Sorry for posting without more information. Here are the facts:
March 2005 Audi A3 3.2 manual
Taken to AmD in Bicester on May 13th, with C. 11000km on the odometer. (AmD uses a MAHA brake dyno, iirc)
hp before remap:
252
hp after:
274
tq before:
248 lb/ft
tq after:
273 lb/ft
On my way back to France, and just to check the AmD numbers, the newly remaped, otherwise standard car was taken to an inertia dyno (Dyno Race, with DIN 70020 correction factor), at a shop called RPM-Performance in Valence, near Lyon (great place btw).
hp:
275
tq:
34.9 M/Kg
Now, I don't have the Lb/Ft to Meters/Kilograms conversion table with me, but Audi/VW rate the 3.2 at 32 M/Kg. So RPM's reading of 35 M/Kg translates to a 10% increase in torque, which in turn confirms AmD's 10% increase (248 to 273 Lb/Ft).
Can everybody agree to this, even S3? Thank you.
November 11th, with 45000 km on the odo, and having had a Milltek resonated cat-back and BMC CDA installed, the car was taken to RPM-Performance's rollers once again:
hp:
281
Tq:
36.8 M/Kg
Here's the car on the rollers at RPM-Performance:
Now, regarding camshafts and the benefits one can expect from them... I feel very confident that a solid 15hp can be gained from a mild set of cams, with mild overlap. Steeper opening/closing of the valves, giving more total open time. The 3.2L, 24v VR6's camshafts have continuously variable timing. As such, verniers are not be be mentioned with this engine. However, managing the programing of the cams' phasing could lead to maintaining low-end torque while reaping high-end benefits. Eip (among others) are reportedly working on such a solution.
Hope this helps,
Ben.
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beerchug.gif