AH FabricationsSky Insurance
Results 1 to 27 of 27
  1. #1
    leeds2592's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    996

    MPG - Anything Wrong?

    Hi all,

    Couple of months ago I bought a 56 plate 2.0 FSI (I know its not the T version but coming from a 1.2 Clio its definitely a step up). Now, I probably do around 90 miles a week, with 60 miles of those being trips to and from work 3 days a week. The rest being short trips around town of only a few miles etc.

    My problem is, only the trips to work, if driven very sensibly I can average around 32mpg according to the trip computer. On other days with short trips its usually around 25-27mpg. There's not that much power either which is leading me to think I've made the wrong choice and to sell up so I can get a TDI and a remap.

    Are these just a bit **** on fuel or is there something not quite right?

    Thanks in advance

  2. # ADS
    ADS
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Global
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2
    S.
    S.'s Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    1,386
    i think they are S**** on fuel.
    they like to drink a lot and not having a 6th gear doesn't help with economy.
    s3 Ibis White ... Build Thread

    / Black Grill / FbMfSw / Sunroof / Hill Hold / Armrest / Black Leather-Alcantara interior / Rear Parking Sensors / Heated Seats / Folding Mirrors / Cruise / Rns-e mk2 // ttrs-Brembo Brakes / 12mm spacers / Forge Short + Side Shift / 42dd's / ITG CAI / GfB DV+ / Forge Catch Can / Milltek TBE / Forge Twin IC/ Autotech HpFp / H&R ARB's / WALK / KW v3's / RS4 fpr / Loba&Sachs clutch / Revo Stage 2+ / ...


  4. #3
    mjr901's Avatar
    S3 Pollution Plus+ Edition

    Status
    Online
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    In The Sticks....
    Posts
    2,612
    Its a heavy car, the petrols are not great on fuel.

    The TDI's are actually very good i found, pretty quick and 45 average mpg, I'd for sure get the 170TDI over the FSI.

    I'd go TDI if you want the balance of Power/Economy.

    Stay away from the BKD engines though, go 170tdi .
    2012 Ibis Black Edition S-tronic S3, 3 Door, Shark Stage 2, MTC Intake Kit, Powerflex Fast Road Dogbone Mount, Full Non Res Milltek Exhaust, Forge Development Intercooler + DV system,
    340bhp Mikes Ibis BE 2012 S3...

  5. #4
    OVRA3's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Norwich
    Posts
    1,068
    I've got a tfsi Quattro and I get 21 ish in town and 30 at a push on a run they are **** on fuel.. My average is 25.3 just checked
    A3 Sportback 2.0 TFSI S-Line Quattro Stage 1 Tune it up - Lowestoft Custom Remap- 6187 RPM developing 260 bhp 279lbs ft Akoya Silver, Roof rails, Black heated Vienna Leather, Bose upgrade, Bluetooth

  6. #5
    leeds2592's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    996
    Mine does have 6th and I use it quite a lot which adds to the confusion a bit.

    Kinda regret getting it a bit, although it was a decent price which lead me to buy it in the first place.

  7. #6
    cjsuk's Avatar
    3rd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    554
    as a comparison I get 36mpg 80mph for an hour in my 2001 1.8t A3, driving round town 22-26 mpg and been an arse on the road 12 - 18 mpg. I would have thought on a newer Audi like yours the engine would be more efficient especially with the extra gear.

  8. #7
    cjsuk's Avatar
    3rd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    554
    Do you reset the mpg computer on every trip?

  9. #8
    leeds2592's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    996
    I've found that it sort of resets itself on every trip. I finish a trip with a mph figure and when I set off again a few hours later, it drops to around 10mpg and then works its way up.

    I'm just a bit reluctant to do any mods if there's anything wrong. However, on a long motorway journey I would assume that it would get a decent mpg figure but I'm yet to do a long trip.

  10. #9
    cjsuk's Avatar
    3rd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    554
    Silly thing is, some mods can help, even cleaning some bits n bats can help such as throttle body intake temp sensors etc etc. It all depends how its been used before you got it. I wouldn't think its anything major but I think you should get more mpg out of it.

  11. #10
    leeds2592's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    996
    I can tell its had a hard life and been thrashed around a bit so I got a full service last week just to make sure it wasn't a shed. Other than the oil not being changed in quite a while and the filters being filthy, it wasn't too bad.

  12. #11
    cjsuk's Avatar
    3rd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    554
    I was getting crap figures until I cleaned the IAT sensor it was original 11 yr old part! The 2 wires in the sensor were black, after cleaning to a nice copper colour my mpg was better and the car run better too and that's from just a really simple sensor. Never a wrong move though, having a service

  13. #12
    loudchris53's Avatar
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Camberley, Surrey
    Posts
    399
    The thing I have found with the 2.0t engine which is very similar to yours is that it takes a long time to walm up and it doesn't work very efficiently until this happens. On short journeys the cold engine uses a lot of fuel but on a 50 mile plus motorway run tr engine warms up and I can see 39mpg out of mine if I am careful and around 36 driving normally but I am looking at 23 ish in town. Never driven a non turbo 2.0 but 150hp surely can't feel that slow can it?

    Chris
    A3 2.0 TFSI Sportback - DSG, Alcantara/Leather Heated Seats, Xenons, Acoustic park, Armrest, Folding/auto dimming mirrors, Symphony with Bose, Rain sensor, Multifuntion steering wheel, Lumbar Support, Aluminium roof rails, Lumbar Support, Vanity mirror lights
    MODS - ​RS3 Aluminium Race Inlay trim, LED rear lights, RNS-E, Bluetooth+SDS, Sline front bumper+Black grille

  14. #13
    Artimus's Avatar
    Short Back

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Hertfordshire
    Posts
    1,621
    They're not very good fuel figures.

    I have the 2.0T (DSG) and return better figures than that ...I'm getting an avg 28 around town and would have thought the non-turbo would have been better.

    Perhaps you need to modify your driving for town and stay in a higher gear. If your route is mostly 30mph roads, you shouldn't be using 6th gear at all, as you'll just be labouring the engine at low revs and not using the optimal torque spread! Forget 6th gear until you hit 50mph and aim to keep the revs between 2500-2900rpm.

    hope this helps.
    ................................................
    2009 A3 SB 2.0T DSG S line
    ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

  15. #14
    3rd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    561
    I've got a 2.0T DSG and average 36-38 MPG doing my 25 mile each way commute. Very rare to see below 30MPG even around town.

    Don't listen to the tractor drivers, the 2.0TFSI is pretty good on fuel for it's 200 horses. Your figures do look low, make sure the fuel filters been changed and take it for a good run.

  16. #15
    audicruiser's Avatar
    Audi Heaven

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    1,850
    Quote Originally Posted by Minstadave View Post
    I've got a 2.0T DSG and average 36-38 MPG doing my 25 mile each way commute. Very rare to see below 30MPG even around town.

    Don't listen to the tractor drivers, the 2.0TFSI is pretty good on fuel for it's 200 horses. Your figures do look low, make sure the fuel filters been changed and take it for a good run.
    I agree and get the same figures plus mines mapped. If your only getting 21 mpg around town and not over 30 mpg on a run then I would say there's a problem.

    Turbo engines are normally better on fuel than their non turbo cousins as the turbo actually makes them more efficient!
    Scott

    Audi A3 Sportback 2.0T Quattro S-Line 2007 8P2
    Lava Grey, Exclusive Line Black/Silver Leather, Heated Seats, Bose, RNS-e, iPod, Auto Lights & Wipers, Interior Light Pack

  17. #16
    Ads
    Ads's Avatar
    License to drive

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    8,146
    Quote Originally Posted by leeds2592 View Post
    Hi all,

    Couple of months ago I bought a 56 plate 2.0 FSI (I know its not the T version but coming from a 1.2 Clio its definitely a step up). Now, I probably do around 90 miles a week, with 60 miles of those being trips to and from work 3 days a week. The rest being short trips around town of only a few miles etc.

    My problem is, only the trips to work, if driven very sensibly I can average around 32mpg according to the trip computer. On other days with short trips its usually around 25-27mpg. There's not that much power either which is leading me to think I've made the wrong choice and to sell up so I can get a TDI and a remap.

    Are these just a bit **** on fuel or is there something not quite right?

    Thanks in advance
    The mpg's you have quoted equate to about 350-390miles per tank which is about right for a 2.0FSI for "normal" non motorway driving. Its pretty much exactly the same as mine used to do when I had one.
    Pure motorway driving and it'll rise to somewhere around 450miles to the tank.

    As for the lack of power, they do feel underpowered, but that's mainly because of the smooth power delivery. First gear is awful, second gear is the best, and the rest are just ok.
    Acceleration at low revs is poo, but if you hold on to a gear longer, keeping the revs high, then it becomes a lot more responsive.

  18. #17
    leeds2592's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    996
    I'll have to take it on along run one day as I haven't really stretched its legs, so to speak, yet. I've also not fully filled the tank up so I may fill it to the brim and see how many miles I get out of it.

    With regards to the power. I came from a 1.2 Clio so I think I was just expected it to be very quick. I agree Ads, second gear is definitely the better of the gears and when it gets higher in the revs it can shift but that makes my mpg go down. I can't win! haha.

    Does the RON of fuel actually make that much difference? I know you're supposed to run it on 98, but will I see anything dramatic for the extra cost of the fuel?

  19. #18
    Artimus's Avatar
    Short Back

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Hertfordshire
    Posts
    1,621
    you'll notice a considerable difference in acceleration on Super, but you'll also run the risk of becoming addicted to it & burning even more fuel.

    ...pity we can't have our cake & eat it too.
    ................................................
    2009 A3 SB 2.0T DSG S line
    ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

  20. #19
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    392
    Quote Originally Posted by leeds2592 View Post
    Hi all,

    Couple of months ago I bought a 56 plate 2.0 FSI (I know its not the T version but coming from a 1.2 Clio its definitely a step up). Now, I probably do around 90 miles a week, with 60 miles of those being trips to and from work 3 days a week. The rest being short trips around town of only a few miles etc.

    My problem is, only the trips to work, if driven very sensibly I can average around 32mpg according to the trip computer. On other days with short trips its usually around 25-27mpg. There's not that much power either which is leading me to think I've made the wrong choice and to sell up so I can get a TDI and a remap.

    Are these just a bit **** on fuel or is there something not quite right?

    Thanks in advance
    If insurance is a problem, then look at the 1.4 TFSI before you make any decisions. I've got one and I'm achieving 50+ MPG on a 30 mile dual carriage way trip. Comes with stop start too, which is handy for city driving!
    Picked up on the 30th May!

    2013 '13' Plate - Audi TT 1.8 TFSI S Line Roadster | Ibis White | Xenon Headlights with LED DRL | Half Leather/Suede with Silver Stitching | Brushed Aluminium Trim

    Gone but won't be forgotten! 2011 '11' Plate - Audi A3 1.4 TFSI S Line | Ibis White | Privacy Glass | iPod Dock | Xenon Headlights with LED DRL | Half Leather with Silver Stitching | Brushed Aluminium Trim | S3 Pedals

  21. #20
    Ads
    Ads's Avatar
    License to drive

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    8,146
    Quote Originally Posted by leeds2592 View Post
    Does the RON of fuel actually make that much difference? I know you're supposed to run it on 98, but will I see anything dramatic for the extra cost of the fuel?
    Super makes no noticeable difference at all on the non turbo FSI. You'll get more of an improvement if you do a 20min battery disconnect every month or so to reset the ECU. That seems to live up things bit.

