Monster MotorsportAH Fabrications
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 52 of 52
  1. #41
    Ibis S3 Fan Club

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Somewhere Cold
    Posts
    1,496

    Re: Road Race: 2.0FSI v 2.0TDI

    [ QUOTE ]
    and that they don't feel sporty. The latter reason is why Ferrari/BMW don't use a dual-clutch, and instead have their own SMGs and such. They feel sporties when you can feel the change [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

    [/ QUOTE ]

    That'll be why Porsche are developing their own DSG box then [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] because, hey, well porsche's aren't sporty are they [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

  2. # ADS
    ADS
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Global
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #42
    imported_CurryMilkShake
    Guest

    Re: Road Race: 2.0FSI v 2.0TDI

    Yak - totally agree with the initially perceived 'loss of sensation', as with a constant surge you dont get the repeated surges with each gear change.. though your perception changes with use, definately.

    however, correct me if I'm wrong - there is less transmission 'loss' than you might think - normal autos lose a lot through the torque converter (does this include DSG? not sure) as this wastes energy.

    The Multitronic doesnt have a torque converter, it has conventional clutches, which are electronically controlled, so once engaged doesnt lose any more energy there than a manual. one of the big issues in development apparently was the lack of any 'creep' like you get from a normal auto. The 'creep' that you get from a multitronic is actually software controlled clutch slippage, to 'simulate' the same effect!

    the only other area of loss (compared to a manual) would be the chain, but since this is never allowed to be slack, and is held at the best ratio, theres not going to be significant loss there.

    Torque limits - yes, agreed - I believe the spec for it is 350lb/ft or so, which is pretty respectable, (same as the dsg limit I thnk?)

    I think Audi have got work to do with both variants of the autos, Multi & DSG, but the concepts of keeping the power on during gear changes is good - I think the concept of keeping the engine at max efficiency/power, and then varying the ratio at which that power is applied, while a different way of thinking to what we are used to, is a more pleasing solution from an engineering perspective.

    and I've diverted the thread, whoops - apologies!

  4. #43
    Ibis S3 Fan Club

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Somewhere Cold
    Posts
    1,496

    Re: Road Race: 2.0FSI v 2.0TDI

    [ QUOTE ]
    however, correct me if I'm wrong - there is less transmission 'loss' than you might think - normal autos lose a lot through the torque converter (does this include DSG? not sure) as this wastes energy.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    No, there is no torque converter on DSG. It has 2 conventional clutches so is a manual box with electronically controlled clutches, one for odd and one for even gears.

  5. #44
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    250

    Re: Road Race: 2.0FSI v 2.0TDI

    [ QUOTE ]
    www.audi.co.uk.......
    2.0FSI, 0-100kmh 9.1 secs,top speed 131mph.
    2.0TDI, 0-100kmh 9.5 secs,top speed 129 mph, and thats from "the horses mouth"

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Yeh and VW had the 1.8T 150bhp engine quicker on paper than the PD150 Golf but everyone knows the TDI left the 1.8T Golf for dead...happened to me many a time in my GTI where I was wasted by a PD150.

    One of the reasons why I went for a diesel.

  6. #45
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    250

    Re: Road Race: 2.0FSI v 2.0TDI

    [ QUOTE ]
    I've never managed to get 28mpgs from my car, not even in the middle of winter and when I've been driving just short periods in the city. I wonder how they got that reading?



    [/ QUOTE ]

    You've never seen 28 or less than???

  7. #46
    Ibis S3 Fan Club

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Somewhere Cold
    Posts
    1,496

    Re: Road Race: 2.0FSI v 2.0TDI

    [ QUOTE ]
    [ QUOTE ]
    I've never managed to get 28mpgs from my car, not even in the middle of winter and when I've been driving just short periods in the city. I wonder how they got that reading?



    [/ QUOTE ]

    You've never seen 28 or less than???

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Damn, I wish I had bought the FSI now as it's far more econommical than the TDI [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

    Oh and Audi as well as every other manufacturer does not do their mpg figures in a bench. They have to, by law do a very strict test route following set procedures.

  8. #47
    OutLore's Avatar
    VOIP Dude

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    1,183

    Re: Road Race: 2.0FSI v 2.0TDI

    [ QUOTE ]
    Damn, I wish I had bought the FSI now as it's far more econommical than the TDI [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

    [/ QUOTE ]

    LOL! me too! Mine regularly drops to 11 or so if I am gunning it! have seen 5mpg too [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] but only for a second, and normally between on and off throttle....

    Maybe we should have a "Who can get the lowest average" thread instead of the usual "how many can you get to a tankful" ..... I think the 3.2 guys might be up for it anyway [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

  9. #48
    JaminBen's Avatar
    3rd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    France (ronRonrRRron)
    Posts
    532

    Re: Road Race: 2.0FSI v 2.0TDI

    ah, no?

  10. #49
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    298

    Re: Road Race: 2.0FSI v 2.0TDI

    60-0 litres in 100 miles, he-he.

    My MPG calculations often go to zero, or even --- when the computer gives up!

  11. #50
    yak
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    377

    Re: Road Race: 2.0FSI v 2.0TDI

    [ QUOTE ]

    You've never seen 28 or less than???

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Averaging a 28 mpg per tank, no I haven't. That would be 10,8l/100km and that's pretty high.

  12. #51
    Reverse Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    12

    Re: Road Race: 2.0FSI v 2.0TDI

    'Do you really think manufacturers set their gear ratios to deliver the best 0-60 time'

    they do - a few examples

    0-60 is led alot by no of gear changes (non dsg owners take note!) and rev limit
    2 changes = fast 0-60 - 3 not so good - obviously engine has to be powerfull enough to pull a gear!

    citroen saxo vts - massively long second gear to get the 0-60 time down - hence a big hole in 3rd to make up for it! (very annoying except from the lights!)

    porsche boxter - regeared the car to make its 0-60 worse - reason - so that 911 owners could laugh at them and wouldnt be tempted to buy a significantly cheaper car which is in the real world as quick! (still a hairdressers car ;-)

    my 911 has a short ratio box option - so not as quick as a few 0-60 wise as i have another gear change to fit in - but on a twisty..... mmmmmmm nice

  13. #52
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    298

    Re: Road Race: 2.0FSI v 2.0TDI

    [ QUOTE ]
    [ QUOTE ]
    60-0 litres in 100 miles, he-he.

    My MPG calculations often go to zero, or even --- when the computer gives up!

    [/ QUOTE ]

    --- means you are not using any fuel at all doesn't it? IE off throttle and decelerating - moving foward keeps the engine running, so no fuel is required...

    [/ QUOTE ]

    I know what you mean, but this time... unfortunately, no. the rapid reduction in the MPG figure shown, followed by --- seems to happen (in this case) when I press the fun button too hard [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO

Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO