the photo of the rear ends,I'd assume they were just the new TT.
normski said:Completely agree...
staz1000 said:Completely disagree! I think the back end is stunning. Very low and wide.
bowfer said:If you only showed me the photo of the rear ends,I'd assume they were just the new TT.
Boydie said:i would have thought they would be more protected ie from the elements!
i wouldnt be too pleased to know that my R8 had been sitting in a stone filled field before collection
normski said:I am sure in the flesh it will look great, but as usual, to some it will not be flash enough (if it was it would be branded by the same people as "chav")
normski said:I am sure in the flesh it will look great,
Eeef said:Nope, it doesn't. It doesn't even have as much prescence as an RS4.