  22. #21
    MrLapou's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Lincoln
    Posts
    1,158
    My 2009 2.0T Quattro S-Tronic does about 30 around town and 38 on long runs @ about 70mph.
    Whip it and that drops to about 24... Love the performance though.

  23. #22
    OVRA3's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Norwich
    Posts
    1,068
    Quote Originally Posted by MrLapou View Post
    My 2009 2.0T Quattro S-Tronic does about 30 around town and 38 on long runs @ about 70mph.
    Whip it and that drops to about 24... Love the performance though.
    38 would be a dream if I am very careful in mine I can get 34 and that's very careful!
    A3 Sportback 2.0 TFSI S-Line Quattro Stage 1 Tune it up - Lowestoft Custom Remap- 6187 RPM developing 260 bhp 279lbs ft Akoya Silver, Roof rails, Black heated Vienna Leather, Bose upgrade, Bluetooth

  24. #23
    leeds2592's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    996
    Bit of an update. Started going to a new gym which is around 10 miles away, pretty much one road straight there with not much stopping for traffic lights etc. Driving with a light right foot and doing a steady 50 mph, I managed to get it up to 39.2mpg but it wouldn't go over the 40mpg .

    This has now got me thinking about retrofitting cruise control

  25. #24
    Zak0123's Avatar
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Cambridgeshire
    Posts
    444
    Cruise control can be good to improve MPG to help against involuntary foot movements etc but it can also compromise it. For example when going uphill non-cruise control users would generally slow slightly and accelerate going downhill, cruise control however will obviously just power through uphill thus increasing MPG.
    Brilliant Black 61 Plate A3 1.6 TDI

    Mods: S3 BE 5 Spoke Rotor Wheels with Goodyear EfficientGrip
    , AppRadio 2, 80% tints, Diamond Vision Headlights

  26. #25
    loudchris53's Avatar
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Camberley, Surrey
    Posts
    399
    39.2mpg over 10 miles is pretty good, i would need at least 50 miles to get anywhere near that figure with mine

    Chris
    A3 2.0 TFSI Sportback - DSG, Alcantara/Leather Heated Seats, Xenons, Acoustic park, Armrest, Folding/auto dimming mirrors, Symphony with Bose, Rain sensor, Multifuntion steering wheel, Lumbar Support, Aluminium roof rails, Lumbar Support, Vanity mirror lights
    MODS - ​RS3 Aluminium Race Inlay trim, LED rear lights, RNS-E, Bluetooth+SDS, Sline front bumper+Black grille

  27. #26
    leeds2592's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    996
    Suppose that figure is pretty decent. That was driving like an absolute Grandad though, reading the road very far ahead and bearly touching the brake etc.

    Think I'll probably get rid of this car after I've had it for around a year and get a TDI to remap

  28. #27
    audigex's Avatar
    3rd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    555
    Sounds about right for the 2.0T. The TDI is great - I have the 170 and I get better mpg than my 1.2 Clio, while travelling significantly faster. 33mpg while flooring it onto an A-road then sitting in traffic, and I can't get it much lower than that if I try.

    There are a lot of us who've gone from Clios to A3s, I wonder if there's a link?
    Ibis White A3 Sportback Black Edition.
    2.0 TDI (170) Quattro
    Pics


 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Anything wrong here ?
    By voorhees in forum General Chat
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 3rd March 2012, 23:44
  2. Anything wrong with getting one of these?
    By audi_a3_turbo in forum A3/S3 Forum (8L Chassis)
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 3rd March 2010, 23:27
  3. CAN THERE BE ANYTHING ELSE WRONG!!!!!!
    By AUDI TURBO in forum A4/S4 forum(B5 Chassis)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 15th February 2008, 13:24
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 28th March 2006, 00:30

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO

Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO